Top-Down and Bottom-Up Effects on Insect Herbivores Under Global Change-A Meta-Analysis.

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1111/ele.70386
Mayra C Vidal, Mattheau S Comerford, Billie Maguire, Shannon M Murphy
{"title":"Top-Down and Bottom-Up Effects on Insect Herbivores Under Global Change-A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mayra C Vidal, Mattheau S Comerford, Billie Maguire, Shannon M Murphy","doi":"10.1111/ele.70386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global environmental change is driving widespread insect declines, yet underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, particularly when mediated by trophic interactions. Many studies purportedly test global change stressors on insect herbivores mediated via their host plants (bottom-up) and natural enemies (top-down), but we lack a comprehensive understanding of overall effects. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 246 papers testing 18 distinct global change stressors impacting insect herbivores via trophic interactions. We found variable, often opposing impacts of global change stressors on herbivore fitness when herbivores and their host plants were exposed, while the only detected significant effect involving natural enemies was a reduced herbivore fitness under warming, potentially due to increased enemy attacks. Notably, generalists exhibited greater vulnerability to global change than specialists, challenging assumptions that dietary generalists are more resilient. Insect herbivores tested in agricultural systems were more prone to be benefited by global change, whereas closed experimental systems amplified negative outcomes. Our results underscore the importance of considering trophic interactions and context-specific dynamics in predicting ecological responses to environmental change. By integrating bottom-up and top-down mechanisms, our study provides a nuanced quantitative understanding of how global change influences insect herbivores, with important implications for biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70386"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13161830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global environmental change is driving widespread insect declines, yet underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, particularly when mediated by trophic interactions. Many studies purportedly test global change stressors on insect herbivores mediated via their host plants (bottom-up) and natural enemies (top-down), but we lack a comprehensive understanding of overall effects. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 246 papers testing 18 distinct global change stressors impacting insect herbivores via trophic interactions. We found variable, often opposing impacts of global change stressors on herbivore fitness when herbivores and their host plants were exposed, while the only detected significant effect involving natural enemies was a reduced herbivore fitness under warming, potentially due to increased enemy attacks. Notably, generalists exhibited greater vulnerability to global change than specialists, challenging assumptions that dietary generalists are more resilient. Insect herbivores tested in agricultural systems were more prone to be benefited by global change, whereas closed experimental systems amplified negative outcomes. Our results underscore the importance of considering trophic interactions and context-specific dynamics in predicting ecological responses to environmental change. By integrating bottom-up and top-down mechanisms, our study provides a nuanced quantitative understanding of how global change influences insect herbivores, with important implications for biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene.

全球变化下昆虫食草性自上而下和自下而上的影响——meta分析
全球环境变化正在推动昆虫的广泛减少,但潜在的机制仍然知之甚少,特别是当营养相互作用介导时。许多研究据称测试了通过寄主植物(自下而上)和天敌(自上而下)介导的全球变化应激源对食草昆虫的影响,但我们缺乏对整体影响的全面理解。在这里,我们对246篇论文进行了荟萃分析,测试了18种不同的全球变化压力源通过营养相互作用影响食草昆虫。我们发现,当食草动物及其寄主植物暴露时,全球变化应激源对食草动物适应性的影响是可变的,通常是相反的,而唯一发现的涉及天敌的显著影响是在变暖下食草动物适应性的降低,这可能是由于敌人攻击的增加。值得注意的是,多面手比专家更容易受到全球变化的影响,这挑战了饮食多面手更有弹性的假设。在农业系统中测试的食草昆虫更容易从全球变化中受益,而封闭的实验系统则放大了负面结果。我们的研究结果强调了在预测生态对环境变化的反应时考虑营养相互作用和情境特定动力学的重要性。通过整合自下而上和自上而下的机制,我们的研究为全球变化如何影响昆虫食草动物提供了细致入微的定量理解,对人类世的生物多样性保护具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书