[Value of CD4+/CD8+ Ratio Combined with nCD64 Index in Bronchoalveolar Lavage 
Fluid for Differential Diagnosis of Lung Cancer and Non-lung Cancer Diseases].

Q4 Medicine
Xuexue Wu, Chan Yang, Lili Jiang
{"title":"[Value of CD4+/CD8+ Ratio Combined with nCD64 Index in Bronchoalveolar Lavage \u2029Fluid for Differential Diagnosis of Lung Cancer and Non-lung Cancer Diseases].","authors":"Xuexue Wu, Chan Yang, Lili Jiang","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2026.106.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing lung cancer from pulmonary infection and interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of T lymphocyte subsets and neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), alone and in combination, to address this challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BALF was collected between October 2021 and October 2022 from 70 patients admitted to West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Based on final diagnosis, the patients were divided into the lung cancer group (21 cases, including 14 with pure lung cancer and 7 with lung cancer and infection) and the non‑lung cancer group (49 cases, including 39 with pulmonary infection and 10 with ILD). Flow cytometry was used to detect T lymphocyte subsets and CD64 expression in BALF, and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the performance of both indicators in differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection and from ILD, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of combining the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection was further analyzed. Firth's logistic regression was performed to adjust for age and to assess the independent differential diagnosis value of the two indicators between lung cancer and pulmonary infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the non-lung cancer group, the lung cancer group showed significantly lower CD4+ T cell proportion, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and nCD64 index (all P<0.05). Further analysis revealed that the lung cancer group also had significantly lower values of the above indicators compared with the pulmonary infection group (P<0.05), but no significant differences were observed compared with the ILD group (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the CD4+/CD8+ ratio had an AUC of 0.712 (95%CI: 0.575‑0.849, P=0.008) for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection, with a sensitivity of 56.76% and a specificity of 85.00%; the nCD64 index had an AUC of 0.677 (95%CI: 0.539‑0.814, P=0.026), with a sensitivity of 44.74% and a specificity of 95.24%. When the two indicators were combined, the parallel test increased the sensitivity to 78.38%, while the serial test achieved 100.00% specificity and positive predictive value. After adjusting for age, Firth's logistic regression demonstrated that both the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index retained independent differential diagnosis value for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection (both P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined detection of the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index in BALF improves the diagnostic efficacy for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"29 3","pages":"159-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13167505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2026.106.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing lung cancer from pulmonary infection and interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of T lymphocyte subsets and neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), alone and in combination, to address this challenge.

Methods: BALF was collected between October 2021 and October 2022 from 70 patients admitted to West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Based on final diagnosis, the patients were divided into the lung cancer group (21 cases, including 14 with pure lung cancer and 7 with lung cancer and infection) and the non‑lung cancer group (49 cases, including 39 with pulmonary infection and 10 with ILD). Flow cytometry was used to detect T lymphocyte subsets and CD64 expression in BALF, and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the performance of both indicators in differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection and from ILD, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of combining the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection was further analyzed. Firth's logistic regression was performed to adjust for age and to assess the independent differential diagnosis value of the two indicators between lung cancer and pulmonary infection.

Results: Compared with the non-lung cancer group, the lung cancer group showed significantly lower CD4+ T cell proportion, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and nCD64 index (all P<0.05). Further analysis revealed that the lung cancer group also had significantly lower values of the above indicators compared with the pulmonary infection group (P<0.05), but no significant differences were observed compared with the ILD group (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the CD4+/CD8+ ratio had an AUC of 0.712 (95%CI: 0.575‑0.849, P=0.008) for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection, with a sensitivity of 56.76% and a specificity of 85.00%; the nCD64 index had an AUC of 0.677 (95%CI: 0.539‑0.814, P=0.026), with a sensitivity of 44.74% and a specificity of 95.24%. When the two indicators were combined, the parallel test increased the sensitivity to 78.38%, while the serial test achieved 100.00% specificity and positive predictive value. After adjusting for age, Firth's logistic regression demonstrated that both the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index retained independent differential diagnosis value for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection (both P<0.05).

Conclusions: The combined detection of the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and nCD64 index in BALF improves the diagnostic efficacy for differentiating lung cancer from pulmonary infection.

[支气管肺泡灌洗液
CD4+/CD8+比值联合nCD64指数在肺癌与非肺癌疾病鉴别诊断中的价值]。
背景:区分肺癌与肺部感染和间质性肺疾病(ILD)仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中T淋巴细胞亚群和中性粒细胞CD64 (nCD64)指数的单独和联合诊断价值,以解决这一挑战。方法:收集四川大学华西医院2021年10月至2022年10月收治的70例患者的BALF。根据最终诊断将患者分为肺癌组(21例,其中单纯肺癌14例,肺癌合并感染7例)和非肺癌组(49例,其中肺部感染39例,ILD 10例)。流式细胞术检测BALF中T淋巴细胞亚群及CD64表达,计算CD4+/CD8+比值及nCD64指数。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价两项指标在鉴别肺癌与肺部感染和ILD中的表现,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)和95%置信区间(CI)。进一步分析结合CD4+/CD8+比值和nCD64指数鉴别肺癌与肺部感染的诊断效果。采用Firth logistic回归对年龄进行调整,并评估这两项指标在肺癌和肺部感染之间的独立鉴别诊断价值。结果:与非肺癌组比较,肺癌组CD4+ T细胞比例、CD4+/CD8+比值、nCD64指数均显著低于非肺癌组(均P0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,CD4+/CD8+比值鉴别肺癌与肺部感染的AUC为0.712 (95%CI: 0.575 ~ 0.849, P=0.008),敏感性为56.76%,特异性为85.00%;nCD64指数的AUC为0.677 (95%CI: 0.539 ~ 0.814, P=0.026),敏感性为44.74%,特异性为95.24%。两指标联合使用时,平行试验的敏感性提高到78.38%,而串联试验的特异性达到100.00%,具有阳性预测值。校正年龄后,Firth logistic回归结果显示,CD4+/CD8+比值和nCD64指数对肺癌与肺部感染的鉴别仍具有独立的鉴别诊断价值(均为pp结论:BALF中联合检测CD4+/CD8+比值和nCD64指数可提高肺癌与肺部感染的鉴别诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国肺癌杂志
中国肺癌杂志 Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5131
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书