VALIDATION OF A METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NURSING TECHNOLOGIES

Q2 Nursing
Cléton Salbego, Elisabeta Albertina Nietsche, Silvana Bastos Cogo, Nara Marilene Oliveira Girardon-Perlini, Tiérle Kosloski Ramos, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani Greco, Graciela Dutra Sehnem
{"title":"VALIDATION OF A METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NURSING TECHNOLOGIES","authors":"Cléton Salbego, Elisabeta Albertina Nietsche, Silvana Bastos Cogo, Nara Marilene Oliveira Girardon-Perlini, Tiérle Kosloski Ramos, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani Greco, Graciela Dutra Sehnem","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-0370en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: to verify validity evidence for the Praxis Model for Technology Development® in nursing. Method: a methodological study, guided by the human praxis framework. The operational model content was built by a documentary study of theses and dissertations available in the Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, and theoretical/epistemological content derived from the philosophical framework of Adolfo Sanchez Vázquez. The content and appearance were validated using the Instrument for Evaluating Methodological Models for Technology Development. Content analysis and the Content Validity Index with binomial test were used to analyze the data, while Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability. Results: the model was structured into four phases (pragmatic, creative/artistic, experimental and revolutionary). Validation was carried out by 26 nurse judges, selected according to the established criteria. The model was assessed as relevant by the judges, obtaining a mean index of 0.950 for the content domain and 0.825 for the appearance domain, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.941. Changes were suggested to the model's figures/diagrams regarding color, the model's sequential numbering and the representation of collective participation. Conclusion: the model was found to be clear and applicable for developing technological products and processes through a creative and participatory process, which will enable resolving problems in professional practice. It allows you to identify, plan, execute, test, report and synthesize solutions for nursing practice.","PeriodicalId":51188,"journal":{"name":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-0370en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify validity evidence for the Praxis Model for Technology Development® in nursing. Method: a methodological study, guided by the human praxis framework. The operational model content was built by a documentary study of theses and dissertations available in the Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, and theoretical/epistemological content derived from the philosophical framework of Adolfo Sanchez Vázquez. The content and appearance were validated using the Instrument for Evaluating Methodological Models for Technology Development. Content analysis and the Content Validity Index with binomial test were used to analyze the data, while Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability. Results: the model was structured into four phases (pragmatic, creative/artistic, experimental and revolutionary). Validation was carried out by 26 nurse judges, selected according to the established criteria. The model was assessed as relevant by the judges, obtaining a mean index of 0.950 for the content domain and 0.825 for the appearance domain, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.941. Changes were suggested to the model's figures/diagrams regarding color, the model's sequential numbering and the representation of collective participation. Conclusion: the model was found to be clear and applicable for developing technological products and processes through a creative and participatory process, which will enable resolving problems in professional practice. It allows you to identify, plan, execute, test, report and synthesize solutions for nursing practice.
护理技术发展的方法学研究模型的验证
摘要目的:验证护理技术发展实践模型的有效性证据。方法:在人类实践框架的指导下进行方法学研究。操作模型的内容是通过文献研究《高等教育人才培养协调论文目录》中的论文和论文,以及源自Adolfo Sanchez Vázquez哲学框架的理论/认识论内容来构建的。使用评估技术开发方法模型的工具对内容和外观进行了验证。采用内容分析和内容效度指数结合二项检验对数据进行分析,信度采用Cronbach’s alpha。结果:该模型分为四个阶段(实用、创意/艺术、实验和革命)。根据既定标准选出26名护士法官进行验证。评委对模型进行相关性评价,内容域的平均指数为0.950,外观域的平均指数为0.825,总体Cronbach’s alpha为0.941。建议对模型的图形/图表的颜色、模型的顺序编号和集体参与的表示进行更改。结论:该模型清晰,适用于通过创造性和参与性过程开发技术产品和工艺,有助于解决专业实践中的问题。它允许您识别,计划,执行,测试,报告和综合护理实践的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Texto Contexto Enfermagem
Texto Contexto Enfermagem Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Texto & Contexto Enfermagem provides space for reflection and deepening of knowledge about issues of practice, teaching and research in health and nursing, at national and international levels. The journal is published quarterly in the rolling pass or Continuous flow mode, accepting manuscripts in Portuguese, English or Spanish, in the categories original article, reflection, experience report and review. Contributions designated to the dissemination of unpublished original research results are prioritized for publication. Special issues are published at the discretion of the Board of Directors and Associate Editors. All manuscripts are published in two versions, one of which is English, aiming to cover the largest number of readers worldwide. The editorial policy of Texto & Contexto Enfermagem is based on rigorous quality criteria for indexing and publishing (including technical and normative aspects, graphic and textual quality and excellence in scientific content); on responsibility for shared management between the Board of Directors, Editorial Board and Internal and External Editors Associates; and on the rigorous and constructive peer review, preserving the anonymity of authors and reviewers (double blinded).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书