Utility of the Iwate Difficulty Scoring System for the Stratification of Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Motokazu Sugimoto, Yun Zhao, Naoto Gotohda, Hwee-Leong Tan, Ye-Xin Koh, Davit L. Aghayan, Cheng Yao, Takeashi Ishizawa, Francesca Ratti, Wanguang Zhang, Olivier Scatton, Fabricio Ferreira Coelho, Safi Dokmak, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Adrian K. H. Chiow, Iswanto Sucandy, Arpad Ivanecz, Sung-Hoon Choi, Jae Hoon Lee, Mikel Prieto, Marco Vivarelli, Felice Giuliante, Andrea Ruzzenente, Chee-Chien Yong, Mengqiu Yin, Constantino Fondevila, Mikhail Efanov, Zenichi Morise, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Raffaele Brustia, Raffaele Dalla Valle, Ugo Boggi, David Geller, Andrea Belli, Riccardo Memeo, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Roland S. Croner, Salvatore Gruttadauria, Jason Hawksworth, James O. Park, Fernando Rotellar, Gi-Hong Choi, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Xiaoying Wang, Robert P. Sutcliffe, Johann Pratschke, Chung-Ngai Tang, Charing C. N. Chong, Mathieu D'Hondt, Kazuteru Monden, Santiago Lopez-Ben, T. Peter Kingham, Alessandro Ferrero, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Daniel Cherqui, Xiao Liang, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg, Go Wakabayashi, Roberto I. Troisi, Tan-To Cheung, Atsushi Sugioka, Masaki Ueno, Gaetan-Romain Joliat, Moritz Schmelzle, Etsuro Hatano, Alejandro Mejia, Marco V. Marino, Umberto Cillo, Chengzhan Zhu, Zha Yong, Guillaume Millet, Guido Torzilli, Decai Yu, Tran Cong Duy Long, Yufu Peng, Yonggang Wei, Rong Liu, Ho-Seong Han, Olivier Soubrane, David Fuks, Kuo-Hsin Chen, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Luca Aldrighetti, Bjørn Edwin, Brian K. P. Goh, International Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group Investigators
{"title":"Utility of the Iwate Difficulty Scoring System for the Stratification of Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study","authors":"Motokazu Sugimoto,&nbsp;Yun Zhao,&nbsp;Naoto Gotohda,&nbsp;Hwee-Leong Tan,&nbsp;Ye-Xin Koh,&nbsp;Davit L. Aghayan,&nbsp;Cheng Yao,&nbsp;Takeashi Ishizawa,&nbsp;Francesca Ratti,&nbsp;Wanguang Zhang,&nbsp;Olivier Scatton,&nbsp;Fabricio Ferreira Coelho,&nbsp;Safi Dokmak,&nbsp;Vincenzo Mazzaferro,&nbsp;Adrian K. H. Chiow,&nbsp;Iswanto Sucandy,&nbsp;Arpad Ivanecz,&nbsp;Sung-Hoon Choi,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Mikel Prieto,&nbsp;Marco Vivarelli,&nbsp;Felice Giuliante,&nbsp;Andrea Ruzzenente,&nbsp;Chee-Chien Yong,&nbsp;Mengqiu Yin,&nbsp;Constantino Fondevila,&nbsp;Mikhail Efanov,&nbsp;Zenichi Morise,&nbsp;Fabrizio Di Benedetto,&nbsp;Raffaele Brustia,&nbsp;Raffaele Dalla Valle,&nbsp;Ugo Boggi,&nbsp;David Geller,&nbsp;Andrea Belli,&nbsp;Riccardo Memeo,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Hasegawa,&nbsp;Roland S. Croner,&nbsp;Salvatore Gruttadauria,&nbsp;Jason Hawksworth,&nbsp;James O. Park,&nbsp;Fernando Rotellar,&nbsp;Gi-Hong Choi,&nbsp;Ricardo Robles-Campos,&nbsp;Xiaoying Wang,&nbsp;Robert P. Sutcliffe,&nbsp;Johann Pratschke,&nbsp;Chung-Ngai Tang,&nbsp;Charing C. N. Chong,&nbsp;Mathieu D'Hondt,&nbsp;Kazuteru Monden,&nbsp;Santiago Lopez-Ben,&nbsp;T. Peter Kingham,&nbsp;Alessandro Ferrero,&nbsp;Giuseppe Maria Ettorre,&nbsp;Daniel Cherqui,&nbsp;Xiao Liang,&nbsp;Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg,&nbsp;Go Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Roberto I. Troisi,&nbsp;Tan-To Cheung,&nbsp;Atsushi Sugioka,&nbsp;Masaki Ueno,&nbsp;Gaetan-Romain Joliat,&nbsp;Moritz Schmelzle,&nbsp;Etsuro Hatano,&nbsp;Alejandro Mejia,&nbsp;Marco V. Marino,&nbsp;Umberto Cillo,&nbsp;Chengzhan Zhu,&nbsp;Zha Yong,&nbsp;Guillaume Millet,&nbsp;Guido Torzilli,&nbsp;Decai Yu,&nbsp;Tran Cong Duy Long,&nbsp;Yufu Peng,&nbsp;Yonggang Wei,&nbsp;Rong Liu,&nbsp;Ho-Seong Han,&nbsp;Olivier Soubrane,&nbsp;David Fuks,&nbsp;Kuo-Hsin Chen,&nbsp;Mohammad Abu Hilal,&nbsp;Luca Aldrighetti,&nbsp;Bjørn Edwin,&nbsp;Brian K. P. Goh,&nbsp;International Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group Investigators","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic right hepatectomy (L-RH) is a technically complex procedure, characterized by diverse tumor presentations and anatomical variations. While the Iwate Difficulty Scoring System (I-DSS) is widely utilized to assess technical difficulty in laparoscopic liver resections, its predictive value for surgical outcomes in L-RH remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the I-DSS specifically in the context of L-RH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This international, multicenter study included 1732 patients who underwent L-RH at 78 centers between 2005 and 2023. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed based on I-DSS grades. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were categorized into three I-DSS grades: intermediate (<i>n</i> = 13), advanced (<i>n</i> = 355), and expert (<i>n</i> = 1364). Unadjusted analysis showed that higher I-DSS grades were associated with shorter operation time and increased morbidity. However, after adjustment for baseline factors, no significant differences were observed across I-DSS grades in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes, including operation time, blood loss, transfusion, morbidity, mortality, and surgical margin positivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The I-DSS has limited ability to stratify technical difficulty in L-RH. Future studies should be undertaken to develop a new difficulty classification system tailored specifically to specific procedures such as L-RH.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":"33 9","pages":"670-679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic right hepatectomy (L-RH) is a technically complex procedure, characterized by diverse tumor presentations and anatomical variations. While the Iwate Difficulty Scoring System (I-DSS) is widely utilized to assess technical difficulty in laparoscopic liver resections, its predictive value for surgical outcomes in L-RH remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the I-DSS specifically in the context of L-RH.

