Impact of a structured remediation program on academic performance of family medicine residents in difficulty: A training centre experience.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121261448293
Malak A Al Shammari
{"title":"Impact of a structured remediation program on academic performance of family medicine residents in difficulty: A training centre experience.","authors":"Malak A Al Shammari","doi":"10.1177/20503121261448293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residents in difficulty represent a significant challenge in postgraduate medical education. Early, structured remediation may improve academic and clinical performance, yet regional evidence from family medicine training programs remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured remediation program on examination performance and clinical assessments of family medicine residents in difficulty, and to explore resident-perceived mechanisms contributing to improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was conducted at a single accredited family medicine training center over three academic years (2022-2025). Quantitative analysis included a retrospective review of promotion examination scores and clinical assessment outcomes before and after participation in a standardized remediation program. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with participating residents and analyzed thematically. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Stuart-Maxwell test, and multivariable linear regression were used to assess performance changes and predictors of post-course outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one first-year family medicine residents were included. Mean promotion examination scores improved significantly from 55.1 ± 2.4 pre-course to 79.0 ± 5.1 post-course (p < 0.0001). Clinical assessment outcomes improved from universal borderline or failing status to 100% pass rates (p = 0.0009). Perceived exam difficulty decreased significantly following remediation (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that age, gender, and training sector were independently associated with post-course scores. Qualitative analysis identified five key themes underlying improvement: transformation of learning strategies, enhanced clinical exposure, mentorship support, feedback-driven reflection, and professional accountability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured remediation program was associated with significant improvements in academic performance, clinical competence, and learner confidence among family medicine residents in difficulty. Early, supportive, and mentorship-driven remediation may represent an important component of postgraduate family medicine training.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"20503121261448293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261448293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residents in difficulty represent a significant challenge in postgraduate medical education. Early, structured remediation may improve academic and clinical performance, yet regional evidence from family medicine training programs remains limited.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a structured remediation program on examination performance and clinical assessments of family medicine residents in difficulty, and to explore resident-perceived mechanisms contributing to improvement.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted at a single accredited family medicine training center over three academic years (2022-2025). Quantitative analysis included a retrospective review of promotion examination scores and clinical assessment outcomes before and after participation in a standardized remediation program. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with participating residents and analyzed thematically. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Stuart-Maxwell test, and multivariable linear regression were used to assess performance changes and predictors of post-course outcomes.

Results: Thirty-one first-year family medicine residents were included. Mean promotion examination scores improved significantly from 55.1 ± 2.4 pre-course to 79.0 ± 5.1 post-course (p < 0.0001). Clinical assessment outcomes improved from universal borderline or failing status to 100% pass rates (p = 0.0009). Perceived exam difficulty decreased significantly following remediation (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that age, gender, and training sector were independently associated with post-course scores. Qualitative analysis identified five key themes underlying improvement: transformation of learning strategies, enhanced clinical exposure, mentorship support, feedback-driven reflection, and professional accountability.

Conclusion: A structured remediation program was associated with significant improvements in academic performance, clinical competence, and learner confidence among family medicine residents in difficulty. Early, supportive, and mentorship-driven remediation may represent an important component of postgraduate family medicine training.

一个结构化的补救计划对家庭医学困难住院医师学业成绩的影响:一个培训中心的经验。
背景:困难住院医师是研究生医学教育面临的重大挑战。早期,有组织的补救措施可能会提高学术和临床表现,但来自家庭医学培训计划的区域证据仍然有限。目的:评估一项结构化的补救方案对家庭医学困难住院医师考试成绩和临床评估的影响,并探讨住院医师对改善的感知机制。方法:在一家经认证的家庭医学培训中心进行混合方法研究,研究时间为3学年(2022-2025)。定量分析包括参与标准化补救计划前后的晋升考试分数和临床评估结果的回顾性回顾。通过对参与调查的居民进行半结构化访谈获得定性数据,并进行主题分析。采用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验、Stuart-Maxwell检验和多变量线性回归评估成绩变化和课程后结局的预测因素。结果:纳入31名家庭医学第一年住院医师。平均晋升考试成绩由课程前的55.1±2.4分显著提高至课程后的79.0±5.1分(p < 0.0001)。临床评估结果从普遍的边缘或不合格状态改善到100%的通过率(p = 0.0009)。认知考试难度在补习后显著降低(p < 0.0001)。多变量分析显示,年龄、性别和培训部门与课程后成绩独立相关。定性分析确定了改善的五个关键主题:学习策略的转变,增强临床暴露,指导支持,反馈驱动的反思和专业责任。结论:有组织的补习课程能显著提高家庭医学困难住院医师的学业成绩、临床能力和学习信心。早期、支持性和指导导向的补救措施可能是研究生家庭医学培训的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书