Analysis of Key Elements in Informed Consent Forms for Biobanks.

Q4 Medicine
Ming-Tao Huang, Xiao-Mei Zhai
{"title":"Analysis of Key Elements in Informed Consent Forms for Biobanks.","authors":"Ming-Tao Huang, Xiao-Mei Zhai","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rapid development of biomedical research in China,biobanks have been widely established as crucial infrastructure supporting precision medicine and big data research.However,at the practical level,informed consent-central to safeguarding the rights and interests of research participants-often shows a disconnection between ethical principles and technological realities.This study first examines the Chinese translation of the term \"biobank\", arguing that \"biological sample data bank\" better reflects both the data-centric nature and governance complexity of such entities.It then systematically reviews the ethical debates surrounding various models of informed consent,including blanket consent,broad consent,dynamic consent,and meta-consent.Building on this analysis,this paper identifies key ethical elements that an effective informed consent form should include.Special attention is paid to the legitimacy and practical challenges of components such as research purpose,data collection,data use,storage duration,risk disclosure,and return of results.This study aims to provide an ethical foundation and practical guidance for improving the informed consent framework in China's biobank governance,thereby promoting a shift from mere regulatory compliance to robust ethical engagement and fostering a virtuous cycle between public trust and sustainable research development.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":"48 2","pages":"302-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of biomedical research in China,biobanks have been widely established as crucial infrastructure supporting precision medicine and big data research.However,at the practical level,informed consent-central to safeguarding the rights and interests of research participants-often shows a disconnection between ethical principles and technological realities.This study first examines the Chinese translation of the term "biobank", arguing that "biological sample data bank" better reflects both the data-centric nature and governance complexity of such entities.It then systematically reviews the ethical debates surrounding various models of informed consent,including blanket consent,broad consent,dynamic consent,and meta-consent.Building on this analysis,this paper identifies key ethical elements that an effective informed consent form should include.Special attention is paid to the legitimacy and practical challenges of components such as research purpose,data collection,data use,storage duration,risk disclosure,and return of results.This study aims to provide an ethical foundation and practical guidance for improving the informed consent framework in China's biobank governance,thereby promoting a shift from mere regulatory compliance to robust ethical engagement and fostering a virtuous cycle between public trust and sustainable research development.

生物库知情同意书关键要素分析。
随着中国生物医学研究的快速发展,生物库作为支持精准医疗和大数据研究的重要基础设施被广泛建立。然而,在实践层面上,知情同意——保护研究参与者的权利和利益的核心——往往显示出伦理原则与技术现实之间的脱节。本研究首先考察了“生物样本数据库”一词的中文翻译,认为“生物样本数据库”更好地反映了这类实体的数据中心性质和治理复杂性。然后系统地回顾了围绕各种知情同意模式的伦理争论,包括全面同意、广泛同意、动态同意和元同意。在此分析的基础上,本文确定了有效的知情同意书应包括的关键伦理要素。特别关注研究目的、数据收集、数据使用、存储时间、风险披露和结果返回等组成部分的合法性和实际挑战。本研究旨在为改善中国生物库治理中的知情同意框架提供伦理基础和实践指导,从而促进从单纯的监管合规向强有力的伦理参与的转变,并促进公众信任与可持续研究发展之间的良性循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书