Impact of red propolis addition on the color stability and surface roughness of glass ionomer cements.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2026-05-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v13.45991
Giovanna Kelly Melo de Lima Sampaio, Pedro Henrique Sette-de-Souza, Basílio Rodrigues Vieira, Gêisa Aiane de Morais Sampaio
{"title":"Impact of red propolis addition on the color stability and surface roughness of glass ionomer cements.","authors":"Giovanna Kelly Melo de Lima Sampaio, Pedro Henrique Sette-de-Souza, Basílio Rodrigues Vieira, Gêisa Aiane de Morais Sampaio","doi":"10.2340/biid.v13.45991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness (SR) and color stability of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements (GICs) modified with the addition of red propolis ethanolic extract (RPEE) as an antimicrobial agent.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Four GICs (Riva, Maxxion, Vidrion, and Ketac) were used with the addition of RPEE at concentrations of 11% and 20%. For the control groups, the GICs were manipulated according to the manufacturers' instructions. SR was assessed using a surface profilometer. For the color variation analysis, the specimens' colors were measured in the CIE L<i>a</i>b* color space using a spectrophotometer. The Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test, was used to evaluate statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of RPEE did not negatively affect the SR of Riva, Maxxion, and Ketac GICs (<i>p</i> = 0.796, <i>p</i> = 0.111, and <i>p</i> = 0.858, respectively). By contrast, a significant reduction in SR was observed in Vidrion GIC with the addition of RPEE (<i>p</i> = 0.009). When comparing the different GIC brands, Riva and Ketac exhibited the lowest SR, with significant differences relative to Vidrion (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and Maxxion (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Both RPEE concentrations (11% and 20%) caused major color changes in all GICs tested, with no statistical differences between the two concentrations (<i>p</i> = 1.000), nor among the different GIC brands (<i>p</i> = 0.071).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incorporation of RPEE into conventional GIC did not increase SR, though in the case of Vidrion cement, it resulted in a significant reduction of this parameter. Conversely, the addition of red propolis at both 11% and 20% concentrations caused significant and clinically unacceptable color changes in all tested cements, regardless of brand or concentration.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"13 ","pages":"45991"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13163625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness (SR) and color stability of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements (GICs) modified with the addition of red propolis ethanolic extract (RPEE) as an antimicrobial agent.

Methodology: Four GICs (Riva, Maxxion, Vidrion, and Ketac) were used with the addition of RPEE at concentrations of 11% and 20%. For the control groups, the GICs were manipulated according to the manufacturers' instructions. SR was assessed using a surface profilometer. For the color variation analysis, the specimens' colors were measured in the CIE Lab* color space using a spectrophotometer. The Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test, was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Results: The addition of RPEE did not negatively affect the SR of Riva, Maxxion, and Ketac GICs (p = 0.796, p = 0.111, and p = 0.858, respectively). By contrast, a significant reduction in SR was observed in Vidrion GIC with the addition of RPEE (p = 0.009). When comparing the different GIC brands, Riva and Ketac exhibited the lowest SR, with significant differences relative to Vidrion (p = 0.008) and Maxxion (p = 0.006). Both RPEE concentrations (11% and 20%) caused major color changes in all GICs tested, with no statistical differences between the two concentrations (p = 1.000), nor among the different GIC brands (p = 0.071).

Conclusion: The incorporation of RPEE into conventional GIC did not increase SR, though in the case of Vidrion cement, it resulted in a significant reduction of this parameter. Conversely, the addition of red propolis at both 11% and 20% concentrations caused significant and clinically unacceptable color changes in all tested cements, regardless of brand or concentration.

添加红色蜂胶对玻璃离子水门合剂颜色稳定性和表面粗糙度的影响。
目的:评价添加红蜂胶乙醇提取物(RPEE)后的常规恢复性玻璃离子水门合剂(gic)的表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性。方法:采用四种GICs (Riva, Maxxion, Vidrion和Ketac),添加浓度为11%和20%的RPEE。对于对照组,GICs按照制造商的说明进行操作。使用表面轮廓仪评估SR。为了进行颜色变化分析,使用分光光度计在CIE Lab*色彩空间中测量样品的颜色。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn检验评价统计学显著性。结果:RPEE的加入对Riva、Maxxion、Ketac三种GICs的SR均无负面影响(p = 0.796、p = 0.111、p = 0.858)。相比之下,添加RPEE后,Vidrion GIC的SR显著降低(p = 0.009)。在不同GIC品牌的比较中,Riva和Ketac的SR最低,相对于Vidrion (p = 0.008)和Maxxion (p = 0.006)有显著差异。RPEE浓度(11%和20%)在所有测试的GIC中都引起了主要的颜色变化,两种浓度之间无统计学差异(p = 1.000),不同GIC品牌之间也无统计学差异(p = 0.071)。结论:RPEE掺入常规GIC不会增加SR,但Vidrion水泥会显著降低SR。相反,无论品牌或浓度如何,添加11%和20%浓度的红色蜂胶都会在所有测试水泥中引起明显的临床不可接受的颜色变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书