Diagnostic performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis

Radiologia Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.rxeng.2026.101671
G. Bastarrika , A. Álvarez-Acedo , A. Ezponda , A. Ochoa-González , M.R. López de la Torre , F.M. Caballeros Lam , D.A. Zambrano , R.J. Ruiz-Salmerón
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis","authors":"G. Bastarrika ,&nbsp;A. Álvarez-Acedo ,&nbsp;A. Ezponda ,&nbsp;A. Ochoa-González ,&nbsp;M.R. López de la Torre ,&nbsp;F.M. Caballeros Lam ,&nbsp;D.A. Zambrano ,&nbsp;R.J. Ruiz-Salmerón","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2026.101671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50%) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The FFRCT was retrospectively calculated for 73 patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4 on CCTA who underwent conventional coronary angiography, using a deep learning-based software (DEEPVESSEL-FFR, Keya Medical, Kanbai Tech). A FFRCT value &lt;0.80 was considered haemodynamically significant. Conventional coronary angiography was used as the reference standard to compare the effectiveness of the individual use of CCTA, the individual use of FFRCT and the combined use of CCTA and FFRCT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A FFRCT of &lt;0.80 was observed in 62 of the 219 vessels analysed (28.3%). In a per-vessel analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 95.5%, 75%, 62.7%, 97.4%, and 81.3%, respectively for ≥50% stenosis on CCTA, and 67.2%, 88.8%, 72.6%, 85.9% and 82.2%, respectively for FFRCT, when compared to conventional coronary angiography. The combined CCTA + FFRCT interpretation improved the diagnostic performance of the test both on a per-vessel (area under the curve 0.91 vs. 0.85 for CCTA; p = 0.03 and 0.78 for FFRCT; p = 0.007) and per-patient basis (area under the curve 0.89 vs. 0.81 for CCTA; p = 0.005 and 0.79 for FFRCT; p = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combined CCTA + FFRCT interpretation with deep learning-based software improves the diagnostic performance of individual CCTA or FFRCT readings in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"68 3","pages":"Article 101671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510726000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50%) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

Material and methods

The FFRCT was retrospectively calculated for 73 patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4 on CCTA who underwent conventional coronary angiography, using a deep learning-based software (DEEPVESSEL-FFR, Keya Medical, Kanbai Tech). A FFRCT value <0.80 was considered haemodynamically significant. Conventional coronary angiography was used as the reference standard to compare the effectiveness of the individual use of CCTA, the individual use of FFRCT and the combined use of CCTA and FFRCT.

Results

A FFRCT of <0.80 was observed in 62 of the 219 vessels analysed (28.3%). In a per-vessel analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 95.5%, 75%, 62.7%, 97.4%, and 81.3%, respectively for ≥50% stenosis on CCTA, and 67.2%, 88.8%, 72.6%, 85.9% and 82.2%, respectively for FFRCT, when compared to conventional coronary angiography. The combined CCTA + FFRCT interpretation improved the diagnostic performance of the test both on a per-vessel (area under the curve 0.91 vs. 0.85 for CCTA; p = 0.03 and 0.78 for FFRCT; p = 0.007) and per-patient basis (area under the curve 0.89 vs. 0.81 for CCTA; p = 0.005 and 0.79 for FFRCT; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The combined CCTA + FFRCT interpretation with deep learning-based software improves the diagnostic performance of individual CCTA or FFRCT readings in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis.
冠状动脉明显狭窄的ct血流储备诊断价值。
目的:探讨ct衍生分数血流储备(FFRCT)在冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)中对冠状动脉明显狭窄(≥50%)患者的诊断价值。材料和方法:采用基于深度学习的软件(DEEPVESSEL-FFR, Keya Medical, Kanbai Tech),回顾性计算73例CCTA上CAD-RADS为3或4的常规冠状动脉造影患者的FFRCT。结论:基于深度学习的软件联合CCTA + FFRCT解释提高了对显著冠状动脉狭窄患者单个CCTA或FFRCT读数的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书