Evaluation of continuous renal replacement therapy efficacy in severe caffeine intoxication: concentration-dependent variation in caffeine clearance.

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Saki Takeda, Haruki Chiba, Takeru Yamazaki, Yasuhiko Tsukada, Makoto Onodera, Ken Iseki, Kazuki Harada
{"title":"Evaluation of continuous renal replacement therapy efficacy in severe caffeine intoxication: concentration-dependent variation in caffeine clearance.","authors":"Saki Takeda, Haruki Chiba, Takeru Yamazaki, Yasuhiko Tsukada, Makoto Onodera, Ken Iseki, Kazuki Harada","doi":"10.1007/s13730-026-01127-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemodialysis is an effective treatment option for acute caffeine intoxication. However, the efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy remains a subject of debate. We encountered a case of acute caffeine intoxication that was managed using high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration. To evaluate the effectiveness of high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration, we compared it with other continuous renal replacement therapy approaches in managing cases of caffeine intoxication. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the caffeine-removal ability of continuous renal replacement therapy and assess its effectiveness. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the underlying reasons for the conflicting reports regarding the effectiveness of continuous renal replacement therapy. The time course of the blood caffeine concentration and elimination half-life were used for the evaluation. A woman in her 40s attempted suicide by ingesting an overdose of caffeine hydrate tablets. She presented with sweating, vomiting, tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, and tremors. The serum caffeine concentration in this case decreased from 103 to 50 μg/mL after high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration. The initial symptoms at the time of admission also disappeared post-treatment. Caffeine clearance by continuous renal replacement therapy may vary depending on the blood caffeine concentration, and this concentration-dependent variation may lead to discrepancies in the evaluation of continuous renal replacement therapy. The discrepancies in the ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy were likely attributable to the selection of inappropriate comparators. We inferred that continuous renal replacement therapy provides a therapeutic benefit because continuous renal replacement therapy may facilitate caffeine clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9697,"journal":{"name":"CEN Case Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13168395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEN Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13730-026-01127-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemodialysis is an effective treatment option for acute caffeine intoxication. However, the efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy remains a subject of debate. We encountered a case of acute caffeine intoxication that was managed using high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration. To evaluate the effectiveness of high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration, we compared it with other continuous renal replacement therapy approaches in managing cases of caffeine intoxication. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the caffeine-removal ability of continuous renal replacement therapy and assess its effectiveness. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the underlying reasons for the conflicting reports regarding the effectiveness of continuous renal replacement therapy. The time course of the blood caffeine concentration and elimination half-life were used for the evaluation. A woman in her 40s attempted suicide by ingesting an overdose of caffeine hydrate tablets. She presented with sweating, vomiting, tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, and tremors. The serum caffeine concentration in this case decreased from 103 to 50 μg/mL after high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration. The initial symptoms at the time of admission also disappeared post-treatment. Caffeine clearance by continuous renal replacement therapy may vary depending on the blood caffeine concentration, and this concentration-dependent variation may lead to discrepancies in the evaluation of continuous renal replacement therapy. The discrepancies in the ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy were likely attributable to the selection of inappropriate comparators. We inferred that continuous renal replacement therapy provides a therapeutic benefit because continuous renal replacement therapy may facilitate caffeine clearance.

重度咖啡因中毒持续肾脏替代治疗的疗效评价:咖啡因清除率的浓度依赖性变化。
血液透析是急性咖啡因中毒的有效治疗选择。然而,持续肾替代治疗的疗效仍然是一个有争议的话题。我们遇到了一个病例的急性咖啡因中毒,是管理使用高流量连续血液滤过。为了评估高流量连续血液滤过术的有效性,我们将其与其他连续肾脏替代疗法在治疗咖啡因中毒病例中的效果进行了比较。在这项研究中,我们旨在阐明持续肾脏替代疗法的咖啡因去除能力并评估其有效性。此外,我们的目的是调查关于持续肾脏替代治疗有效性的相互矛盾的报告的潜在原因。用血中咖啡因浓度的时间过程和消除半衰期进行评价。一名40多岁的妇女试图通过摄入过量的咖啡因水合剂来自杀。她表现为出汗,呕吐,心动过速,窦性心动过速和颤抖。高流量连续血液滤过后,患者血清咖啡因浓度由103 μg/mL降至50 μg/mL。入院时的症状在治疗后也消失了。持续肾替代疗法对咖啡因的清除率可能因血中咖啡因浓度而异,这种浓度依赖性的变化可能导致对持续肾替代疗法的评价存在差异。关于持续肾替代治疗疗效的争论中出现的差异很可能是由于选择了不适当的比较物。我们推断,持续肾替代疗法提供了治疗益处,因为持续肾替代疗法可以促进咖啡因的清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CEN Case Reports
CEN Case Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology (CEN) Case Reports is a peer-reviewed online-only journal, officially published biannually by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN).  The journal publishes original case reports in nephrology and related areas.  The purpose of CEN Case Reports is to provide clinicians and researchers with a forum in which to disseminate their personal experience to a wide readership and to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world, from whom contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书