Artificial intelligence for left ventricular strain.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-14 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001302
Bjørnar Grenne, Andreas Østvik, Håvard Dalen, Lasse Løvstakken
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for left ventricular strain.","authors":"Bjørnar Grenne, Andreas Østvik, Håvard Dalen, Lasse Løvstakken","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for left ventricular (LV) strain echocardiography, with emphasis on studies published during the preceding 18 months, and to assess current evidence for measurement performance, workflow integration, emerging AI-based approaches, disease-specific applications and barriers to widespread clinical adoption.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The most mature evidence relates to automated global longitudinal strain (GLS) measurement, where recent studies show high feasibility, improved reproducibility and reduced operator dependence compared with conventional analysis. AI-based tools have also moved beyond retrospective post-processing towards real-time acquisition support and workflow integration, with evidence of shorter analysis time and more standardized image acquisition. Emerging approaches suggest a shift from single-task GLS automation towards multitask and phenotyping-oriented models in which strain is integrated with broader echocardiographic interpretation. Disease-specific applications are most studied in acute ischaemic heart disease and cardio-oncology, where AI-based strain has shown promise for risk stratification, surveillance and clinical triage. However, agreement with conventional methods remains imperfect and varies substantially across models, decision thresholds are uncertain, and prospective evidence for improved clinical outcomes is still limited.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>AI for LV strain is evolving from single-task automated measurement towards broader support for reproducibility, workflow integration and clinical interpretation. Current priorities are robust external validation, transparent reporting of feasibility and unsuccessful analyses, and prospective evaluation of clinical utility and workflow impact in routine practice, with clinician oversight as a critical component of safe implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for left ventricular (LV) strain echocardiography, with emphasis on studies published during the preceding 18 months, and to assess current evidence for measurement performance, workflow integration, emerging AI-based approaches, disease-specific applications and barriers to widespread clinical adoption.

Recent findings: The most mature evidence relates to automated global longitudinal strain (GLS) measurement, where recent studies show high feasibility, improved reproducibility and reduced operator dependence compared with conventional analysis. AI-based tools have also moved beyond retrospective post-processing towards real-time acquisition support and workflow integration, with evidence of shorter analysis time and more standardized image acquisition. Emerging approaches suggest a shift from single-task GLS automation towards multitask and phenotyping-oriented models in which strain is integrated with broader echocardiographic interpretation. Disease-specific applications are most studied in acute ischaemic heart disease and cardio-oncology, where AI-based strain has shown promise for risk stratification, surveillance and clinical triage. However, agreement with conventional methods remains imperfect and varies substantially across models, decision thresholds are uncertain, and prospective evidence for improved clinical outcomes is still limited.

Summary: AI for LV strain is evolving from single-task automated measurement towards broader support for reproducibility, workflow integration and clinical interpretation. Current priorities are robust external validation, transparent reporting of feasibility and unsuccessful analyses, and prospective evaluation of clinical utility and workflow impact in routine practice, with clinician oversight as a critical component of safe implementation.

人工智能治疗左心室劳损。
综述目的:回顾人工智能(AI)用于左心室(LV)应变超声心动图的最新进展,重点是过去18个月发表的研究,并评估当前测量性能、工作流集成、新兴的基于AI的方法、疾病特异性应用和广泛临床采用障碍的证据。最新发现:最成熟的证据与自动化全球纵向应变(GLS)测量有关,最近的研究表明,与传统分析相比,该方法具有很高的可行性,提高了再现性,减少了对操作人员的依赖。基于人工智能的工具也超越了回顾性后处理,转向了实时采集支持和工作流集成,分析时间更短,图像采集更标准化。新兴的方法建议从单任务GLS自动化转向多任务和表型导向模型,其中应变与更广泛的超声心动图解释相结合。疾病特异性应用研究最多的是急性缺血性心脏病和心脏肿瘤学,在这些领域,基于人工智能的菌株已显示出对风险分层、监测和临床分诊的希望。然而,与传统方法的一致仍然不完善,不同模型之间的差异很大,决策阈值不确定,改善临床结果的前瞻性证据仍然有限。总结:LV菌株的人工智能正在从单任务自动测量向更广泛的可重复性、工作流程集成和临床解释支持发展。当前的优先事项是可靠的外部验证,透明的可行性报告和不成功的分析,以及临床效用和日常实践中工作流程影响的前瞻性评估,临床医生监督是安全实施的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书