{"title":"Freud between Oedipus and the Sphinx","authors":"Miriam Leonard","doi":"10.1353/arn.2020.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freud between Oedipus and the Sphinx MIRIAM LEONARD Areproduction of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres’s neo-classical painting Oedipus and the Sphinx famously hung over Freud’s couch in his consulting room at Berggasse 19 [figure 1]. Nobody doubts the significance of the figure of Oedipus to the development of Freud’s thought, arion 28.3 winter 2021 Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, (1780–1867). Oedipus and the Sphinx, 1808. Oil on canvas. Photo Credit : Scala/ Art Resource, NY. 132 freud between oedipus and the sphinx but the presence of the Sphinx in this picture raises a series of questions about Freud’s interests which have not been as extensively explored. Indeed, this is far from being the only depiction of the Sphinx which graced Freud’s study. A large etching of the Sphinx at Giza was displayed amongst his bookshelves and a terracotta figurine was amongst his most prized objects.1 These representations of the Sphinx testify to Freud’s broader fascination with Egyptian culture—a fascination which, as we have seen, manifests itself both in his writings and his collection of antiquities. Judith Butler and George Steiner have wondered: “what would happen if psychoanalysis were to have taken Antigone rather than Oedipus as its point of departure?”2 I want to reformulate their question to ask, what would happen if Freud had taken the Sphinx rather than Oedipus as his point of departure? With this counterfactual, I hope to deepen the exploration already undertaken in the previous two articles about Egypt as an origin myth for psychoanalysis—an origin both for the development of the self and for the history of humanity. One possibility, suggested by Edward Said in his last work, Freud and the Non European, is that Freud’s turn to Egypt opened psychoanalysis to a less Eurocentric perspective. For Said, Freud’s foregrounding of Egypt and his interest in the crossover of “non-European” and “European ” cultures testified to his openness and his frustration with the nationalist and racist theories which were so prevalent at the end of his life.3 Said’s claims are compelling but as he would have been the first to note, Freud’s Egyptomania could equally be captive to orientalizing fantasies.4 In what follows I trace the evidence for Freud’s fascination with Egypt and, reading it hieroglyphically (as he would invite us to do), I speculate about its possible impacts on psychoanalysis as art and / or science. Ingres’s first version of Oedipus and the Sphinx—the painting whose reproduction Freud displayed—was completed in 1808. Ingres originally painted the picture in Rome where Miriam Leonard 133 he was studying at the French Academy. In common with other students at the academy, Ingres was required to produce figure studies and the original version of this painting was focused on Oedipus and the representation of his bodily form. Ingres had asked his model to use the same pose as the classical statue of Hermes with the Sandal which is displayed in the Louvre. As François de Vergnette writes: “The clarity of the contours, the muted use of chiaroscuro and the slight surface relief given to the figure of Oedipus add an archaic flavor to the picture. This archaism had its roots in Ingres’s taste for Greek vases.”5 But it is the impact of a different Mediterranean culture which can be felt in Ingres’s depiction of Oedipus’ counterpart. While Oedipus embodies the Winckelmannian Hellenic ideal, the Sphinx is represented in all her oriental glory. Ingres painted this image just ten years after Napoleon had lead his troops and “savants” into Egypt. Napoleon’s Egyptian Campaign gave rise to a widespread fascination with ancient Egyptian culture and its impact on the arts was immense. In choosing to represent Oedipus in his encounter with the Sphinx, Ingres was able to draw on this new aesthetic of orientalism.6 Even before Napoleon ’s expedition, the Sphinx had become a potent visual representation of the mystery of ancient Egypt and of ancient Egypt as mystery. Ingres reworked this image during the course of his career and gave the Sphinx an ever greater prominence. In Ingres ’s depiction, the Sphinx’s