Quantitative Evaluation of Research Integrity Policies in Medical Field Based on Policy Modeling Consistency Index Model.

Q4 Medicine
Yu-Xiao-Qian Cheng, Kai-Yuan Min, Ze-Kun Liu, Long-Ping Yang, Qing Li
{"title":"Quantitative Evaluation of Research Integrity Policies in Medical Field Based on Policy Modeling Consistency Index Model.","authors":"Yu-Xiao-Qian Cheng, Kai-Yuan Min, Ze-Kun Liu, Long-Ping Yang, Qing Li","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To quantitatively evaluate China's core research integrity policies by constructing an evaluation index system specific to the medical field and reveal the applicability and structural shortcomings of these policies,thereby providing empirical evidence and optimization pathways for enhancing the scientific rigor and practical effectiveness of research integrity governance in China. Methods Eighteen research integrity policy documents issued at the national level by the central government and ministries from January 2010 to January 2025 were collected.An evaluation framework based on the policy modeling consistency index model was constructed via text mining and keyword analysis to quantitatively assess the consistency and effectiveness of these policies.According to their scores,the policies were rated as excellent,good,medium,or bad grade. Results The 18 policies showed the average policy modeling consistency index of 6.27 and the sag index of 2.73,which indicated good overall performance but with clear disparities.Among them,3 policies were rated as excellent,6 as good,and 9 as medium.Analysis of the dimensional averages revealed that while the policies performed robustly in terms of policy function and policy timeliness,they exhibited significant shortcomings in the dimensions of policy target and policy scope,with average scores of 0.59 and 0.44,respectively. Conclusions While China's medical research integrity policy framework is generally effective,it exhibits clear structural shortcomings,including a lack of international perspective,monolithic policy targets,insufficient enforcement rigidity,and low operability.Accordingly,it is recommended that measures such as aligning with global standards,establishing a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance network,strengthening policy enforcement,and improving policy operability should be adopted.These measures will help to systematically optimize China's medical research integrity policy system,thereby enhancing the overall governance level in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":"48 2","pages":"258-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To quantitatively evaluate China's core research integrity policies by constructing an evaluation index system specific to the medical field and reveal the applicability and structural shortcomings of these policies,thereby providing empirical evidence and optimization pathways for enhancing the scientific rigor and practical effectiveness of research integrity governance in China. Methods Eighteen research integrity policy documents issued at the national level by the central government and ministries from January 2010 to January 2025 were collected.An evaluation framework based on the policy modeling consistency index model was constructed via text mining and keyword analysis to quantitatively assess the consistency and effectiveness of these policies.According to their scores,the policies were rated as excellent,good,medium,or bad grade. Results The 18 policies showed the average policy modeling consistency index of 6.27 and the sag index of 2.73,which indicated good overall performance but with clear disparities.Among them,3 policies were rated as excellent,6 as good,and 9 as medium.Analysis of the dimensional averages revealed that while the policies performed robustly in terms of policy function and policy timeliness,they exhibited significant shortcomings in the dimensions of policy target and policy scope,with average scores of 0.59 and 0.44,respectively. Conclusions While China's medical research integrity policy framework is generally effective,it exhibits clear structural shortcomings,including a lack of international perspective,monolithic policy targets,insufficient enforcement rigidity,and low operability.Accordingly,it is recommended that measures such as aligning with global standards,establishing a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance network,strengthening policy enforcement,and improving policy operability should be adopted.These measures will help to systematically optimize China's medical research integrity policy system,thereby enhancing the overall governance level in this domain.

基于政策建模一致性指标模型的医学领域科研诚信政策定量评价
目的通过构建针对医学领域的评价指标体系,对中国核心科研诚信政策进行定量评价,揭示这些政策的适用性和结构性缺陷,为提高中国科研诚信治理的科学严谨性和实践有效性提供实证依据和优化路径。方法收集2010年1月至2025年1月中央政府及部委发布的18份国家级科研诚信政策文件。通过文本挖掘和关键词分析,构建了基于策略建模一致性指标模型的评价框架,定量评价策略的一致性和有效性。根据得分,这些政策被分为优秀、良好、中等、差四个等级。结果18个政策的平均政策建模一致性指数为6.27,凹陷指数为2.73,总体表现良好,但存在明显的差异。其中,优秀政策3项,良好政策6项,中等政策9项。对维度平均值的分析表明,虽然政策在政策功能和政策及时性方面表现良好,但在政策目标和政策范围维度上表现出明显的缺陷,平均得分分别为0.59和0.44。结论中国的医学科研诚信政策框架总体上是有效的,但存在明显的结构性缺陷,包括缺乏国际视野、政策目标单一、执行刚性不足、可操作性低。因此,建议采取与全球接轨、建立多方协同治理网络、加强政策执行、提高政策可操作性等措施。这些措施将有助于系统优化中国医学科研诚信政策体系,从而提升该领域的整体治理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书