A Case of the Uncommon Cause of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Coronary Fistula and Coronary Stenosis, Which One to Intervene?

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791676
Markz R M P Sinurat, Taofan Taofan, Daniel P L Tobing, Celly A Atmadikoesoemah, Sandi Sinurat
{"title":"A Case of the Uncommon Cause of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Coronary Fistula and Coronary Stenosis, Which One to Intervene?","authors":"Markz R M P Sinurat, Taofan Taofan, Daniel P L Tobing, Celly A Atmadikoesoemah, Sandi Sinurat","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report a case of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) that had two completely distinct mechanisms in one patient. We applied comprehensive diagnostic tools using noninvasive and invasive physiology and imaging tests before, during, and after the intervention procedure to evaluate the outcome. The patient had previously visited many physicians and was diagnosed with noncardiac chest pain. He was referred to our department due to the increased frequency and intensity of angina pectoris. After a careful diagnosis, we found a nonsignificant stenosis (50%) in the mid-left anterior descending (mid-LAD) artery and an unexpectedly high-flow coronary artery fistula from the LAD to the main pulmonary artery (MPA). We tried a combination therapy with escalation of the anti-ischemic therapy but failed. He was rehospitalized with unstable angina pectoris. After a comprehensive physiology and imaging test, our team decided to perform fistula embolization with detachable coils and defer stenting in the mid-LAD artery. After the intervention procedure, his angina subsided, and his exercise capacity was remarkably improved. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation in 3 months revealed all coils in situ and improved cardiac function. We postulate that comprehensive diagnostic tools are required to select appropriate management and prevent unnecessary procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"35 2","pages":"117-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13171187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report a case of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) that had two completely distinct mechanisms in one patient. We applied comprehensive diagnostic tools using noninvasive and invasive physiology and imaging tests before, during, and after the intervention procedure to evaluate the outcome. The patient had previously visited many physicians and was diagnosed with noncardiac chest pain. He was referred to our department due to the increased frequency and intensity of angina pectoris. After a careful diagnosis, we found a nonsignificant stenosis (50%) in the mid-left anterior descending (mid-LAD) artery and an unexpectedly high-flow coronary artery fistula from the LAD to the main pulmonary artery (MPA). We tried a combination therapy with escalation of the anti-ischemic therapy but failed. He was rehospitalized with unstable angina pectoris. After a comprehensive physiology and imaging test, our team decided to perform fistula embolization with detachable coils and defer stenting in the mid-LAD artery. After the intervention procedure, his angina subsided, and his exercise capacity was remarkably improved. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation in 3 months revealed all coils in situ and improved cardiac function. We postulate that comprehensive diagnostic tools are required to select appropriate management and prevent unnecessary procedures.

慢性冠状动脉综合征的不常见病因:冠状动脉瘘和冠状动脉狭窄,该干预哪一种?
我们报告一例慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS),有两个完全不同的机制在一个病人。我们在介入手术之前、期间和之后应用了综合诊断工具,包括非侵入性和侵入性生理和影像学检查,以评估结果。该患者此前曾多次就诊,并被诊断为非心源性胸痛。由于心绞痛的频率和强度增加,他被转介到我科。经过仔细的诊断,我们发现左中前降支(mid-LAD)有一个不明显的狭窄(50%),并且从LAD到肺动脉主动脉(MPA)有一个意外的高流量冠状动脉瘘。我们尝试了联合抗缺血治疗,但失败了。他因不稳定型心绞痛再次住院。经过全面的生理和影像学检查,我们的团队决定使用可拆卸线圈进行瘘管栓塞,并推迟在lad中部动脉内放置支架。介入治疗后心绞痛消退,运动能力明显改善。3个月的心脏计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)和心脏磁共振(CMR)评估显示所有线圈原位,心功能改善。我们假设需要综合诊断工具来选择适当的管理和防止不必要的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书