orientalism...","PeriodicalId":39571,"journal":{"name":"ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS","volume":"28 3","pages":"131-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arn.2020.0020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Freud between Oedipus and the Sphinx MIRIAM LEONARD Areproduction of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres’s neo-classical painting Oedipus and the Sphinx famously hung over Freud’s couch in his consulting room at Berggasse 19 [figure 1]. Nobody doubts the significance of the figure of Oedipus to the development of Freud’s thought, arion 28.3 winter 2021 Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, (1780–1867). Oedipus and the Sphinx, 1808. Oil on canvas. Photo Credit : Scala/ Art Resource, NY. 132 freud between oedipus and the sphinx but the presence of the Sphinx in this picture raises a series of questions about Freud’s interests which have not been as extensively explored. Indeed, this is far from being the only depiction of the Sphinx which graced Freud’s study. A large etching of the Sphinx at Giza was displayed amongst his bookshelves and a terracotta figurine was amongst his most prized objects.1 These representations of the Sphinx testify to Freud’s broader fascination with Egyptian culture—a fascination which, as we have seen, manifests itself both in his writings and his collection of antiquities. Judith Butler and George Steiner have wondered: “what would happen if psychoanalysis were to have taken Antigone rather than Oedipus as its point of departure?”2 I want to reformulate their question to ask, what would happen if Freud had taken the Sphinx rather than Oedipus as his point of departure? With this counterfactual, I hope to deepen the exploration already undertaken in the previous two articles about Egypt as an origin myth for psychoanalysis—an origin both for the development of the self and for the history of humanity. One possibility, suggested by Edward Said in his last work, Freud and the Non European, is that Freud’s turn to Egypt opened psychoanalysis to a less Eurocentric perspective. For Said, Freud’s foregrounding of Egypt and his interest in the crossover of “non-European” and “European ” cultures testified to his openness and his frustration with the nationalist and racist theories which were so prevalent at the end of his life.3 Said’s claims are compelling but as he would have been the first to note, Freud’s Egyptomania could equally be captive to orientalizing fantasies.4 In what follows I trace the evidence for Freud’s fascination with Egypt and, reading it hieroglyphically (as he would invite us to do), I speculate about its possible impacts on psychoanalysis as art and / or science. Ingres’s first version of Oedipus and the Sphinx—the painting whose reproduction Freud displayed—was completed in 1808. Ingres originally painted the picture in Rome where Miriam Leonard 133 he was studying at the French Academy. In common with other students at the academy, Ingres was required to produce figure studies and the original version of this painting was focused on Oedipus and the representation of his bodily form. Ingres had asked his model to use the same pose as the classical statue of Hermes with the Sandal which is displayed in the Louvre. As François de Vergnette writes: “The clarity of the contours, the muted use of chiaroscuro and the slight surface relief given to the figure of Oedipus add an archaic flavor to the picture. This archaism had its roots in Ingres’s taste for Greek vases.”5 But it is the impact of a different Mediterranean culture which can be felt in Ingres’s depiction of Oedipus’ counterpart. While Oedipus embodies the Winckelmannian Hellenic ideal, the Sphinx is represented in all her oriental glory. Ingres painted this image just ten years after Napoleon had lead his troops and “savants” into Egypt. Napoleon’s Egyptian Campaign gave rise to a widespread fascination with ancient Egyptian culture and its impact on the arts was immense. In choosing to represent Oedipus in his encounter with the Sphinx, Ingres was able to draw on this new aesthetic of orientalism.6 Even before Napoleon ’s expedition, the Sphinx had become a potent visual representation of the mystery of ancient Egypt and of ancient Egypt as mystery. Ingres reworked this image during the course of his career and gave the Sphinx an ever greater prominence. In Ingres ’s depiction, the Sphinx’s orientalism...
