Comparison of Effective Optical Zone, Lenticule Decentration, and Corneal Aberrations Following KLEx Extraction Between the VisuMax 800 and VisuMax 500.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yishan Qian, Junjie Yu, Jing Zhao, Xingtao Zhou
{"title":"Comparison of Effective Optical Zone, Lenticule Decentration, and Corneal Aberrations Following KLEx Extraction Between the VisuMax 800 and VisuMax 500.","authors":"Yishan Qian, Junjie Yu, Jing Zhao, Xingtao Zhou","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20260224-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effective optical zone (EOZ), extent of lenticule decentration, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) after keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) using the VisuMax 800 and 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, matched case-control study controlled for programmed sphere (PS: ±0.25 diopters [D]), cylinder (PC: ±0.25 D), and optical zone (±0.1 mm). The EOZ and decentration values were obtained from the tangential topography difference map. The refractive outcomes and corneal HOAs were compared between the two platforms at the 3-month postoperative visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 right eyes of 95 patients who underwent KLEx using the VisuMax 800 and 95 patients using the VisuMax 500 were included. Both platforms are effective and safe for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism. No significant difference was found in the percentage reduction of EOZ between the two platforms (16.52 ± 4.53% vs 16.42 ± 4.60%, <i>P</i> = .637). Multiple linear regression revealed that, for both platforms, PS and mean keratometry were negatively correlated with the percentage reduction in EOZ, whereas PC was positively correlated with the percentage reduction in EOZ. The absolute values of the vertical decentration were significantly lower for the VisuMax 800 (0.14 ± 0.10 vs 0.21 ± 0.14 mm, <i>P</i> < .001). No significant differences in postoperative total HOAs, horizontal and vertical coma, or spherical aberration were found between the two platforms (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both platforms achieved good and comparable refractive, EOZ, and HOAs outcomes. The VisuMax 800 demonstrated higher centration accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"42 5","pages":"e453-e460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20260224-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effective optical zone (EOZ), extent of lenticule decentration, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) after keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) using the VisuMax 800 and 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG).

Methods: This was a prospective, matched case-control study controlled for programmed sphere (PS: ±0.25 diopters [D]), cylinder (PC: ±0.25 D), and optical zone (±0.1 mm). The EOZ and decentration values were obtained from the tangential topography difference map. The refractive outcomes and corneal HOAs were compared between the two platforms at the 3-month postoperative visit.

Results: A total of 95 right eyes of 95 patients who underwent KLEx using the VisuMax 800 and 95 patients using the VisuMax 500 were included. Both platforms are effective and safe for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism. No significant difference was found in the percentage reduction of EOZ between the two platforms (16.52 ± 4.53% vs 16.42 ± 4.60%, P = .637). Multiple linear regression revealed that, for both platforms, PS and mean keratometry were negatively correlated with the percentage reduction in EOZ, whereas PC was positively correlated with the percentage reduction in EOZ. The absolute values of the vertical decentration were significantly lower for the VisuMax 800 (0.14 ± 0.10 vs 0.21 ± 0.14 mm, P < .001). No significant differences in postoperative total HOAs, horizontal and vertical coma, or spherical aberration were found between the two platforms (P > .05).

Conclusions: Both platforms achieved good and comparable refractive, EOZ, and HOAs outcomes. The VisuMax 800 demonstrated higher centration accuracy.

VisuMax 800和VisuMax 500 KLEx提取后有效光学区、透镜离散和角膜像差的比较
目的:比较使用VisuMax 800和500(卡尔蔡司Meditec AG)角膜屈光性晶状体提取(KLEx)后的有效光学区(EOZ)、晶状体分散程度和角膜高阶像差(HOAs)。方法:这是一项前瞻性、匹配的病例对照研究,控制了程序球体(PS:±0.25屈光度[D])、圆柱体(PC:±0.25 D)和光学区(±0.1 mm)。EOZ和分散值由切向地形差线图获得。比较两个平台术后3个月的屈光结果和角膜hoa。结果:95例使用VisuMax 800和95例使用VisuMax 500行KLEx的患者共95只右眼。这两种平台对于治疗近视和散光都是有效和安全的。两种平台的EOZ减少百分比无显著差异(16.52±4.53% vs 16.42±4.60%,P = 0.637)。多元线性回归显示,在两个平台上,PS和平均角度数与EOZ减少百分比呈负相关,而PC与EOZ减少百分比呈正相关。VisuMax 800的垂直偏移绝对值明显低于前者(0.14±0.10 vs 0.21±0.14 mm, P < 0.001)。两平台术后总hoa、水平和垂直彗差、球差差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:两种平台的屈光、EOZ和hoa结果均良好且具有可比性。VisuMax 800具有更高的集中精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书