Before Utility: The MingKwai Typewriter as Democratic Alternative.

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Miaofeng Yao
{"title":"Before Utility: The MingKwai Typewriter as Democratic Alternative.","authors":"Miaofeng Yao","doi":"10.1353/tech.2026.a988850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Against narratives that equate technological significance with efficiency, scale, or commercial success, this article reframes Lin Yutang's 1947 MingKwai () Chinese typewriter as a deliberate rejection of utility-driven design. Rather than interpreting the MingKwai as a precursor to later digital systems or China's contemporary information infrastructure, the article situates the device within Lin's intellectual project and historical context. It argues that the MingKwai's design-deeply rooted in existing technical precedents and Lin's \"living philosophy\"-sought to bridge writer and typist, expand access to writing, and resist subordination to both machine logic and state authority. The article presents the MingKwai as a democratic alternative within twentieth-century Chinese technological thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"67 2","pages":"371-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2026.a988850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against narratives that equate technological significance with efficiency, scale, or commercial success, this article reframes Lin Yutang's 1947 MingKwai () Chinese typewriter as a deliberate rejection of utility-driven design. Rather than interpreting the MingKwai as a precursor to later digital systems or China's contemporary information infrastructure, the article situates the device within Lin's intellectual project and historical context. It argues that the MingKwai's design-deeply rooted in existing technical precedents and Lin's "living philosophy"-sought to bridge writer and typist, expand access to writing, and resist subordination to both machine logic and state authority. The article presents the MingKwai as a democratic alternative within twentieth-century Chinese technological thought.

在公用事业之前:明葵打字机是民主的选择。
本文反对将技术意义等同于效率、规模或商业成功的叙述,将林语堂1947年的明贵中文打字机重新定义为对实用驱动设计的刻意拒绝。这篇文章并没有将鸣桂解读为后来数字系统或中国当代信息基础设施的先驱,而是将鸣桂置于林的思想计划和历史背景中。它认为明桂的设计——深深植根于现有的技术先例和林的“生活哲学”——试图在作家和打字员之间架起一座桥梁,扩大写作的渠道,并抵制机器逻辑和国家权威的屈从。本文认为,明桂是20世纪中国技术思想中的一种民主选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书