Blood-Based Biomarkers and Cognitive-Behavioral Assessment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.

IF 1.9 Q3 Medicine
Korean Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2026-04-21 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.13004/kjnt.2026.22.e16
Dong-Wan Kang
{"title":"Blood-Based Biomarkers and Cognitive-Behavioral Assessment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.","authors":"Dong-Wan Kang","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2026.22.e16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) comprises the majority of all traumatic brain injuries, but clinical evaluation remains challenging because conventional neuroimaging cannot adequately detect subtle structural abnormalities or explain functional disturbances. Blood-based biomarkers have been studied as indicators of tissue injury. They may help reduce unnecessary computed tomography scans and predict unfavorable outcomes. However, biomarkers still have limitations in accurately assessing cognitive and behavioral abnormalities. Cognitive and behavioral evaluation helps characterize the functional consequences of mTBI, including impairments in attention, memory, executive function, and emotional symptoms. Although a range of cognitive and behavioral assessment tools is available, their interpretation is also influenced by factors such as timing, comorbidities, and patient effort. Taken together, blood-based biomarkers and cognitive and behavioral assessment should be interpreted in combination to allow a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients with mTBI. In this review, we summarize blood-based biomarkers and cognitive and behavioral assessment tools in mTBI, discuss their limitations, and propose an integrated approach to support more precise and individualized patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"22 2","pages":"103-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2026.22.e16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) comprises the majority of all traumatic brain injuries, but clinical evaluation remains challenging because conventional neuroimaging cannot adequately detect subtle structural abnormalities or explain functional disturbances. Blood-based biomarkers have been studied as indicators of tissue injury. They may help reduce unnecessary computed tomography scans and predict unfavorable outcomes. However, biomarkers still have limitations in accurately assessing cognitive and behavioral abnormalities. Cognitive and behavioral evaluation helps characterize the functional consequences of mTBI, including impairments in attention, memory, executive function, and emotional symptoms. Although a range of cognitive and behavioral assessment tools is available, their interpretation is also influenced by factors such as timing, comorbidities, and patient effort. Taken together, blood-based biomarkers and cognitive and behavioral assessment should be interpreted in combination to allow a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients with mTBI. In this review, we summarize blood-based biomarkers and cognitive and behavioral assessment tools in mTBI, discuss their limitations, and propose an integrated approach to support more precise and individualized patient management.

基于血液的生物标志物和轻度创伤性脑损伤的认知行为评估:目前的证据和临床观点。
轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)占所有创伤性脑损伤的大部分,但临床评估仍然具有挑战性,因为传统的神经影像学不能充分检测细微的结构异常或解释功能障碍。基于血液的生物标志物已被研究作为组织损伤的指标。它们可能有助于减少不必要的计算机断层扫描和预测不利的结果。然而,生物标志物在准确评估认知和行为异常方面仍有局限性。认知和行为评估有助于表征mTBI的功能后果,包括注意力、记忆、执行功能和情绪症状的损害。尽管一系列认知和行为评估工具是可用的,但它们的解释也受到诸如时间、合并症和患者努力等因素的影响。总的来说,基于血液的生物标志物和认知和行为评估应该结合起来解释,以便对mTBI患者进行更全面的评估。在这篇综述中,我们总结了mTBI中基于血液的生物标志物和认知和行为评估工具,讨论了它们的局限性,并提出了一种综合方法来支持更精确和个性化的患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书