The danger zone: The joint trap of incomplete lineage sorting and long-branch attraction in resolving the Gondwanan origin of Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
American Journal of Botany Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-12 DOI:10.1002/ajb2.70201
Liming Cai, Natalia Pabón-Mora, Juan F Alzate, Liang Liu, Charles C Davis
{"title":"The danger zone: The joint trap of incomplete lineage sorting and long-branch attraction in resolving the Gondwanan origin of Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae.","authors":"Liming Cai, Natalia Pabón-Mora, Juan F Alzate, Liang Liu, Charles C Davis","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>Rafflesiaceae (Malpighiales) is an iconic parasitic plant clade of species that occur west of Wallace's line in tropical Southeast Asia. This clade has been notoriously difficult to place phylogenetically and is nested within an explosive ancient radiation in Malpighiales, rendering one of the thorniest nodes across the angiosperm Tree of Life. The parasitic family Apodanthaceae has recently been positioned as sister to Rafflesiaceae, offering hope of stabilizing their placements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, using a data set of 2135 genes and complex methods for species tree inference, we aimed to resolve the phylogenetic placement and divergence time of Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae. We also applied computational simulation to investigate the impact of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and long-branch attraction on resolving this ancient radiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clade comprising Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae was variously placed with Euphorbiaceae, Peraceae, Putranjivaceae, and Pandaceae by coalescent and concatenation methods. Such unstable placements appear to be the result of excessive levels of rate heterogeneity and ILS, which contribute to a phylogenetic \"danger zone\" where simulation suggests that current methods and genomic data may never provide a tidy species tree.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the topological uncertainty, our divergence time estimation identified a mid-Cretaceous origin of stem group Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae, not only making them the oldest parasitic plant lineage reported to date, but also suggesting a likely Gondwana vicariance scenario that explains their initial disjunct distribution in Northern India, Australia, South America, and Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e70201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise: Rafflesiaceae (Malpighiales) is an iconic parasitic plant clade of species that occur west of Wallace's line in tropical Southeast Asia. This clade has been notoriously difficult to place phylogenetically and is nested within an explosive ancient radiation in Malpighiales, rendering one of the thorniest nodes across the angiosperm Tree of Life. The parasitic family Apodanthaceae has recently been positioned as sister to Rafflesiaceae, offering hope of stabilizing their placements.

Methods: Here, using a data set of 2135 genes and complex methods for species tree inference, we aimed to resolve the phylogenetic placement and divergence time of Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae. We also applied computational simulation to investigate the impact of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and long-branch attraction on resolving this ancient radiation.

Results: The clade comprising Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae was variously placed with Euphorbiaceae, Peraceae, Putranjivaceae, and Pandaceae by coalescent and concatenation methods. Such unstable placements appear to be the result of excessive levels of rate heterogeneity and ILS, which contribute to a phylogenetic "danger zone" where simulation suggests that current methods and genomic data may never provide a tidy species tree.

Conclusions: Despite the topological uncertainty, our divergence time estimation identified a mid-Cretaceous origin of stem group Rafflesiaceae and Apodanthaceae, not only making them the oldest parasitic plant lineage reported to date, but also suggesting a likely Gondwana vicariance scenario that explains their initial disjunct distribution in Northern India, Australia, South America, and Africa.

危险地带:不完全谱系分选和长枝吸引联合陷阱在解决蛇麻科和蛇麻科冈瓦纳起源中的作用。
前提:莱佛士科(malpiighiales)是东南亚热带华莱士线以西的一个标志性寄生植物分支。众所周知,这个分支很难在系统发育上进行定位,它嵌套在Malpighiales的一个爆炸的古代辐射中,是被子植物生命树上最棘手的节点之一。寄生科天门铁科最近被定位为莱佛士科的姐妹,为稳定它们的位置提供了希望。方法:利用2135个基因数据集,采用复杂的种树推理方法,对来福科和天花科植物的系统发育定位和分化时间进行分析。我们还应用计算模拟研究了不完全谱系分选(ILS)和长枝吸引对解决这一古老辐射的影响。结果:采用聚结和串联的方法,将莱菔子科和天菖蒲科与大戟科、peroaceae、putranjivacae科和Pandaceae进行了不同的排序。这种不稳定的位置似乎是过度的速率异质性和ILS的结果,这导致了系统发育的“危险区域”,模拟表明,目前的方法和基因组数据可能永远不会提供一个整齐的物种树。结论:尽管拓扑结构存在不确定性,但我们的分化时间估计确定了茎类Rafflesiaceae和Apodanthaceae起源于白垩纪中期,这不仅使它们成为迄今为止报道的最古老的寄生植物谱系,而且还暗示了一种可能的冈瓦纳突变情景,解释了它们最初在印度北部、澳大利亚、南美洲和非洲的分离分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书