Loïs C van Eck, Clàudia Pallisé Perelló, Natalie Evans, Mariëtte A van den Hoven, Martin P Grobusch, Sabine M Hermans, Hanna K de Jong
{"title":"Building a case for accelerated clinical development of drugs and vaccines - what are the driving forces?","authors":"Loïs C van Eck, Clàudia Pallisé Perelló, Natalie Evans, Mariëtte A van den Hoven, Martin P Grobusch, Sabine M Hermans, Hanna K de Jong","doi":"10.1186/s12992-026-01213-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic, among others, has shown the world that rapid drug and vaccine development and expedited clinical trials can be effective and safe. The overall benefit of accelerating clinical development would be faster public access to medicines. In this study, we explore key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of drivers for the acceleration of clinical development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with policy advisors and experts from key stakeholder groups involved in clinical development, identified via a power-interest stakeholder analysis. Thematic analysis was used to identify analytic themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five participants were interviewed representing pharmaceutical companies, the European Medicines Agency, national competent authorities in the EU, different research and clinical development organizations, including non-governmental organizations, and the World Health Organization. Drivers facilitating acceleration of clinical development could be grouped into three themes: alignment of stakeholders, innovative research design and processes, and financing. Some barriers of systematic acceleration were raised within these themes: European disharmony in trials practice, regulations and guidance; fragmentation of efforts; bureaucracy and the complexity of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) submission process; and financial neglect for poverty-related diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To sustainably accelerate clinical development, future policies should facilitate collaboration and communication between stakeholders and work to minimize technical and bureaucratic barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-026-01213-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic, among others, has shown the world that rapid drug and vaccine development and expedited clinical trials can be effective and safe. The overall benefit of accelerating clinical development would be faster public access to medicines. In this study, we explore key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of drivers for the acceleration of clinical development.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with policy advisors and experts from key stakeholder groups involved in clinical development, identified via a power-interest stakeholder analysis. Thematic analysis was used to identify analytic themes.
Results: Twenty-five participants were interviewed representing pharmaceutical companies, the European Medicines Agency, national competent authorities in the EU, different research and clinical development organizations, including non-governmental organizations, and the World Health Organization. Drivers facilitating acceleration of clinical development could be grouped into three themes: alignment of stakeholders, innovative research design and processes, and financing. Some barriers of systematic acceleration were raised within these themes: European disharmony in trials practice, regulations and guidance; fragmentation of efforts; bureaucracy and the complexity of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) submission process; and financial neglect for poverty-related diseases.
Conclusion: To sustainably accelerate clinical development, future policies should facilitate collaboration and communication between stakeholders and work to minimize technical and bureaucratic barriers.
期刊介绍:
"Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health.
The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.