Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Dongjae Jeon, Mira Yoo, So Hyun Kang, Tae-Han Kim, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park
{"title":"Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Dongjae Jeon, Mira Yoo, So Hyun Kang, Tae-Han Kim, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2026.15.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabolic and bariatric surgery has become an increasingly technique-sensitive field in which even modest intraoperative variations may influence postoperative physiology and long-term outcomes. Although sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are well-established procedures, substantial heterogeneity persists in how key technical steps are performed. This review revisits several high-impact technical determinants that remain clinically relevant in routine practice, focusing on antral preservation and bougie calibration in sleeve gastrectomy, and pouch size and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stoma diameter in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In sleeve gastrectomy, more aggressive antral resection and smaller bougie calibers may confer a modest short-term weight-loss advantage, but these benefits appear to be offset by trade-offs involving reflux, stricture, and postoperative intolerance. In Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, smaller gastric pouches and avoidance of an excessively wide GJ are generally associated with more favorable weight-loss outcomes, although reproducibility of construction may be more important than any single numeric target. Overall, current evidence does not support one universally ideal technical configuration. Rather, it supports a balanced strategy based on standardized, reproducible baseline technique, avoidance of extremes, and selective personalization according to patient phenotype, risk profile, and treatment goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13158207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2026.15.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgery has become an increasingly technique-sensitive field in which even modest intraoperative variations may influence postoperative physiology and long-term outcomes. Although sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are well-established procedures, substantial heterogeneity persists in how key technical steps are performed. This review revisits several high-impact technical determinants that remain clinically relevant in routine practice, focusing on antral preservation and bougie calibration in sleeve gastrectomy, and pouch size and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stoma diameter in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In sleeve gastrectomy, more aggressive antral resection and smaller bougie calibers may confer a modest short-term weight-loss advantage, but these benefits appear to be offset by trade-offs involving reflux, stricture, and postoperative intolerance. In Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, smaller gastric pouches and avoidance of an excessively wide GJ are generally associated with more favorable weight-loss outcomes, although reproducibility of construction may be more important than any single numeric target. Overall, current evidence does not support one universally ideal technical configuration. Rather, it supports a balanced strategy based on standardized, reproducible baseline technique, avoidance of extremes, and selective personalization according to patient phenotype, risk profile, and treatment goals.

手术之外:回顾袖式胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的技术决定因素。
代谢和减肥手术已成为一个技术日益敏感的领域,即使是适度的术中变化也可能影响术后生理和长期预后。尽管袖式胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术是成熟的手术,但在关键技术步骤的执行上仍然存在实质性的差异。这篇综述回顾了在常规实践中仍然具有临床相关性的几个高影响的技术决定因素,重点是套筒胃切除术中的胃窦保存和大沟校准,以及Roux-en-Y胃旁路术中的胃袋大小和胃空肠造口术(GJ)造口直径。在套筒胃切除术中,更积极的胃窦切除术和更小的肿胀口径可能会带来适度的短期减肥优势,但这些好处似乎被反流、狭窄和术后不耐受等权衡所抵消。在Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中,较小的胃袋和避免过宽的胃袢通常与更有利的减肥结果相关,尽管构建的可重复性可能比任何单一的数字目标更重要。总的来说,目前的证据并不支持一种普遍理想的技术配置。相反,它支持一种基于标准化、可重复基线技术、避免极端和根据患者表型、风险概况和治疗目标选择性个性化的平衡策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书