Are plasma discharges really “catalyst-free”?

IF 9.8
EES catalysis Pub Date : 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1039/D5EY00305A
Thuy Vy Le, C. Buddie Mullins and Thomas C. Underwood
{"title":"Are plasma discharges really “catalyst-free”?","authors":"Thuy Vy Le, C. Buddie Mullins and Thomas C. Underwood","doi":"10.1039/D5EY00305A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Many plasma chemistry studies assume that chemical reactions occur either within the volume of plasmas or on heterogeneous catalysts that are distributed in packed beds. This designation overlooks the catalytic role of electrodes that bound the plasma. Beyond sustaining the discharge through electron emission, electrodes can act as chemically active interfaces, undergoing erosion, film growth, and nanoparticle release that influence the reactivity of the plasma phase and surrounding surfaces or interfaces. Literature comparisons show that reactors with catalytically active electrodes often achieve similar or higher performance than packed-bed systems, while reactors with inert boundaries underperform. Here, we perform experiments using a nanosecond-pulsed spark discharge for ammonia synthesis to elucidate how electrodes contribute catalytic reactions in plasma systems. We find that electrode composition affects both yield and energy efficiency strongly: under identical discharge settings, Ni electrodes produced 0.37% NH<small><sub>3</sub></small>, Cu 0.32%, SS 304 0.23%, and W only 0.11%, and on Cu, adjusting the feed ratio from N<small><sub>2</sub></small> : H<small><sub>2</sub></small> = 1 : 3 to 1 : 7 increased NH<small><sub>3</sub></small> yield sevenfold (0.3% to 2.2%). SEM-EDX and XPS analyses confirm that plasma operation generates Cu/Cu–N nanoparticles that coat surfaces within reactors and induce electrode nitridation, providing dynamic nitrogen storage and release and establishing hidden catalytic cycles. These electrode-driven processes influence yields, selectivity, and mechanistic pathways directly. Recognizing electrodes as catalytic elements is essential for accurate mechanistic interpretation, fair benchmarking, and deliberate design of plasma systems, ensuring that advances in plasma chemistry are based on realistic assessments of surface contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72877,"journal":{"name":"EES catalysis","volume":" 3","pages":" 642-659"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/ey/d5ey00305a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EES catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/ey/d5ey00305a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many plasma chemistry studies assume that chemical reactions occur either within the volume of plasmas or on heterogeneous catalysts that are distributed in packed beds. This designation overlooks the catalytic role of electrodes that bound the plasma. Beyond sustaining the discharge through electron emission, electrodes can act as chemically active interfaces, undergoing erosion, film growth, and nanoparticle release that influence the reactivity of the plasma phase and surrounding surfaces or interfaces. Literature comparisons show that reactors with catalytically active electrodes often achieve similar or higher performance than packed-bed systems, while reactors with inert boundaries underperform. Here, we perform experiments using a nanosecond-pulsed spark discharge for ammonia synthesis to elucidate how electrodes contribute catalytic reactions in plasma systems. We find that electrode composition affects both yield and energy efficiency strongly: under identical discharge settings, Ni electrodes produced 0.37% NH3, Cu 0.32%, SS 304 0.23%, and W only 0.11%, and on Cu, adjusting the feed ratio from N2 : H2 = 1 : 3 to 1 : 7 increased NH3 yield sevenfold (0.3% to 2.2%). SEM-EDX and XPS analyses confirm that plasma operation generates Cu/Cu–N nanoparticles that coat surfaces within reactors and induce electrode nitridation, providing dynamic nitrogen storage and release and establishing hidden catalytic cycles. These electrode-driven processes influence yields, selectivity, and mechanistic pathways directly. Recognizing electrodes as catalytic elements is essential for accurate mechanistic interpretation, fair benchmarking, and deliberate design of plasma systems, ensuring that advances in plasma chemistry are based on realistic assessments of surface contributions.

Abstract Image

等离子体放电真的“无催化剂”吗?
许多等离子体化学研究假设化学反应要么发生在等离子体体积内,要么发生在分布在填充床中的多相催化剂上。这个名称忽略了结合等离子体的电极的催化作用。除了通过电子发射维持放电外,电极还可以作为化学活性界面,经历侵蚀、薄膜生长和纳米颗粒释放,从而影响等离子体相和周围表面或界面的反应性。文献比较表明,具有催化活性电极的反应器通常比填充床系统具有相似或更高的性能,而具有惰性边界的反应器则表现不佳。在这里,我们使用纳秒脉冲火花放电进行氨合成实验,以阐明电极如何在等离子体系统中促进催化反应。我们发现电极组成对NH3产率和能量效率都有很强的影响:在相同的放电设置下,Ni电极的NH3产率为0.37%,Cu为0.32%,SS 304为0.23%,W仅为0.11%,而在Cu电极上,将进料比从N2: H2 = 1:3调整为1:7,NH3产率提高了7倍(0.3%至2.2%)。SEM-EDX和XPS分析证实,等离子体操作产生Cu/Cu - n纳米颗粒,这些纳米颗粒覆盖在反应器表面并诱导电极氮化,提供动态氮储存和释放,并建立隐藏的催化循环。这些电极驱动的过程直接影响产率、选择性和机制途径。认识到电极作为催化元素对于等离子体系统的准确机制解释、公平基准测试和深思熟虑的设计至关重要,确保等离子体化学的进步是基于对表面贡献的现实评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书