Navigating acceptance: challenges and barriers to Nipah virus vaccine uptake in Malaysia's muslim-majority context.

IF 5.6 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-20 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2026.2674683
Li Ping Wong, Megat Mohamad Amirul Amzar Megat Hashim, Zhiwen Huang, Qinjian Zhao, Hai Yen Lee
{"title":"Navigating acceptance: challenges and barriers to Nipah virus vaccine uptake in Malaysia's muslim-majority context.","authors":"Li Ping Wong, Megat Mohamad Amirul Amzar Megat Hashim, Zhiwen Huang, Qinjian Zhao, Hai Yen Lee","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2026.2674683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development of Nipah virus (NiV) vaccine offers a vital opportunity for pandemic preparedness in Southeast Asia, especially in Malaysia, where the first outbreak occurred. However, vaccine acceptance must be understood within diverse cultural, religious, and social contexts.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review explores key challenges and barriers to NiV vaccine uptake among Malaysia's Muslim-majority population, drawing insights from past rollouts such as COVID-19 and HPV vaccines. Key issues include religious concerns, misinformation, historical hesitancy, lack of trust in health authorities, and gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions, which collectively hinder vaccine acceptance and uptake. The paper also highlights enablers namely religious endorsements, transparent communication, and culturally sensitive engagement with trusted healthcare and community leaders. Evidence-based strategies, like motivational interviewing, narrative communication, and tailored outreach, are discussed. Finally, the 7C model is introduced as a structured framework to address behavioral and psychological barriers to vaccination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Research gaps remain in understanding local psychological drivers, religious governance dynamics, and misinformation patterns. Future efforts should prioritize nationwide KAP studies, validation of behavioral frameworks such as the 7C model, and interventional research on culturally tailored communication. Integrating early <i>halal</i> certification and coordinated religious engagement will be essential for effective and equitable uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"2674683"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2026.2674683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The development of Nipah virus (NiV) vaccine offers a vital opportunity for pandemic preparedness in Southeast Asia, especially in Malaysia, where the first outbreak occurred. However, vaccine acceptance must be understood within diverse cultural, religious, and social contexts.

Areas covered: This review explores key challenges and barriers to NiV vaccine uptake among Malaysia's Muslim-majority population, drawing insights from past rollouts such as COVID-19 and HPV vaccines. Key issues include religious concerns, misinformation, historical hesitancy, lack of trust in health authorities, and gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions, which collectively hinder vaccine acceptance and uptake. The paper also highlights enablers namely religious endorsements, transparent communication, and culturally sensitive engagement with trusted healthcare and community leaders. Evidence-based strategies, like motivational interviewing, narrative communication, and tailored outreach, are discussed. Finally, the 7C model is introduced as a structured framework to address behavioral and psychological barriers to vaccination.

Expert opinion: Research gaps remain in understanding local psychological drivers, religious governance dynamics, and misinformation patterns. Future efforts should prioritize nationwide KAP studies, validation of behavioral frameworks such as the 7C model, and interventional research on culturally tailored communication. Integrating early halal certification and coordinated religious engagement will be essential for effective and equitable uptake.

引导接受:在马来西亚穆斯林占多数的背景下,尼帕病毒疫苗接种的挑战和障碍。
尼帕病毒(NiV)疫苗的开发为东南亚,特别是首次发生疫情的马来西亚的大流行防范提供了重要机会。然而,接受疫苗必须在不同的文化、宗教和社会背景下理解。涵盖领域:本综述探讨了马来西亚穆斯林占多数的人口接种NiV疫苗的主要挑战和障碍,并从过去推出的COVID-19和HPV疫苗中获得了见解。关键问题包括宗教问题、错误信息、历史上的犹豫、对卫生当局缺乏信任以及知识、态度和观念方面的差距,这些问题共同阻碍了疫苗的接受和吸收。该报告还强调了促成因素,即宗教支持、透明沟通以及与值得信赖的医疗保健和社区领导人进行具有文化敏感性的接触。讨论了基于证据的策略,如动机性访谈、叙述性沟通和量身定制的外展。最后,介绍了7C模型作为解决疫苗接种行为和心理障碍的结构化框架。专家意见:在理解当地心理驱动因素、宗教治理动态和错误信息模式方面,研究差距仍然存在。未来的工作应该优先考虑全国性的KAP研究、7C模型等行为框架的验证,以及针对文化定制化沟通的干预研究。整合早期清真认证和协调的宗教参与对于有效和公平的吸收至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书