Review, conceptual model, and gap analysis of transfusion burden in hematological diseases.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2026.2667750
Jennifer Lord-Bessen, Esther Natalie Oliva, Mrudula B Glassberg, Hong Xiao, Jessica Jordan, Gale Harding, Ahmed Hnoosh
{"title":"Review, conceptual model, and gap analysis of transfusion burden in hematological diseases.","authors":"Jennifer Lord-Bessen, Esther Natalie Oliva, Mrudula B Glassberg, Hong Xiao, Jessica Jordan, Gale Harding, Ahmed Hnoosh","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2026.2667750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hematological diseases affect millions of people worldwide, and many of these patients require blood transfusions. Although the potential adverse clinical outcomes associated with transfusions are well documented, the patient perspective of transfusion burden in hematological diseases is not. This perspective is critical, as health-related quality of life scores alone cannot fully capture patients' experiences.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A comprehensive review was conducted to understand the patient perspective of transfusion burden in hematological diseases. This study included a targeted literature review of peer-reviewed articles conducted in Embase and MEDLINE from January 2012-September 2024 (stage 1), a preliminary conceptual model (stage 2), a review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included in clinical trials and label claims (stage 3), and a gap analysis of existing PROMs (stage 4).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>This study identified four key concepts and two existing PROMs that were relevant to transfusion burden in hematological diseases. Transfusions impact patients economically, physically, socially, and emotionally. The study identified an unmet need: existing PROMs lack specificity to transfusion burden, lack generalizability to all hematological diseases, and do not reflect all four key concepts identified. A new PROM is needed to better understand the patient perspective of transfusion burden in hematological diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"767-778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2026.2667750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hematological diseases affect millions of people worldwide, and many of these patients require blood transfusions. Although the potential adverse clinical outcomes associated with transfusions are well documented, the patient perspective of transfusion burden in hematological diseases is not. This perspective is critical, as health-related quality of life scores alone cannot fully capture patients' experiences.

Areas covered: A comprehensive review was conducted to understand the patient perspective of transfusion burden in hematological diseases. This study included a targeted literature review of peer-reviewed articles conducted in Embase and MEDLINE from January 2012-September 2024 (stage 1), a preliminary conceptual model (stage 2), a review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included in clinical trials and label claims (stage 3), and a gap analysis of existing PROMs (stage 4).

Expert opinion: This study identified four key concepts and two existing PROMs that were relevant to transfusion burden in hematological diseases. Transfusions impact patients economically, physically, socially, and emotionally. The study identified an unmet need: existing PROMs lack specificity to transfusion burden, lack generalizability to all hematological diseases, and do not reflect all four key concepts identified. A new PROM is needed to better understand the patient perspective of transfusion burden in hematological diseases.

血液病中输血负担的回顾、概念模型和差距分析。
血液病影响着全世界数百万人,其中许多患者需要输血。虽然与输血相关的潜在不良临床结果有很好的文献记载,但血液系统疾病患者对输血负担的看法却没有。这一观点至关重要,因为健康相关的生活质量评分本身并不能完全反映患者的经历。涵盖领域:进行了一项全面的综述,以了解血液病患者对输血负担的看法。本研究包括对2012年1月至2024年9月在Embase和MEDLINE上发表的同行评议文章进行有针对性的文献综述(第一阶段),建立初步概念模型(第二阶段),对临床试验和标签声明中包含的患者报告的结果测量(prom)进行综述(第三阶段),以及对现有prom的差距分析(第四阶段)。专家意见:本研究确定了与血液病输血负担相关的四个关键概念和两个现有的PROMs。输血对患者的经济、身体、社会和情感都有影响。该研究发现了一个未满足的需求:现有的PROMs缺乏对输血负担的特异性,缺乏对所有血液系统疾病的普遍性,并且没有反映所有确定的四个关键概念。为了更好地了解血液病患者对输血负担的看法,需要一种新的PROM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书