MIRIAM LEONARD是让-奥古斯特-多米尼克·安格尔的新古典主义绘画《俄狄浦斯与斯芬克斯》的作品,这幅著名的作品悬挂在弗洛伊德位于伯格卡斯19号诊室的沙发上[图1]。没有人怀疑俄狄浦斯形象对弗洛伊德思想发展的重要性,2021年冬,让-奥古斯特-多米尼克·安格尔(1780-1867)。俄狄浦斯与斯芬克斯(1808年)布面油画。图片来源:Scala/ Art Resource, NY132弗洛伊德在俄狄浦斯和斯芬克斯之间的关系,但斯芬克斯在这张照片中的存在引发了一系列关于弗洛伊德兴趣的问题,这些问题还没有得到广泛的探讨。事实上,这远不是唯一的狮身人面像的描述,为弗洛伊德的研究增光添彩。吉萨狮身人面像的一幅大型蚀刻画陈列在他的书架上,一个陶俑是他最珍贵的物品之一狮身人面像的这些表现证明了弗洛伊德对埃及文化的广泛迷恋——正如我们所看到的,这种迷恋在他的著作和他的古董收藏中都表现出来。朱迪思·巴特勒和乔治·斯坦纳想知道:“如果精神分析学以安提戈涅而不是俄狄浦斯为出发点,会发生什么?”“我想重新提出他们的问题,如果弗洛伊德把斯芬克斯而不是俄狄浦斯作为他的出发点,会发生什么?”有了这个反事实,我希望加深前两篇关于埃及作为精神分析起源神话的探索——既是自我发展的起源,也是人类历史的起源。爱德华·赛义德(Edward Said)在他的最后一部作品《弗洛伊德与非欧洲人》(Freud and the Non - European)中提出的一种可能性是,弗洛伊德转向埃及为精神分析打开了一个不那么以欧洲为中心的视角。对于赛义德来说,弗洛伊德对埃及的展望以及他对“非欧洲”和“欧洲”文化交叉的兴趣证明了他的开放性和他对民族主义和种族主义理论的挫败感,这些理论在他生命的最后是如此盛行赛义德的说法令人信服,但正如他可能是第一个注意到的那样,弗洛伊德的埃及癖同样可能被东方化幻想所俘虏在接下来的文章中,我追溯了弗洛伊德对埃及着迷的证据,并以象形文字的方式阅读了它(正如他邀请我们做的那样),我推测了它对精神分析作为艺术和/或科学的可能影响。安格尔的第一版《俄狄浦斯与狮身人面像》完成于1808年,弗洛伊德展示了这幅画的复制品。安格尔最初是在罗马画这幅画的,当时他正在罗马的法国艺术学院学习。与学院的其他学生一样,安格尔被要求进行人物研究,这幅画的原始版本集中在俄狄浦斯和他的身体形式的表现上。安格尔要求他的模特使用与卢浮宫展出的经典的爱马仕和凉鞋雕像相同的姿势。弗朗索瓦写道:“轮廓的清晰,明暗对比的柔和使用以及俄狄浦斯形象的轻微表面浮雕为画面增添了一种古老的味道。”这个古语源于安格尔对希腊花瓶的喜爱。但是,在安格尔对俄狄浦斯的描写中,我们可以感受到一种不同的地中海文化的影响。俄狄浦斯体现了温克尔曼式的希腊理想,而狮身人面像则代表了她所有的东方荣耀。安格尔画这幅画时,拿破仑刚刚率领他的军队和“学者”进入埃及十年。拿破仑的埃及战役引起了对古埃及文化的广泛迷恋,它对艺术的影响是巨大的。安格尔选择描绘俄狄浦斯与狮身人面像相遇的场景,是为了利用这种东方主义的新美学甚至在拿破仑远征之前,狮身人面像就已经成为古埃及神秘和古埃及神秘的有力的视觉代表。安格尔在他的职业生涯中重新创作了这幅画,使狮身人面像更加突出。在安格尔的描绘中,狮身人面像的东方主义……
期刊介绍:
MORE THAN humane philology is essential for keeping the classics as a living force. Arion therefore exists to publish work that needs to be done and that otherwise might not get done. We want to stimulate, provoke, even "plant" work that now finds no encouragement or congenial home elsewhere. This means swimming against the mainstream, resisting the extremes of conventional philology and critical fashion into which the profession is now polarized. But occupying this vital center should in no way preclude the crucial centrifugal movement that may lead us across disciplinary lines and beyond the academy. Our commitment is to a genuine and generous pluralism that opens up rather than polarizes classical studies.