Caring for Caregivers: An Assessment of the Caregiving Resources US Academic Medical Schools Provide to Students.

IF 2.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kaitlyn Butzin, Jamie L Vassel, Brianne E Lewis
{"title":"Caring for Caregivers: An Assessment of the Caregiving Resources US Academic Medical Schools Provide to Students.","authors":"Kaitlyn Butzin, Jamie L Vassel, Brianne E Lewis","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2026.2669165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caregiving is a role students may have to fill while pursuing their medical degree. The scope of institutional support for US medical students who serve as caregivers has not been evaluated. This exploratory study's purpose was to evaluate and describe institutional support for student caregivers, identify gaps, and provide insights to support this student population. We assessed institutional support by searching the publicly available websites of 170 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) accredited medical schools (and their associated university, as applicable) from January 2023 to April 2023 for caregiving support resources. We iteratively assigned a code to each identified resource and sorted codes into categories according to caregiving type: parenting, non-parental, and inclusive (parenting and non-parental caregiving). Out of the 170 medical schools evaluated, 87% (N = 148/170) had at least one resource of any category, 87% (N = 148/170) had at least one resource for parental caregivers, 6% (N = 10/170) had at least one inclusive resource, and 2% (N = 3/170) had at least one resource for non-parental caregivers. Further analysis of the resources revealed that across AAMC schools, there were 19 unique types of support provided. Although most US medical schools offer some support for caregiving students, available resources are predominantly parent-focused and do not adequately address the full range of caregiving roles. Lactation spaces, on-campus childcare, and support groups were most commonly offered, while resources for non-parental caregiving students were limited and inconsistently available. Our findings highlight current gaps in institutional support provided to caregiving medical students. Addressing these gaps is critical for promoting student success and retention and may be achieved through the development, implementation, and evaluation of inclusive caregiving resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2026.2669165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caregiving is a role students may have to fill while pursuing their medical degree. The scope of institutional support for US medical students who serve as caregivers has not been evaluated. This exploratory study's purpose was to evaluate and describe institutional support for student caregivers, identify gaps, and provide insights to support this student population. We assessed institutional support by searching the publicly available websites of 170 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) accredited medical schools (and their associated university, as applicable) from January 2023 to April 2023 for caregiving support resources. We iteratively assigned a code to each identified resource and sorted codes into categories according to caregiving type: parenting, non-parental, and inclusive (parenting and non-parental caregiving). Out of the 170 medical schools evaluated, 87% (N = 148/170) had at least one resource of any category, 87% (N = 148/170) had at least one resource for parental caregivers, 6% (N = 10/170) had at least one inclusive resource, and 2% (N = 3/170) had at least one resource for non-parental caregivers. Further analysis of the resources revealed that across AAMC schools, there were 19 unique types of support provided. Although most US medical schools offer some support for caregiving students, available resources are predominantly parent-focused and do not adequately address the full range of caregiving roles. Lactation spaces, on-campus childcare, and support groups were most commonly offered, while resources for non-parental caregiving students were limited and inconsistently available. Our findings highlight current gaps in institutional support provided to caregiving medical students. Addressing these gaps is critical for promoting student success and retention and may be achieved through the development, implementation, and evaluation of inclusive caregiving resources.

照顾照顾者:美国学术医学院提供给学生的照顾资源的评估。
看护是学生在攻读医学学位时可能要承担的角色。对作为护理人员的美国医学生的机构支持范围尚未进行评估。本探索性研究的目的是评估和描述对学生照顾者的机构支持,确定差距,并为支持这一学生群体提供见解。从2023年1月至2023年4月,我们通过在170所美国医学院协会(AAMC)认可的医学院(及其关联大学,如适用)的公开网站上搜索护理支持资源来评估机构支持。我们迭代地为每个已识别的资源分配一个代码,并根据照顾类型将代码分类:养育、非父母和包容性(养育和非父母照顾)。在被评估的170所医学院中,87% (N = 148/170)至少有一种任何类别的资源,87% (N = 148/170)至少有一种父母照顾者的资源,6% (N = 10/170)至少有一种包容性资源,2% (N = 3/170)至少有一种非父母照顾者的资源。对资源的进一步分析显示,在AAMC学校中,提供了19种不同类型的支持。尽管大多数美国医学院为照顾孩子的学生提供一些支持,但现有的资源主要集中在父母身上,并不能充分解决照顾孩子的全部角色。哺乳空间、校园托儿和支持小组是最常见的,而非父母照顾学生的资源有限,而且不一致。我们的研究结果强调了目前机构对护理医学学生提供支持的差距。解决这些差距对于促进学生的成功和留校至关重要,可以通过开发、实施和评估包容性护理资源来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书