Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nathan Graden, David Clark, Jacob D Mikula, Adam J Tagliero
{"title":"Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.","authors":"Nathan Graden, David Clark, Jacob D Mikula, Adam J Tagliero","doi":"10.1007/s12178-026-10032-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Meniscal preservation is a cornerstone of modern knee surgery given the meniscus's essential role in load transmission, joint stability, and cartilage protection. As indications for meniscal repair have expanded, understanding the factors associated with repair failure has become increasingly important. The purpose of this review is to synthesize contemporary evidence regarding risk factors for failure of meniscal repair, clarify how failure is defined and evaluated, and outline current strategies for management of failed repairs to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature supports meniscal repair as a joint-preserving procedure with superior long-term outcomes compared with meniscectomy, though failure and reoperation remain clinically relevant concerns. Failure risk is influenced by a combination of patient-related factors, including smoking status, limb alignment, and medical comorbidities; tear characteristics such as vascular zone, tear pattern, chronicity, and meniscal laterality; and surgical variables including isolated repair versus concomitant ligament reconstruction, repair technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Advances in repair devices, imaging, and biologic augmentation have improved healing potential, and growing evidence supports revision meniscal repair in select patients with favorable tissue quality and tear morphology. Meniscal repair failure is multifactorial and cannot be attributed to surgical technique alone. Successful outcomes depend on appropriate patient selection, careful assessment of tear biomechanics, selection of an optimal repair strategy, and individualized rehabilitation. Revision meniscal repair remains a viable option for preserving meniscal function in appropriately selected patients. Future research should prioritize standardized definitions of failure, comparative studies of repair techniques, and biologic strategies to further improve healing and long-term joint preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13176444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10032-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Meniscal preservation is a cornerstone of modern knee surgery given the meniscus's essential role in load transmission, joint stability, and cartilage protection. As indications for meniscal repair have expanded, understanding the factors associated with repair failure has become increasingly important. The purpose of this review is to synthesize contemporary evidence regarding risk factors for failure of meniscal repair, clarify how failure is defined and evaluated, and outline current strategies for management of failed repairs to guide clinical decision-making.

Recent findings: Recent literature supports meniscal repair as a joint-preserving procedure with superior long-term outcomes compared with meniscectomy, though failure and reoperation remain clinically relevant concerns. Failure risk is influenced by a combination of patient-related factors, including smoking status, limb alignment, and medical comorbidities; tear characteristics such as vascular zone, tear pattern, chronicity, and meniscal laterality; and surgical variables including isolated repair versus concomitant ligament reconstruction, repair technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Advances in repair devices, imaging, and biologic augmentation have improved healing potential, and growing evidence supports revision meniscal repair in select patients with favorable tissue quality and tear morphology. Meniscal repair failure is multifactorial and cannot be attributed to surgical technique alone. Successful outcomes depend on appropriate patient selection, careful assessment of tear biomechanics, selection of an optimal repair strategy, and individualized rehabilitation. Revision meniscal repair remains a viable option for preserving meniscal function in appropriately selected patients. Future research should prioritize standardized definitions of failure, comparative studies of repair techniques, and biologic strategies to further improve healing and long-term joint preservation.

半月板修复失败的危险因素。
综述目的:鉴于半月板在负荷传递、关节稳定性和软骨保护方面的重要作用,半月板保护是现代膝关节手术的基石。随着半月板修复适应症的扩大,了解与修复失败相关的因素变得越来越重要。本综述的目的是综合有关半月板修复失败的危险因素的当代证据,阐明如何定义和评估失败,并概述当前管理失败修复的策略,以指导临床决策。最近的研究结果:最近的文献支持半月板修复作为一种保持关节的手术,与半月板切除术相比,其长期疗效更好,尽管失败和再手术仍然是临床相关的问题。失败风险受患者相关因素的影响,包括吸烟状况、肢体排列和医疗合并症;撕裂特征,如血管区,撕裂模式,慢性和半月板侧偏;手术变量包括孤立修复与伴随韧带重建、修复技术和术后康复。修复设备、成像和生物增强技术的进步提高了愈合潜力,越来越多的证据支持对具有良好组织质量和撕裂形态的患者进行半月板翻修修复。半月板修复失败是多因素的,不能单独归因于手术技术。成功的结果取决于适当的患者选择,仔细评估撕裂生物力学,选择最佳修复策略和个性化康复。改良半月板修复仍然是一个可行的选择保留半月板功能在适当选择的患者。未来的研究应优先考虑失效的标准化定义,修复技术的比较研究,以及进一步改善愈合和长期关节保护的生物学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书