Cost-efficient and Accurate Risk Assessment Instruments in Type 2 Diabetics with Greatest Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-16 DOI:10.26502/fccm.92920485
Meghana Kaipa, Devendra K Agrawal
{"title":"Cost-efficient and Accurate Risk Assessment Instruments in Type 2 Diabetics with Greatest Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Meghana Kaipa, Devendra K Agrawal","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death among individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To better direct preventative care, many risk assessment tools have been developed to determine whether T2DM patients will develop cardiovascular disease. This paper analyzes three specific tools: UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study), the Framingham Risk Score, and the QRISK (QRESEARCH cardiovascular risk algorithm) calculator, with a focus on their predictive utility and limitations in clinical practice. All these models were designed using a variety of patient information, including demographics, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure values; however, each has its own drawbacks. The UKPDS is based on an outdated study and does not account for patients with a history of baseline heart disease. The Framingham Risk Score is less accurate when determining the risk of cardiovascular events in underserved populations, as the database it was developed from lacks sufficient representation of these groups. While the QRISK calculator incorporates additional patient factors to better address the gaps of previous tools, resulting in more accurate predictions, none of these tools are perfectly individualized. Patient data is constantly changing, highlighting the need for models that utilize machine learning algorithms. Such approaches allow for greater adaptability and can integrate data from biomarkers and continuous glucose monitoring devices. Improving the accessibility and implementation of these newer tools is essential to better address existing healthcare gaps and enhance preventative care in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"10 2","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13155437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death among individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To better direct preventative care, many risk assessment tools have been developed to determine whether T2DM patients will develop cardiovascular disease. This paper analyzes three specific tools: UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study), the Framingham Risk Score, and the QRISK (QRESEARCH cardiovascular risk algorithm) calculator, with a focus on their predictive utility and limitations in clinical practice. All these models were designed using a variety of patient information, including demographics, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure values; however, each has its own drawbacks. The UKPDS is based on an outdated study and does not account for patients with a history of baseline heart disease. The Framingham Risk Score is less accurate when determining the risk of cardiovascular events in underserved populations, as the database it was developed from lacks sufficient representation of these groups. While the QRISK calculator incorporates additional patient factors to better address the gaps of previous tools, resulting in more accurate predictions, none of these tools are perfectly individualized. Patient data is constantly changing, highlighting the need for models that utilize machine learning algorithms. Such approaches allow for greater adaptability and can integrate data from biomarkers and continuous glucose monitoring devices. Improving the accessibility and implementation of these newer tools is essential to better address existing healthcare gaps and enhance preventative care in high-risk populations.

成本效益和准确的风险评估工具在2型糖尿病与心血管疾病的最大风险。
心血管疾病仍然是2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者死亡的主要原因。为了更好地直接预防护理,人们开发了许多风险评估工具来确定T2DM患者是否会发展为心血管疾病。本文分析了英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)、Framingham风险评分(Framingham Risk Score)和QRISK (QRESEARCH心血管风险算法)计算器这三种具体工具,重点分析了它们在临床实践中的预测效用和局限性。所有这些模型都是使用各种患者信息设计的,包括人口统计数据、胆固醇水平和血压值;然而,每种方法都有自己的缺点。UKPDS是基于一项过时的研究,没有考虑到有基线心脏病史的患者。Framingham风险评分在确定服务不足人群的心血管事件风险时不太准确,因为它所基于的数据库缺乏对这些群体的充分代表。虽然QRISK计算器纳入了额外的患者因素,以更好地解决以前工具的差距,从而获得更准确的预测,但这些工具都没有完全个性化。患者数据不断变化,这凸显了对利用机器学习算法的模型的需求。这种方法具有更大的适应性,可以整合来自生物标志物和连续血糖监测设备的数据。改善这些新工具的可及性和实施,对于更好地解决现有的卫生保健差距和加强高危人群的预防性保健至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书