Building a case for accelerated clinical development of drugs and vaccines - what are the driving forces?

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Loïs C van Eck, Clàudia Pallisé Perelló, Natalie Evans, Mariëtte A van den Hoven, Martin P Grobusch, Sabine M Hermans, Hanna K de Jong
{"title":"Building a case for accelerated clinical development of drugs and vaccines - what are the driving forces?","authors":"Loïs C van Eck, Clàudia Pallisé Perelló, Natalie Evans, Mariëtte A van den Hoven, Martin P Grobusch, Sabine M Hermans, Hanna K de Jong","doi":"10.1186/s12992-026-01213-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic, among others, has shown the world that rapid drug and vaccine development and expedited clinical trials can be effective and safe. The overall benefit of accelerating clinical development would be faster public access to medicines. In this study, we explore key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of drivers for the acceleration of clinical development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with policy advisors and experts from key stakeholder groups involved in clinical development, identified via a power-interest stakeholder analysis. Thematic analysis was used to identify analytic themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five participants were interviewed representing pharmaceutical companies, the European Medicines Agency, national competent authorities in the EU, different research and clinical development organizations, including non-governmental organizations, and the World Health Organization. Drivers facilitating acceleration of clinical development could be grouped into three themes: alignment of stakeholders, innovative research design and processes, and financing. Some barriers of systematic acceleration were raised within these themes: European disharmony in trials practice, regulations and guidance; fragmentation of efforts; bureaucracy and the complexity of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) submission process; and financial neglect for poverty-related diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To sustainably accelerate clinical development, future policies should facilitate collaboration and communication between stakeholders and work to minimize technical and bureaucratic barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-026-01213-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic, among others, has shown the world that rapid drug and vaccine development and expedited clinical trials can be effective and safe. The overall benefit of accelerating clinical development would be faster public access to medicines. In this study, we explore key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of drivers for the acceleration of clinical development.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with policy advisors and experts from key stakeholder groups involved in clinical development, identified via a power-interest stakeholder analysis. Thematic analysis was used to identify analytic themes.

Results: Twenty-five participants were interviewed representing pharmaceutical companies, the European Medicines Agency, national competent authorities in the EU, different research and clinical development organizations, including non-governmental organizations, and the World Health Organization. Drivers facilitating acceleration of clinical development could be grouped into three themes: alignment of stakeholders, innovative research design and processes, and financing. Some barriers of systematic acceleration were raised within these themes: European disharmony in trials practice, regulations and guidance; fragmentation of efforts; bureaucracy and the complexity of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) submission process; and financial neglect for poverty-related diseases.

Conclusion: To sustainably accelerate clinical development, future policies should facilitate collaboration and communication between stakeholders and work to minimize technical and bureaucratic barriers.

为加速药物和疫苗的临床开发建立一个案例——驱动力是什么?
背景:除其他外,2019冠状病毒病大流行向世界表明,快速开发药物和疫苗以及加快临床试验可以是有效和安全的。加快临床发展的总体好处将是让公众更快地获得药物。在这项研究中,我们探讨了关键利益相关者的经验和对加速临床开发的驱动因素的看法。方法:我们对参与临床开发的主要利益相关者群体的政策顾问和专家进行了半结构化访谈,通过权力利益相关者分析确定。主题分析用于确定分析主题。结果:对代表制药公司、欧洲药品管理局、欧盟国家主管当局、包括非政府组织在内的不同研究和临床开发组织以及世界卫生组织的25名与会者进行了访谈。促进临床开发加速的驱动因素可以分为三个主题:利益相关者的协调、创新的研究设计和流程以及融资。在这些主题下,提出了系统加速的一些障碍:欧洲在审判实践、法规和指导方面的不协调;努力分散;官僚主义和临床试验信息系统(CTIS)提交过程的复杂性;以及对贫困相关疾病的经济忽视。结论:为了持续加速临床开发,未来的政策应促进利益相关者之间的合作和沟通,并努力减少技术和官僚主义障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书