Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Child Behaviour Checklist in the ABCD Study.

IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kane Pavlovich, Toby Constable, Alex Fornito, Jeggan Tiego
{"title":"Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Child Behaviour Checklist in the ABCD Study.","authors":"Kane Pavlovich, Toby Constable, Alex Fornito, Jeggan Tiego","doi":"10.1111/desc.70216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used measure of psychopathology in developmental research and serves as the primary measure in the landmark Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (N = 11,861; 8-11 years). However, its psychometric properties in this sample have not been assessed in detail. Analyses using a multi-method framework (CFA, B-CFA, FMM, IRT, ESEM) indicate that a commonly used bifactor structure of the CBCL does not fit the data and instead the scale can be adequately described as unidimensional. Moreover, seven of eight subscales demonstrate insufficient construct validity and are not valid indicators of any higher-order models. All exhibit poor measurement precision below the mean of the latent traits, and item-level exploratory methods produce unstable factors with weak discriminant validity. These findings suggest caution in using the CBCL for dimensional measurement in this dataset and highlight the need for measures explicitly developed and validated for dimensional psychopathology in population-scale research. SUMMARY: The CBCL is a widely used measure of child and adolescent psychopathology, but its psychometric properties in the ABCD study cohort remain unclear. Using a multi-method approach we show that the CBCL is unidimensional and is not well represented by the commonly used bifactor model. CBCL subscales demonstrate insufficient construct validity and demonstrate poor measurement precision across the latent trait continuum. In combination, our findings caution against the use of the CBCL for dimensional measurement of developmental psychopathology in the ABCD study cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 4","pages":"e70216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13158641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used measure of psychopathology in developmental research and serves as the primary measure in the landmark Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (N = 11,861; 8-11 years). However, its psychometric properties in this sample have not been assessed in detail. Analyses using a multi-method framework (CFA, B-CFA, FMM, IRT, ESEM) indicate that a commonly used bifactor structure of the CBCL does not fit the data and instead the scale can be adequately described as unidimensional. Moreover, seven of eight subscales demonstrate insufficient construct validity and are not valid indicators of any higher-order models. All exhibit poor measurement precision below the mean of the latent traits, and item-level exploratory methods produce unstable factors with weak discriminant validity. These findings suggest caution in using the CBCL for dimensional measurement in this dataset and highlight the need for measures explicitly developed and validated for dimensional psychopathology in population-scale research. SUMMARY: The CBCL is a widely used measure of child and adolescent psychopathology, but its psychometric properties in the ABCD study cohort remain unclear. Using a multi-method approach we show that the CBCL is unidimensional and is not well represented by the commonly used bifactor model. CBCL subscales demonstrate insufficient construct validity and demonstrate poor measurement precision across the latent trait continuum. In combination, our findings caution against the use of the CBCL for dimensional measurement of developmental psychopathology in the ABCD study cohort.

评估ABCD研究中儿童行为检查表的心理测量特性。
儿童行为检查表(Child behavior Checklist, CBCL)是发展研究中广泛使用的精神病理学测量方法,也是具有里程碑意义的青少年大脑认知发展研究(N = 11,861; 8-11岁)的主要测量方法。然而,在这个样本中,它的心理测量特性还没有被详细评估。使用多方法框架(CFA, B-CFA, FMM, IRT, ESEM)的分析表明,常用的CBCL双因素结构不适合数据,相反,量表可以充分描述为一维。此外,8个子量表中有7个子量表的结构效度不够,不能作为任何高阶模型的有效指标。这些方法的测量精度均低于潜在特征的平均值,而且项目水平的探索性方法产生了不稳定因素,区分效度较弱。这些发现表明,在本数据集中使用CBCL进行维度测量时要谨慎,并强调需要在人群尺度研究中明确开发和验证维度精神病理学的测量方法。摘要:CBCL是一种广泛使用的儿童和青少年精神病理学测量方法,但其在ABCD研究队列中的心理测量特性尚不清楚。使用多方法方法,我们证明了CBCL是一维的,并且不能很好地用常用的双因子模型表示。CBCL子量表在潜在特质连续体上的构念效度不足,测量精度较差。综上所述,我们的研究结果提醒我们不要在ABCD研究队列中使用CBCL来测量发育性精神病理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书