Single cell mechanodeformation signatures as early biomarkers for hematological malignancies.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ali Sani, Yang Yu, Muhammad Idrees Khan, Li Yuanrong, Yi Liu, Yaling Liu
{"title":"Single cell mechanodeformation signatures as early biomarkers for hematological malignancies.","authors":"Ali Sani, Yang Yu, Muhammad Idrees Khan, Li Yuanrong, Yi Liu, Yaling Liu","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2026.2665294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-cell mechanical profiling of deformations has become a promising method of identifying a functional biomarker in patients with blood cancers. By quantifying the physical and mechanical properties of individual cells, this method examines the biomechanical changes that occur after alterations in the structure of the cytoskeleton, as well as changes occurring within the nucleus or chromatin as it relates to being transformed by cancerous processes. Mechanodeformation signatures provide a unique, universally applicable, and label-free measure of cellular states; therefore, they provide a different methodological category compared with traditional approaches such as immunophenotyping and molecular assays. This article critically reviews the mechanobiological basis for deformation and describes and compares quantifiable measurement parameters of deformation (stiffness, deformation index, recoverability, and transition dynamics) as well as a comparison between traditional methods of deformability analysis with microfluidic technologies, including their respective analytical performance, throughput, and clinical readiness. Relevant data will be summarized for each of the three leukemias, multiple myelomas and lymphomas examined, with an emphasis on study design, sample size, and validation of mechanism based on established criteria of measurable outcomes. We will also discuss how clinical applications such as early diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment response analysis, and monitoring of people with minimal detectable percentile changes (MRD) can all be done in a clinical setting. A special emphasis will be placed on pre-and post-analytical variables, standardization, quality control, and reproducibility, all critical to successfully implementing laboratory assessments. Additionally, we will examine different levels of variation (e.g., biological heterogeneity, cross-platform comparison, bias due to artificial intelligence, and regulatory requirements). Current research supports biological plausibility and discrimination within studies; however, large-scale multi-site validation and harmonized reporting standards must still happen before establishing routine use. The development of mechanodeformation signatures will create the opportunity for it to be integrated into current functional imaging tests used as a standard metric with regular measurements being taken over time. This ongoing study will serve to expand the current utilization of single-cell biomechanical phenotyping to improve personalized/precision-based medicine within the field of hematology.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"685-711"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2026.2665294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-cell mechanical profiling of deformations has become a promising method of identifying a functional biomarker in patients with blood cancers. By quantifying the physical and mechanical properties of individual cells, this method examines the biomechanical changes that occur after alterations in the structure of the cytoskeleton, as well as changes occurring within the nucleus or chromatin as it relates to being transformed by cancerous processes. Mechanodeformation signatures provide a unique, universally applicable, and label-free measure of cellular states; therefore, they provide a different methodological category compared with traditional approaches such as immunophenotyping and molecular assays. This article critically reviews the mechanobiological basis for deformation and describes and compares quantifiable measurement parameters of deformation (stiffness, deformation index, recoverability, and transition dynamics) as well as a comparison between traditional methods of deformability analysis with microfluidic technologies, including their respective analytical performance, throughput, and clinical readiness. Relevant data will be summarized for each of the three leukemias, multiple myelomas and lymphomas examined, with an emphasis on study design, sample size, and validation of mechanism based on established criteria of measurable outcomes. We will also discuss how clinical applications such as early diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment response analysis, and monitoring of people with minimal detectable percentile changes (MRD) can all be done in a clinical setting. A special emphasis will be placed on pre-and post-analytical variables, standardization, quality control, and reproducibility, all critical to successfully implementing laboratory assessments. Additionally, we will examine different levels of variation (e.g., biological heterogeneity, cross-platform comparison, bias due to artificial intelligence, and regulatory requirements). Current research supports biological plausibility and discrimination within studies; however, large-scale multi-site validation and harmonized reporting standards must still happen before establishing routine use. The development of mechanodeformation signatures will create the opportunity for it to be integrated into current functional imaging tests used as a standard metric with regular measurements being taken over time. This ongoing study will serve to expand the current utilization of single-cell biomechanical phenotyping to improve personalized/precision-based medicine within the field of hematology.

单细胞机械变形特征作为血液系统恶性肿瘤的早期生物标志物。
单细胞变形的力学分析已经成为一种很有前途的方法来识别血癌患者的功能性生物标志物。通过量化单个细胞的物理和机械特性,该方法检查了细胞骨架结构改变后发生的生物力学变化,以及与癌变过程转化相关的细胞核或染色质内发生的变化。力学变形签名提供了一种独特的、普遍适用的、无标签的细胞状态测量方法;因此,与传统的方法如免疫表型和分子分析相比,它们提供了不同的方法类别。本文批判性地回顾了变形的力学生物学基础,描述和比较了变形的可量化测量参数(刚度,变形指数,可恢复性和过渡动力学),以及传统的变形性分析方法与微流控技术之间的比较,包括各自的分析性能,吞吐量和临床准备。将总结三种白血病、多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤的相关数据,重点是研究设计、样本量和基于可测量结果的既定标准的机制验证。我们还将讨论如何在临床环境中完成临床应用,如早期诊断、风险分层、治疗反应分析和最小可检测百分位变化(MRD)患者的监测。特别强调分析前和分析后的变量、标准化、质量控制和可重复性,这些都是成功实施实验室评估的关键。此外,我们将研究不同程度的变异(例如,生物异质性、跨平台比较、人工智能造成的偏差和监管要求)。目前的研究支持研究中的生物合理性和歧视;然而,在建立常规使用之前,仍然必须进行大规模的多站点验证和统一的报告标准。机械变形特征的发展将为其集成到当前的功能成像测试中创造机会,作为标准度量,随着时间的推移进行定期测量。这项正在进行的研究将有助于扩大目前单细胞生物力学表型的应用,以改善血液学领域的个性化/精准医学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书