Interpretable Prediction of Mortality Risk in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cerebral Infarction Based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳ Database.

Q4 Medicine
Si-Qi Gao, Yun-Shu Jia, Shuo Zhang, Ai-Bin Cheng, Feng-Mei Xing, Jun-Jie Liu
{"title":"Interpretable Prediction of Mortality Risk in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cerebral Infarction Based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳ Database.","authors":"Si-Qi Gao, Yun-Shu Jia, Shuo Zhang, Ai-Bin Cheng, Feng-Mei Xing, Jun-Jie Liu","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To develop an interpretable machine learning model for predicting mortality risk in elderly intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cerebral infarction,and to identify critical prognostic factors. Methods We extracted data of 514 elderly patients with T2DM and cerebral infarction from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳ database.The dataset was partitioned into training and test sets (7∶3 ratio) via scikit-learn.Within the training set,collinearity analysis was conducted,and features with variance inflation factor >5 were excluded.Lasso regression was further adopted to refine the feature selection.Six machine learning models-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost),Logistic regression,LightGBM,AdaBoost,decision tree,and gradient boosting decision tree-were constructed and subjected to rigorous five-fold cross-validation.The optimal model was interpreted by SHAP analysis on the test set to determine the hierarchy of mortality-associated predictors and their nonlinear interactions. Results The XGBoost model demonstrated the best training performance and prediction generalization ability.The area under the curve for 30-day and 365-day mortality risk were 0.928 (95%<i>CI</i>=0.853-0.995) and 0.882 (95%<i>CI</i>=0.800-0.963),respectively.SHAP analysis revealed that the Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score,length of hospital stay,congestive heart failure,length of ICU stay,peripheral capillary oxygen saturation,and heart rate were the top six predictive factors for 30-day mortality risk,while blood urea nitrogen,Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score,peripheral capillary oxygen saturation,age,heart rate,and respiratory rate were the top six predictive factors for 365-day mortality risk. Conclusion The XGBoost model shows significant potential in predicting mortality risk in elderly ICU patients with T2DM and cerebral infarction,underscoring the importance of key clinical predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":"48 2","pages":"284-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To develop an interpretable machine learning model for predicting mortality risk in elderly intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cerebral infarction,and to identify critical prognostic factors. Methods We extracted data of 514 elderly patients with T2DM and cerebral infarction from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳ database.The dataset was partitioned into training and test sets (7∶3 ratio) via scikit-learn.Within the training set,collinearity analysis was conducted,and features with variance inflation factor >5 were excluded.Lasso regression was further adopted to refine the feature selection.Six machine learning models-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost),Logistic regression,LightGBM,AdaBoost,decision tree,and gradient boosting decision tree-were constructed and subjected to rigorous five-fold cross-validation.The optimal model was interpreted by SHAP analysis on the test set to determine the hierarchy of mortality-associated predictors and their nonlinear interactions. Results The XGBoost model demonstrated the best training performance and prediction generalization ability.The area under the curve for 30-day and 365-day mortality risk were 0.928 (95%CI=0.853-0.995) and 0.882 (95%CI=0.800-0.963),respectively.SHAP analysis revealed that the Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score,length of hospital stay,congestive heart failure,length of ICU stay,peripheral capillary oxygen saturation,and heart rate were the top six predictive factors for 30-day mortality risk,while blood urea nitrogen,Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score,peripheral capillary oxygen saturation,age,heart rate,and respiratory rate were the top six predictive factors for 365-day mortality risk. Conclusion The XGBoost model shows significant potential in predicting mortality risk in elderly ICU patients with T2DM and cerebral infarction,underscoring the importance of key clinical predictors.

基于重症监护医疗信息市场-Ⅳ数据库的老年2型糖尿病合并脑梗死患者死亡风险的可解释性预测
目的建立可解释的机器学习模型,预测老年重症监护病房(ICU) 2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并脑梗死患者的死亡风险,并识别关键预后因素。方法从重症监护医疗信息集市-Ⅳ数据库中提取514例老年T2DM合并脑梗死患者资料。通过scikit-learn将数据集划分为训练集和测试集(比例为7∶3)。在训练集中进行共线性分析,剔除方差膨胀因子bbb50的特征。进一步采用Lasso回归对特征选择进行细化。构建了极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、Logistic回归、LightGBM、AdaBoost、决策树和梯度增强决策树六个机器学习模型,并进行了严格的五重交叉验证。通过对测试集的SHAP分析来解释最优模型,以确定死亡率相关预测因子的层次结构及其非线性相互作用。结果XGBoost模型具有较好的训练性能和预测泛化能力。30天和365天死亡风险曲线下面积分别为0.928 (95%CI=0.853 ~ 0.995)和0.882 (95%CI=0.800 ~ 0.963)。SHAP分析显示,牛津急性疾病严重程度评分、住院时间、充血性心力衰竭、ICU住院时间、外周毛细血管血氧饱和度和心率是30天死亡风险的前6个预测因素,而血尿素氮、牛津急性疾病严重程度评分、外周毛细血管血氧饱和度、年龄、心率和呼吸频率是365天死亡风险的前6个预测因素。结论XGBoost模型在预测老年2型糖尿病合并脑梗死ICU患者死亡风险方面具有显著潜力,强调了关键临床预测指标的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书