Methods

This international, multicenter study included 1732 patients who underwent L-RH at 78 centers between 2005 and 2023. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed based on I-DSS grades. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

Patients were categorized into three I-DSS grades: intermediate (n = 13), advanced (n = 355), and expert (n = 1364). Unadjusted analysis showed that higher I-DSS grades were associated with shorter operation time and increased morbidity. However, after adjustment for baseline factors, no significant differences were observed across I-DSS grades in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes, including operation time, blood loss, transfusion, morbidity, mortality, and surgical margin positivity.

Conclusions

The I-DSS has limited ability to stratify technical difficulty in L-RH. Future studies should be undertaken to develop a new difficulty classification system tailored specifically to specific procedures such as L-RH.

Iwate难度评分系统在腹腔镜右肝切除术分层中的应用:一项国际多中心研究。
背景:腹腔镜右肝切除术(L-RH)是一项技术复杂的手术,其特点是肿瘤表现多样,解剖结构各异。虽然Iwate难度评分系统(I-DSS)被广泛用于评估腹腔镜肝切除术的技术难度,但其对L-RH手术结果的预测价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估I-DSS在L-RH背景下的临床应用。方法:这项国际多中心研究包括1732例2005年至2023年间在78个中心接受L-RH治疗的患者。收集基线临床病理特征和手术结果,并根据I-DSS分级进行分析。进行多变量分析以调整潜在的混杂因素。结果:患者被分为三个I-DSS等级:中级(n = 13)、高级(n = 355)和专家(n = 1364)。未经调整的分析显示,较高的I-DSS分级与较短的手术时间和较高的发病率相关。然而,在调整基线因素后,在手术时间、出血量、输血、发病率、死亡率和手术切缘阳性等手术内和术后结局方面,I-DSS分级间没有观察到显著差异。结论:I-DSS分级L-RH技术难度的能力有限。未来应开展研究,开发一种新的难度分类系统,专门针对L-RH等特定程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书