Dongjae Jeon, Mira Yoo, So Hyun Kang, Tae-Han Kim, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park
{"title":"Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Dongjae Jeon, Mira Yoo, So Hyun Kang, Tae-Han Kim, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2026.15.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabolic and bariatric surgery has become an increasingly technique-sensitive field in which even modest intraoperative variations may influence postoperative physiology and long-term outcomes. Although sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are well-established procedures, substantial heterogeneity persists in how key technical steps are performed. This review revisits several high-impact technical determinants that remain clinically relevant in routine practice, focusing on antral preservation and bougie calibration in sleeve gastrectomy, and pouch size and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stoma diameter in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In sleeve gastrectomy, more aggressive antral resection and smaller bougie calibers may confer a modest short-term weight-loss advantage, but these benefits appear to be offset by trade-offs involving reflux, stricture, and postoperative intolerance. In Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, smaller gastric pouches and avoidance of an excessively wide GJ are generally associated with more favorable weight-loss outcomes, although reproducibility of construction may be more important than any single numeric target. Overall, current evidence does not support one universally ideal technical configuration. Rather, it supports a balanced strategy based on standardized, reproducible baseline technique, avoidance of extremes, and selective personalization according to patient phenotype, risk profile, and treatment goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13158207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2026.15.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Metabolic and bariatric surgery has become an increasingly technique-sensitive field in which even modest intraoperative variations may influence postoperative physiology and long-term outcomes. Although sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are well-established procedures, substantial heterogeneity persists in how key technical steps are performed. This review revisits several high-impact technical determinants that remain clinically relevant in routine practice, focusing on antral preservation and bougie calibration in sleeve gastrectomy, and pouch size and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stoma diameter in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In sleeve gastrectomy, more aggressive antral resection and smaller bougie calibers may confer a modest short-term weight-loss advantage, but these benefits appear to be offset by trade-offs involving reflux, stricture, and postoperative intolerance. In Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, smaller gastric pouches and avoidance of an excessively wide GJ are generally associated with more favorable weight-loss outcomes, although reproducibility of construction may be more important than any single numeric target. Overall, current evidence does not support one universally ideal technical configuration. Rather, it supports a balanced strategy based on standardized, reproducible baseline technique, avoidance of extremes, and selective personalization according to patient phenotype, risk profile, and treatment goals.