Reading Resurgence: Indigenous North American and Ghanaian Relationalities in Literature

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vanessa Evans
{"title":"Reading Resurgence: Indigenous North American and Ghanaian Relationalities in Literature","authors":"Vanessa Evans","doi":"10.4000/13qwl","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Indigenous and postcolonial studies are often treated as distinct fields, this article argues for their interconnection through a focus on relational ways of being. By juxtaposing contemporary Indigenous North American and postcolonial Ghanaian novels, this essay explores the concept of relationality as a form of Indigenous resurgence. With Nanabush’s teaching of relationality as a framework, the study examines how characters in Eden Robinson’s Monkey Beach (2000), Diane Wilson’s The Seed Keeper (2021), and Ayi Kwei Armah’s The Healers (1979) navigate and sustain reciprocal relationships with human and non-human kin. The article’s primary contribution is a cross-cultural comparative method called reading resurgence that highlights shared commitments to decolonial futures. By reading resurgence, this work illuminates some of the ways in which Indigenous and postcolonial literatures reject colonial separations and insist on interconnected, place-based ways of knowing. Illuminating what can only be seen in the context of relationships, these novels tell a wider story about the urgent importance of sharing place-based knowledges inter- and intragenerationally to strengthen reciprocal connections between humans and the land. Ultimately, this study affirms the value of cross-cultural literary analysis in understanding how Indigenous and postcolonial narratives contribute to broader global decolonial movements.","PeriodicalId":54031,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of American Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"http://journals.openedition.org/ejas/pdf/23514","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/13qwl","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Indigenous and postcolonial studies are often treated as distinct fields, this article argues for their interconnection through a focus on relational ways of being. By juxtaposing contemporary Indigenous North American and postcolonial Ghanaian novels, this essay explores the concept of relationality as a form of Indigenous resurgence. With Nanabush’s teaching of relationality as a framework, the study examines how characters in Eden Robinson’s Monkey Beach (2000), Diane Wilson’s The Seed Keeper (2021), and Ayi Kwei Armah’s The Healers (1979) navigate and sustain reciprocal relationships with human and non-human kin. The article’s primary contribution is a cross-cultural comparative method called reading resurgence that highlights shared commitments to decolonial futures. By reading resurgence, this work illuminates some of the ways in which Indigenous and postcolonial literatures reject colonial separations and insist on interconnected, place-based ways of knowing. Illuminating what can only be seen in the context of relationships, these novels tell a wider story about the urgent importance of sharing place-based knowledges inter- and intragenerationally to strengthen reciprocal connections between humans and the land. Ultimately, this study affirms the value of cross-cultural literary analysis in understanding how Indigenous and postcolonial narratives contribute to broader global decolonial movements.
阅读复兴:北美原住民与加纳文学的关系
虽然土著研究和后殖民研究经常被视为不同的领域,但本文通过关注存在的关系方式来论证它们之间的相互联系。通过将当代北美土著小说与后殖民时期的加纳小说并置,本文探讨了作为土著复兴形式的关系概念。以Nanabush的关系理论为框架,研究了Eden Robinson的《猴子海滩》(2000)、Diane Wilson的《种子守护者》(2021)和Ayi Kwei Armah的《治愈者》(1979)中的角色是如何与人类和非人类亲属建立和维持互惠关系的。这篇文章的主要贡献是一种被称为阅读复兴的跨文化比较方法,它强调了对非殖民未来的共同承诺。通过阅读《复兴》,本作品阐明了土著和后殖民文学拒绝殖民分离,坚持相互联系、基于地点的认识方式的一些方式。这些小说揭示了只有在人际关系的背景下才能看到的东西,讲述了一个更广泛的故事,即在人与人之间和代内分享基于地方的知识,以加强人类与土地之间的相互联系的迫切重要性。最后,本研究肯定了跨文化文学分析在理解土著和后殖民叙事如何促进更广泛的全球去殖民运动方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of American Studies
European Journal of American Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书