Cost-effectiveness and optimal control analysis of an SIR-P model for rodent-transmitted infection in agricultural environments.

IF 2.6 4区 工程技术 Q1 Mathematics
Mahmoud Moustafa
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness and optimal control analysis of an <i>SIR-P</i> model for rodent-transmitted infection in agricultural environments.","authors":"Mahmoud Moustafa","doi":"10.3934/mbe.2026045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rodent populations in agricultural environments serve as critical reservoirs for zoonotic diseases, posing significant risks to food security and public health. Transmission in these settings is complex, thereby occurring through both direct rodent-to-rodent contacts and indirect exposures to environmental contamination. In this paper, we formulate and analyze a deterministic model that integrates rodent population dynamics with an environmental pathogen compartment. To identify resource-efficient mitigation policies, we develop an optimal control framework that incorporates three time-dependent interventions: contact prevention, environmental sanitation, and treatment. By applying Pontryagin's Maximum Principle, we derive the Hamiltonian, the adjoint system, and the characterization of the optimal controls, and subsequently solve the optimality system using a forward-backward sweep algorithm. We evaluate the epidemiological impact and economic viability of seven distinct intervention strategies using the Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Numerical simulations demonstrate that while the full combination of controls yields the maximum reduction in infection, the prevention-only strategy emerges as the most economically attractive option under restricted budgets. These findings suggest that prioritizing contact-reduction measures provides the most cost-effective basis for disease management, while integrated sanitation and treatments should be scaled based on resource availability. This study provides a quantitative framework that may assist agricultural stakeholders in developing resource-efficient control policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49870,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering","volume":"23 5","pages":"1251-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2026045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rodent populations in agricultural environments serve as critical reservoirs for zoonotic diseases, posing significant risks to food security and public health. Transmission in these settings is complex, thereby occurring through both direct rodent-to-rodent contacts and indirect exposures to environmental contamination. In this paper, we formulate and analyze a deterministic model that integrates rodent population dynamics with an environmental pathogen compartment. To identify resource-efficient mitigation policies, we develop an optimal control framework that incorporates three time-dependent interventions: contact prevention, environmental sanitation, and treatment. By applying Pontryagin's Maximum Principle, we derive the Hamiltonian, the adjoint system, and the characterization of the optimal controls, and subsequently solve the optimality system using a forward-backward sweep algorithm. We evaluate the epidemiological impact and economic viability of seven distinct intervention strategies using the Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Numerical simulations demonstrate that while the full combination of controls yields the maximum reduction in infection, the prevention-only strategy emerges as the most economically attractive option under restricted budgets. These findings suggest that prioritizing contact-reduction measures provides the most cost-effective basis for disease management, while integrated sanitation and treatments should be scaled based on resource availability. This study provides a quantitative framework that may assist agricultural stakeholders in developing resource-efficient control policies.

农业环境鼠类传播感染SIR-P模型的成本效益和最优控制分析。
农业环境中的啮齿动物种群是人畜共患疾病的重要宿主,对粮食安全和公共卫生构成重大风险。这些环境中的传播是复杂的,因此可以通过啮齿动物与啮齿动物的直接接触和间接暴露于环境污染中发生。在本文中,我们制定并分析了一个确定性模型,将啮齿动物种群动态与环境病原体区隔相结合。为了确定具有资源效率的缓解政策,我们制定了一个最优控制框架,其中包括三种与时间相关的干预措施:接触预防、环境卫生和治疗。利用庞特里亚金的极大值原理,导出了最优控制的哈密顿量、伴随系统以及最优控制的特征,并利用正向向后扫描算法求解了最优性系统。我们使用平均成本-效果比(ACER)和增量成本-效果比(ICER)评估了七种不同干预策略的流行病学影响和经济可行性。数值模拟表明,虽然控制措施的全面组合可以最大限度地减少感染,但在预算有限的情况下,仅预防策略是最具经济吸引力的选择。这些发现表明,优先采取减少接触措施为疾病管理提供了最具成本效益的基础,而综合卫生和治疗应根据资源可得性进行调整。本研究提供了一个定量框架,可以帮助农业利益相关者制定资源节约型控制政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 工程技术-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
586
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering (MBE) is an interdisciplinary Open Access journal promoting cutting-edge research, technology transfer and knowledge translation about complex data and information processing. MBE publishes Research articles (long and original research); Communications (short and novel research); Expository papers; Technology Transfer and Knowledge Translation reports (description of new technologies and products); Announcements and Industrial Progress and News (announcements and even advertisement, including major conferences).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书