Mapping sensory sensitivity in autism.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Bat-Sheva Hadad, Inbar Leon, Marissa Hartston, Erez Freud, Ahmad Abu-Akel
{"title":"Mapping sensory sensitivity in autism.","authors":"Bat-Sheva Hadad, Inbar Leon, Marissa Hartston, Erez Freud, Ahmad Abu-Akel","doi":"10.1186/s13229-026-00719-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensory perception in autism is strikingly heterogeneous, with individuals showing both hypo- and hypersensitivity across different sensory domains. While sensory differences are widely recognized as a core feature of autism, the structure and underlying patterns of this variability remain poorly understood. Previous studies have yielded mixed findings, often examining sensory processing in isolation within single domains, thereby limiting a comprehensive understanding of sensory sensitivity in autism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled psychophysical data from 107 autistic and 408 age- and IQ-matched non-autistic individuals across 32 experimental conditions spanning multiple perceptual domains, including size, brightness, orientation, pitch, and face processing. Two complementary statistical approaches were used: segmented regression and a Bayesian hierarchical model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite substantial inter- and intra-individual variability, both models revealed a consistent domain-specific pattern: on average, autistic individuals showed reduced sensitivity to faces and speech, while performance on basic non-social tasks was comparable to or exceeded that of the comparison group. Bayesian modelling further indicated that social relevance, rather than domain alone, accounted for the primary source of divergence between groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study focused on sensory sensitivity thresholds and did not assess perceptual biases or changes in subjective appearance of the stimuli. A full account of perception in autism requires considering these broader alterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current findings suggest that sensory differences in autism reflect a structured perceptual profile shaped by social relevance, stimulus complexity, and individual variability. The results highlight the importance of individualized sensory profiling and may inform both theoretical models and personalized approaches to intervention in autism.</p>","PeriodicalId":18733,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Autism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13410601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Autism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-026-00719-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sensory perception in autism is strikingly heterogeneous, with individuals showing both hypo- and hypersensitivity across different sensory domains. While sensory differences are widely recognized as a core feature of autism, the structure and underlying patterns of this variability remain poorly understood. Previous studies have yielded mixed findings, often examining sensory processing in isolation within single domains, thereby limiting a comprehensive understanding of sensory sensitivity in autism.

Methods: We compiled psychophysical data from 107 autistic and 408 age- and IQ-matched non-autistic individuals across 32 experimental conditions spanning multiple perceptual domains, including size, brightness, orientation, pitch, and face processing. Two complementary statistical approaches were used: segmented regression and a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Results: Despite substantial inter- and intra-individual variability, both models revealed a consistent domain-specific pattern: on average, autistic individuals showed reduced sensitivity to faces and speech, while performance on basic non-social tasks was comparable to or exceeded that of the comparison group. Bayesian modelling further indicated that social relevance, rather than domain alone, accounted for the primary source of divergence between groups.

Limitations: This study focused on sensory sensitivity thresholds and did not assess perceptual biases or changes in subjective appearance of the stimuli. A full account of perception in autism requires considering these broader alterations.

Conclusions: The current findings suggest that sensory differences in autism reflect a structured perceptual profile shaped by social relevance, stimulus complexity, and individual variability. The results highlight the importance of individualized sensory profiling and may inform both theoretical models and personalized approaches to intervention in autism.

描绘自闭症的感觉敏感性。
背景:自闭症患者的感觉知觉具有显著的异质性,个体在不同的感觉域表现出低敏感性和超敏感性。虽然感官差异被广泛认为是自闭症的核心特征,但这种差异的结构和潜在模式仍然知之甚少。以前的研究得出了不同的结果,通常是在单个领域内孤立地检查感觉处理,从而限制了对自闭症感觉敏感性的全面理解。方法:我们收集了107名自闭症患者和408名年龄和智商匹配的非自闭症患者在32个实验条件下的心理物理数据,这些实验条件涉及多个感知域,包括大小、亮度、方向、音调和面部加工。采用了两种互补的统计方法:分段回归和贝叶斯层次模型。结果:尽管个体之间和个体内部存在很大的差异,但两个模型都揭示了一个一致的领域特定模式:平均而言,自闭症个体对面孔和语言的敏感性降低,而在基本非社会任务上的表现与对照组相当或超过对照组。贝叶斯模型进一步表明,社会相关性,而不仅仅是领域,是群体之间分歧的主要来源。局限性:本研究侧重于感觉敏感性阈值,并未评估知觉偏差或刺激主观外观的变化。一个完整的关于自闭症的感知的解释需要考虑到这些更广泛的变化。结论:目前的研究结果表明,自闭症的感官差异反映了由社会相关性、刺激复杂性和个体变异性形成的结构化知觉轮廓。这些结果强调了个性化感觉分析的重要性,并可能为自闭症干预的理论模型和个性化方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Autism
Molecular Autism GENETICS & HEREDITY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Autism is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes high-quality basic, translational and clinical research that has relevance to the etiology, pathobiology, or treatment of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Research that includes integration across levels is encouraged. Molecular Autism publishes empirical studies, reviews, and brief communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书