Psychosocial and Forensic Characteristics of Adult Mental Health Patients Referred to an Australian Secure Extended Care Unit and Predictors of Acceptance.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Partha Das, Emma Robertson, Victoria Harpwood, Stephanie Tierney
{"title":"Psychosocial and Forensic Characteristics of Adult Mental Health Patients Referred to an Australian Secure Extended Care Unit and Predictors of Acceptance.","authors":"Partha Das, Emma Robertson, Victoria Harpwood, Stephanie Tierney","doi":"10.1177/00207640261439746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Secure extended care units (SECUs) are low-secure locked inpatient units. They are considered the most restrictive intervention within the continuum of mental health rehabilitation programmes for patients within non-forensic public mental health services. Limited information about psychosocial and forensic aspects of patients referred to such units is available.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explored the psychosocial and forensic characteristics and predictors of acceptance in an Australian SECU programme over a 5-year period (2019-2023).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study design investigated 121 consecutive referrals. The 98 first-time patient referrals were included in the main analysis. Descriptive statistics were used with non-parametric comparisons (Chi-square and Fisher exact test where appropriate). Logistic regression was undertaken to assess the influence of covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Referral from an inpatient mental health setting was the only predictor that influenced acceptance onto the SECU (<i>OR</i> 3.168, 95% CI: [1.129, 8.913], <i>p</i> = .029). More than four-fifths had a forensic history. Only 14 % had a history of youth offending, but 73% had a past conviction before referral. Sixty percent had a history of Family violence and two-thirds were on Bail. Services prioritised containment and abstinence, whereas patients sought skills development and employment. Patients had least contact with a Psychologist among all allied health disciplines before referral.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provides evidence that the SECU is receiving patients with high forensic and psychosocial needs, which are unmet within community mental health programmes in the absence of medium and high-secure units. There is a need for a balanced approach between containment, rehabilitation, and community reintegration for this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1796-1806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13569903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640261439746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Secure extended care units (SECUs) are low-secure locked inpatient units. They are considered the most restrictive intervention within the continuum of mental health rehabilitation programmes for patients within non-forensic public mental health services. Limited information about psychosocial and forensic aspects of patients referred to such units is available.

Aim: This study explored the psychosocial and forensic characteristics and predictors of acceptance in an Australian SECU programme over a 5-year period (2019-2023).

Methods: A retrospective study design investigated 121 consecutive referrals. The 98 first-time patient referrals were included in the main analysis. Descriptive statistics were used with non-parametric comparisons (Chi-square and Fisher exact test where appropriate). Logistic regression was undertaken to assess the influence of covariates.

Results: Referral from an inpatient mental health setting was the only predictor that influenced acceptance onto the SECU (OR 3.168, 95% CI: [1.129, 8.913], p = .029). More than four-fifths had a forensic history. Only 14 % had a history of youth offending, but 73% had a past conviction before referral. Sixty percent had a history of Family violence and two-thirds were on Bail. Services prioritised containment and abstinence, whereas patients sought skills development and employment. Patients had least contact with a Psychologist among all allied health disciplines before referral.

Conclusions: The study provides evidence that the SECU is receiving patients with high forensic and psychosocial needs, which are unmet within community mental health programmes in the absence of medium and high-secure units. There is a need for a balanced approach between containment, rehabilitation, and community reintegration for this cohort.

转介到澳大利亚安全扩展护理单位的成年精神健康患者的社会心理和法医特征及其接受的预测因素。
安全扩展护理单位(secu)是低安全性锁定的住院单位。它们被认为是在非法医公共精神卫生服务机构为病人提供的连续精神卫生康复方案中最具限制性的干预措施。关于转介到这些单位的病人的社会心理和法医方面的资料有限。目的:本研究探讨了澳大利亚SECU项目在5年期间(2019-2023年)的社会心理和法医特征以及接受的预测因素。方法:采用回顾性研究设计对121例连续转诊患者进行调查。98例首次转诊患者纳入主要分析。描述性统计用于非参数比较(卡方检验和Fisher精确检验)。采用Logistic回归评估协变量的影响。结果:来自住院精神卫生机构的转诊是影响接受SECU的唯一预测因子(OR 3.168, 95% CI: [1.129, 8.913], p = 0.029)。超过五分之四的人有法医记录。只有14%的人有青少年犯罪史,但73%的人在转诊前有前科。60%的人有家庭暴力史,三分之二的人被保释。服务部门优先考虑遏制和禁欲,而患者则寻求技能发展和就业。在所有联合卫生学科中,患者在转诊前与心理学家的接触最少。结论:该研究提供的证据表明,在缺乏中等和高度安全单位的情况下,社区精神卫生方案无法满足有高度法医和心理社会需求的病人。需要对这一群体采取遏制、康复和重新融入社区之间的平衡办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书