Maximum Acceptable Box Width and Box Mass for One-Handed Box Transfers from Three Shelf Heights: A Psychophysical Approach.

IF 1.8
Julia Xinyi Li, Dennis Larson, Christopher Moore, Steven Fischer
{"title":"Maximum Acceptable Box Width and Box Mass for One-Handed Box Transfers from Three Shelf Heights: A Psychophysical Approach.","authors":"Julia Xinyi Li, Dennis Larson, Christopher Moore, Steven Fischer","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2026.2665230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effectively using digital human models (DHM) for proactive ergonomics requires estimating how workers interact with objects. One example is guessing when a worker might use one hand rather than two when transferring a box. A better understanding of the determinants for performing one-handed transfers will inform DHM users on when human-object interactions should be modeled with one hand versus two.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work aimed to determine the maximum acceptable box width and mass that would permit a one-handed box transfer from three shelf heights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed a series of box transfers from three shelf heights to a table with their dominant hand. Participants were instructed to grasp the box from the top or front, then adjust the box width (experiment one) or box mass when the box was set at their maximum acceptable grip span (experiment two) until participants reached their maximum acceptable span or mass, respectively, to transfer the box comfortably and safely. Within-subject repeated measure ANOVAs, with an alpha value of 0.05, were used to detect if shelf height or grip orientation affected the maximum acceptable box width and mass, respectively, for a one-handed transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The perceived maximum acceptable box width ranged from 13.3 cm to 13.8 cm. The perceived maximum acceptable box mass ranged from 2.05 to 2.51 kg. The maximum acceptable width and mass for one-handed transfers were lowest when grasping a box from a shoulder-height shelf at the front of the box.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the box width was less than 70% hand length, and required less than 36.7% wrist strength, participants were more likely to use one hand for box transfers. Findings provide insight into the one-handed lifting capacity of standard cardboard boxes with no handles and help inform DHM users on when to model one-handed or two-handed box transfers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"404-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2026.2665230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effectively using digital human models (DHM) for proactive ergonomics requires estimating how workers interact with objects. One example is guessing when a worker might use one hand rather than two when transferring a box. A better understanding of the determinants for performing one-handed transfers will inform DHM users on when human-object interactions should be modeled with one hand versus two.

Purpose: This work aimed to determine the maximum acceptable box width and mass that would permit a one-handed box transfer from three shelf heights.

Methods: Participants completed a series of box transfers from three shelf heights to a table with their dominant hand. Participants were instructed to grasp the box from the top or front, then adjust the box width (experiment one) or box mass when the box was set at their maximum acceptable grip span (experiment two) until participants reached their maximum acceptable span or mass, respectively, to transfer the box comfortably and safely. Within-subject repeated measure ANOVAs, with an alpha value of 0.05, were used to detect if shelf height or grip orientation affected the maximum acceptable box width and mass, respectively, for a one-handed transfer.

Results: The perceived maximum acceptable box width ranged from 13.3 cm to 13.8 cm. The perceived maximum acceptable box mass ranged from 2.05 to 2.51 kg. The maximum acceptable width and mass for one-handed transfers were lowest when grasping a box from a shoulder-height shelf at the front of the box.

Conclusions: When the box width was less than 70% hand length, and required less than 36.7% wrist strength, participants were more likely to use one hand for box transfers. Findings provide insight into the one-handed lifting capacity of standard cardboard boxes with no handles and help inform DHM users on when to model one-handed or two-handed box transfers.

单手箱从三个架子高度转移的最大可接受箱宽和箱质量:一种心理物理学方法。
背景:有效地使用数字人体模型(DHM)进行主动人体工程学需要估计工人与物体的交互方式。一个例子是猜测工人在搬运箱子时什么时候可能用一只手而不是两只手。更好地理解执行单手传输的决定因素将告知DHM用户何时应该用一只手而不是两只手来建模人机交互。目的:这项工作旨在确定最大可接受的盒子宽度和质量,允许单手盒子从三个架子高度转移。方法:参与者用惯用手完成了从三个架子高度到桌子的一系列盒子转移。参与者被要求从顶部或前部抓住盒子,然后在盒子被设置在他们的最大可接受的抓握跨度(实验二)时调整盒子的宽度(实验一)或盒子的质量(实验二),直到参与者分别达到他们的最大可接受的跨度或质量,以舒适和安全地转移盒子。受试者重复测量方差分析采用alpha值为0.05的方差分析,分别检测单手转移时架子高度或握把方向是否影响最大可接受的箱子宽度和质量。结果:可接受的最大盒宽范围为13.3 ~ 13.8 cm。可接受的最大箱质量范围为2.05至2.51公斤。单手搬运的最大可接受宽度和质量是最低的,当从箱子前面与肩高的架子上抓取一个箱子时。结论:当箱子宽度小于手长度的70%,并且需要的手腕力量小于36.7%时,参与者更倾向于用一只手来搬运箱子。调查结果提供了洞察单手提升能力的标准纸箱没有手柄,并帮助告知DHM用户何时建模单手或双手箱子转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书