Impacts of Artificial Intelligence on Asset Management

Q4 Medicine
Matthew Balaban
{"title":"Impacts of Artificial Intelligence on Asset Management","authors":"Matthew Balaban","doi":"10.70251/hyjr2348.35987997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the asset management industry by enhancing investment strategy formulation, portfolio construction, and risk management. This study investigates the performance impacts of AI integration in asset management using a ten-year panel (2015–2024) of institutional fund holdings derived from SEC Form 13F filings via Whalewisdom. Funds were classified as traditional or quantitative based on turnover and holdings concentration, serving as proxies for AI adoption. Literature review findings reveal that leading institutions such as JPMorgan and BlackRock leverage AI for alternative data analysis, risk oversight, and hybrid human–machine decision-making. Results show that quantitative funds consistently exhibited higher volatility and greater market sensitivity (beta), while both fund types saw declining downside-adjusted performance (Sortino ratio). Notably, Sortino ratios converged over time, suggesting narrowing differences in downside-risk efficiency. Alpha was persistently negative for quantitative funds, indicating limited excess returns beyond market exposure. Overall performance differences were negligible except during the onset of COVID-19, when quantitative funds briefly outperformed. These findings highlight AI’s dual role as both a source of adaptability and a driver of higher systemic risk, underscoring the importance of governance and transparency in its deployment.","PeriodicalId":39687,"journal":{"name":"JK Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"987-997"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://doi.org/10.70251/hyjr2348.35987997","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JK Science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70251/hyjr2348.35987997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the asset management industry by enhancing investment strategy formulation, portfolio construction, and risk management. This study investigates the performance impacts of AI integration in asset management using a ten-year panel (2015–2024) of institutional fund holdings derived from SEC Form 13F filings via Whalewisdom. Funds were classified as traditional or quantitative based on turnover and holdings concentration, serving as proxies for AI adoption. Literature review findings reveal that leading institutions such as JPMorgan and BlackRock leverage AI for alternative data analysis, risk oversight, and hybrid human–machine decision-making. Results show that quantitative funds consistently exhibited higher volatility and greater market sensitivity (beta), while both fund types saw declining downside-adjusted performance (Sortino ratio). Notably, Sortino ratios converged over time, suggesting narrowing differences in downside-risk efficiency. Alpha was persistently negative for quantitative funds, indicating limited excess returns beyond market exposure. Overall performance differences were negligible except during the onset of COVID-19, when quantitative funds briefly outperformed. These findings highlight AI’s dual role as both a source of adaptability and a driver of higher systemic risk, underscoring the importance of governance and transparency in its deployment.
人工智能对资产管理的影响
人工智能(AI)通过加强投资策略制定、投资组合构建和风险管理,正在迅速改变资产管理行业。本研究调查了人工智能集成在资产管理中的绩效影响,使用了一个十年(2015-2024)的机构基金持股权小组,该小组来自Whalewisdom的SEC表格13F文件。根据成交量和持股集中度,基金被分为传统基金和定量基金,作为人工智能采用的代理。文献综述发现,摩根大通(JPMorgan)和贝莱德(BlackRock)等领先机构利用人工智能进行替代数据分析、风险监管和人机混合决策。结果表明,量化基金始终表现出更高的波动性和更大的市场敏感性(beta),而两种基金类型的下行调整绩效(Sortino比率)均有所下降。值得注意的是,随着时间的推移,Sortino比率趋于一致,表明下行风险效率的差异正在缩小。量化基金的Alpha值持续为负值,表明超出市场敞口的超额回报有限。总体表现差异可以忽略不计,除了在新冠肺炎爆发期间,量化基金的表现短暂优于其他基金。这些发现突出了人工智能的双重作用,既是适应性的来源,也是更高系统性风险的驱动因素,强调了人工智能部署中治理和透明度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JK Science
JK Science Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: "JK Science” is a multi-disciplinary, peer reviewed, open access medical journal being published quarterly from Jammu, J&K. It is a step & endeavour to satisfy the professional quest, collect & disseminate medical information & scientific knowledge about various current medical problems, update & increase the interaction among the medical fraternity in the larger interest of the suffering mankind. Besides other medical literature, this journal contains Editorial, Review Articles, Original Articles & various interesting Case Reports.“ JK Science” promises to be an important medical communication and journal of scientific excellence in the field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书