Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Diagnostic Criteria for Lateral Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon Pub Date : 2026-04-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23922/jarc.2025-100
Kosuke Ozaki, Kazushige Kawai, Kay Uehara, Takuya Miura, Soichiro Ishihara, Yoshiki Kajiwara, Mayumi Ozawa, Riki Ohno, Yosuke Iwasa, Kiichi Sugimoto, Nobuaki Hoshino, Yoichi Ajioka
{"title":"Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Diagnostic Criteria for Lateral Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.","authors":"Kosuke Ozaki, Kazushige Kawai, Kay Uehara, Takuya Miura, Soichiro Ishihara, Yoshiki Kajiwara, Mayumi Ozawa, Riki Ohno, Yosuke Iwasa, Kiichi Sugimoto, Nobuaki Hoshino, Yoichi Ajioka","doi":"10.23922/jarc.2025-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Optimal indications for lateral lymph node dissection in patients with rectal cancer have not yet been established. To address this, we previously proposed magnetic resonance imaging-based size criteria that combine long- and short-axis measurements. However, the initial study derived criteria based on an analysis with knowledge of histopathological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to prospectively validate the clinical utility of these magnetic resonance imaging-based criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective multicenter validation study including 125 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery with lateral lymph node dissection. Two independent reviewers who were blinded to the clinical and pathological data evaluated 250 lateral pelvic regions using pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging. Interobserver agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. The need for lateral lymph node dissection was evaluated using predefined size-based criteria and compared with the histopathological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 250 lateral regions evaluated, 206 were dissected, and 29 were histopathologically positive for lateral lymph node metastases. Two reviewers independently assessed whether lateral lymph node dissection was required or could be omitted in 250 regions based on the criteria, and the interobserver agreement was good (weighted kappa = 0.671). The proposed criteria achieved sensitivities of 86.2% and 82.8% and specificities of 57.1% and 52.0% for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This validation study demonstrated that our magnetic resonance imaging-based size criteria are clinically applicable and effective for the preoperative diagnosis of lateral lymph node metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":56349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","volume":"10 2","pages":"264-269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13160577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2025-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Optimal indications for lateral lymph node dissection in patients with rectal cancer have not yet been established. To address this, we previously proposed magnetic resonance imaging-based size criteria that combine long- and short-axis measurements. However, the initial study derived criteria based on an analysis with knowledge of histopathological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to prospectively validate the clinical utility of these magnetic resonance imaging-based criteria.

Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter validation study including 125 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery with lateral lymph node dissection. Two independent reviewers who were blinded to the clinical and pathological data evaluated 250 lateral pelvic regions using pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging. Interobserver agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. The need for lateral lymph node dissection was evaluated using predefined size-based criteria and compared with the histopathological outcomes.

Results: Among the 250 lateral regions evaluated, 206 were dissected, and 29 were histopathologically positive for lateral lymph node metastases. Two reviewers independently assessed whether lateral lymph node dissection was required or could be omitted in 250 regions based on the criteria, and the interobserver agreement was good (weighted kappa = 0.671). The proposed criteria achieved sensitivities of 86.2% and 82.8% and specificities of 57.1% and 52.0% for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusion: This validation study demonstrated that our magnetic resonance imaging-based size criteria are clinically applicable and effective for the preoperative diagnosis of lateral lymph node metastases.

基于磁共振成像的直肠癌侧淋巴结清扫诊断标准的验证:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
目的:直肠癌患者侧淋巴结清扫的最佳适应症尚未确定。为了解决这个问题,我们之前提出了结合长轴和短轴测量的基于磁共振成像的尺寸标准。然而,最初的研究是基于对组织病理学结果的分析得出的标准。因此,本研究旨在前瞻性地验证这些基于磁共振成像标准的临床应用。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心验证研究,包括125例接受根治性手术并侧淋巴结清扫的直肠癌患者。两名独立审稿人对临床和病理数据不知情,使用预处理磁共振成像评估了250个骨盆外侧区域。使用加权kappa统计评估观察者间的一致性。使用预先定义的基于大小的标准评估侧淋巴结清扫的需要,并与组织病理学结果进行比较。结果:在250个外侧区域中,206个被解剖,29个组织病理学呈外侧淋巴结转移阳性。两名评论者根据标准独立评估了250个地区是否需要或可以省略侧淋巴结清扫,观察者之间的一致性很好(加权kappa = 0.671)。审稿人1和2的敏感性分别为86.2%和82.8%,特异性分别为57.1%和52.0%。结论:本验证性研究表明,基于磁共振成像的淋巴结大小标准对侧淋巴结转移的术前诊断具有临床适用性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书