Multi-institutional classification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI using deep learning.

IF 2.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-09 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.13.3.034501
Kai Geissler, Hans Meine, Hendrik Laue, Robert Grimm, Heinrich von Busch, Susanne Diekmann, Dieter Szolar, Sabine Ohlmeyer, Edyta Szurowska, Uwe Fischer, Nachiko Uchiyama, Kazuki Oyama, Noemi Schmidt, Markus Wenzel
{"title":"Multi-institutional classification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI using deep learning.","authors":"Kai Geissler, Hans Meine, Hendrik Laue, Robert Grimm, Heinrich von Busch, Susanne Diekmann, Dieter Szolar, Sabine Ohlmeyer, Edyta Szurowska, Uwe Fischer, Nachiko Uchiyama, Kazuki Oyama, Noemi Schmidt, Markus Wenzel","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.13.3.034501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) are evaluated as part of the BI-RADS reporting standard for the diagnosis of breast cancer in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BPE is associated with breast cancer risk and affects the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI readings but is subject to very high inter-reader variability.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We developed a fully automatic observer-independent method to measure the amount of FGT and BPE based on breast, FGT, and lesion masks, which classifies each into four classes based on thresholds applied to those scores. This retrospective study involved 2840 patients from seven institutions for whom T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI sequences with and without fat suppression were acquired using 1.5 or 3T scanners. FGT and BPE assessments for model development and evaluation were performed according to the BI-RADS guidelines by radiologists from the respective institutions and by a radiographer if the assessments were missing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the models was compared using four-class accuracy and a paired <i>t</i>-test ( <math><mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> </math> ). Our automatic classification of FGT and BPE in a multi-institutional setting achieved a four-class accuracy of 0.535 for FGT and 0.504 for BPE ( <math><mrow><mi>random</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.25</mn></mrow> </math> ). The calibration of the classification thresholds for each site individually resulted in a significant improvement, reaching an accuracy of 0.669 ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> </math> ) for FGT and 0.565 ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> </math> ) for BPE. The area under curve of receiver operating characterstic (ROC-AUC) to classify FGT and BPE into low versus high is 0.883 for FGT and 0.757 for BPE when computed across all sites. The averaged per-site AUCs are 0.926 for FGT and 0.810 for BPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FGT and BPE classification perform significantly better when classification thresholds are selected per clinical site.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"13 3","pages":"034501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13168875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.13.3.034501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) are evaluated as part of the BI-RADS reporting standard for the diagnosis of breast cancer in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BPE is associated with breast cancer risk and affects the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI readings but is subject to very high inter-reader variability.

Approach: We developed a fully automatic observer-independent method to measure the amount of FGT and BPE based on breast, FGT, and lesion masks, which classifies each into four classes based on thresholds applied to those scores. This retrospective study involved 2840 patients from seven institutions for whom T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI sequences with and without fat suppression were acquired using 1.5 or 3T scanners. FGT and BPE assessments for model development and evaluation were performed according to the BI-RADS guidelines by radiologists from the respective institutions and by a radiographer if the assessments were missing.

Results: The performance of the models was compared using four-class accuracy and a paired t-test ( α = 0.05 ). Our automatic classification of FGT and BPE in a multi-institutional setting achieved a four-class accuracy of 0.535 for FGT and 0.504 for BPE ( random = 0.25 ). The calibration of the classification thresholds for each site individually resulted in a significant improvement, reaching an accuracy of 0.669 ( p < 0.05 ) for FGT and 0.565 ( p < 0.05 ) for BPE. The area under curve of receiver operating characterstic (ROC-AUC) to classify FGT and BPE into low versus high is 0.883 for FGT and 0.757 for BPE when computed across all sites. The averaged per-site AUCs are 0.926 for FGT and 0.810 for BPE.

Conclusion: FGT and BPE classification perform significantly better when classification thresholds are selected per clinical site.

基于深度学习的乳腺MRI纤维腺组织的多机构分类和背景实质增强。
目的:将纤维腺组织(FGT)和背景实质增强(BPE)的数量作为磁共振成像(MRI)诊断乳腺癌BI-RADS报告标准的一部分进行评估。BPE与乳腺癌风险相关,并影响乳腺MRI读数的诊断准确性,但在读取器之间存在非常高的差异。方法:我们开发了一种全自动的观察者独立方法来测量基于乳房,FGT和病变遮罩的FGT和BPE的量,该方法根据应用于这些分数的阈值将每一类分为四类。这项回顾性研究包括来自7个机构的2840例患者,他们使用1.5或3T扫描仪获得了有或没有脂肪抑制的t1加权动态对比增强乳房MRI序列。模型开发和评估的FGT和BPE评估由各自机构的放射科医生根据BI-RADS指南进行,如果评估缺失,则由放射技师进行。结果:采用四类精度和配对t检验比较模型的性能(α = 0.05)。我们在多机构环境中对FGT和BPE的自动分类达到了四类精度,FGT为0.535,BPE为0.504(随机= 0.25)。对每个站点的分类阈值进行校准后,FGT和BPE的准确率分别达到0.669和0.565。在所有站点进行计算时,将FGT和BPE划分为低与高的接受者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)为FGT的0.883和BPE的0.757。FGT和BPE的平均每站点auc分别为0.926和0.810。结论:根据临床部位选择不同的分类阈值,FGT和BPE的分类效果明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书