{"title":"Impact of a structured remediation program on academic performance of family medicine residents in difficulty: A training centre experience.","authors":"Malak A Al Shammari","doi":"10.1177/20503121261448293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residents in difficulty represent a significant challenge in postgraduate medical education. Early, structured remediation may improve academic and clinical performance, yet regional evidence from family medicine training programs remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured remediation program on examination performance and clinical assessments of family medicine residents in difficulty, and to explore resident-perceived mechanisms contributing to improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was conducted at a single accredited family medicine training center over three academic years (2022-2025). Quantitative analysis included a retrospective review of promotion examination scores and clinical assessment outcomes before and after participation in a standardized remediation program. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with participating residents and analyzed thematically. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Stuart-Maxwell test, and multivariable linear regression were used to assess performance changes and predictors of post-course outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one first-year family medicine residents were included. Mean promotion examination scores improved significantly from 55.1 ± 2.4 pre-course to 79.0 ± 5.1 post-course (p < 0.0001). Clinical assessment outcomes improved from universal borderline or failing status to 100% pass rates (p = 0.0009). Perceived exam difficulty decreased significantly following remediation (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that age, gender, and training sector were independently associated with post-course scores. Qualitative analysis identified five key themes underlying improvement: transformation of learning strategies, enhanced clinical exposure, mentorship support, feedback-driven reflection, and professional accountability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured remediation program was associated with significant improvements in academic performance, clinical competence, and learner confidence among family medicine residents in difficulty. Early, supportive, and mentorship-driven remediation may represent an important component of postgraduate family medicine training.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"20503121261448293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261448293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Residents in difficulty represent a significant challenge in postgraduate medical education. Early, structured remediation may improve academic and clinical performance, yet regional evidence from family medicine training programs remains limited.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a structured remediation program on examination performance and clinical assessments of family medicine residents in difficulty, and to explore resident-perceived mechanisms contributing to improvement.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted at a single accredited family medicine training center over three academic years (2022-2025). Quantitative analysis included a retrospective review of promotion examination scores and clinical assessment outcomes before and after participation in a standardized remediation program. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with participating residents and analyzed thematically. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Stuart-Maxwell test, and multivariable linear regression were used to assess performance changes and predictors of post-course outcomes.
Results: Thirty-one first-year family medicine residents were included. Mean promotion examination scores improved significantly from 55.1 ± 2.4 pre-course to 79.0 ± 5.1 post-course (p < 0.0001). Clinical assessment outcomes improved from universal borderline or failing status to 100% pass rates (p = 0.0009). Perceived exam difficulty decreased significantly following remediation (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that age, gender, and training sector were independently associated with post-course scores. Qualitative analysis identified five key themes underlying improvement: transformation of learning strategies, enhanced clinical exposure, mentorship support, feedback-driven reflection, and professional accountability.
Conclusion: A structured remediation program was associated with significant improvements in academic performance, clinical competence, and learner confidence among family medicine residents in difficulty. Early, supportive, and mentorship-driven remediation may represent an important component of postgraduate family medicine training.