Methods to Quantify Suppression in Amblyopia: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shakthi Pradheepa Periakaruppan, Krishnaveni Nagarajan, Debkuntal Sen, PremNandhini Satgunam
{"title":"Methods to Quantify Suppression in Amblyopia: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Shakthi Pradheepa Periakaruppan, Krishnaveni Nagarajan, Debkuntal Sen, PremNandhini Satgunam","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2026.2671406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Suppression is the cortical inhibition of visual information from one eye. This scoping review identifies and collates the different methods, techniques, and tools used to measure and quantify suppression in the clinical management of amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRISMAScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Reviews) guidelines were followed to include peer-reviewed papers that describe methods to quantify suppression in patients with amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 75 included papers, results show that suppression quantification is feasible in children as young as 3-years old. Only three randomized clinical trials have used suppression as a quantified outcome measure. Methodologies are broadly categorized by target size, electrophysiology, or contrast. Common clinical tools are primarily size-based (e.g. the worth four-dot test at varying distances) or contrast-based (e.g. neutral density filters). Conversely, most experimental assessments are software-driven contrast-based paradigms such as dichoptic motion coherence tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical implementation of suppression quantification remains limited. However, available clinical tools for quantifying suppression on a fine-graded continuous scale are minimal. Such finer tools for the quantification of suppression are used in lab-based research and are yet to be made commercially available. Future studies should focus on developing better clinical tools for quantifying suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2026.2671406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Suppression is the cortical inhibition of visual information from one eye. This scoping review identifies and collates the different methods, techniques, and tools used to measure and quantify suppression in the clinical management of amblyopia.

Methods: PRISMAScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Reviews) guidelines were followed to include peer-reviewed papers that describe methods to quantify suppression in patients with amblyopia.

Results: From 75 included papers, results show that suppression quantification is feasible in children as young as 3-years old. Only three randomized clinical trials have used suppression as a quantified outcome measure. Methodologies are broadly categorized by target size, electrophysiology, or contrast. Common clinical tools are primarily size-based (e.g. the worth four-dot test at varying distances) or contrast-based (e.g. neutral density filters). Conversely, most experimental assessments are software-driven contrast-based paradigms such as dichoptic motion coherence tests.

Conclusion: Clinical implementation of suppression quantification remains limited. However, available clinical tools for quantifying suppression on a fine-graded continuous scale are minimal. Such finer tools for the quantification of suppression are used in lab-based research and are yet to be made commercially available. Future studies should focus on developing better clinical tools for quantifying suppression.

量化弱视抑制的方法:范围综述。
目的:抑制是皮层对单眼视觉信息的抑制。这一范围审查确定和整理不同的方法,技术和工具,用于测量和量化抑制在弱视的临床管理。方法:遵循PRISMAScR(系统评价和荟萃分析-范围评价的首选报告项目)指南纳入同行评议的论文,这些论文描述了量化弱视患者抑制的方法。结果:从纳入的75篇论文中,结果表明抑制量化在3岁儿童中是可行的。只有三个随机临床试验使用抑制作为量化的结果测量。方法大致按目标大小、电生理或对比进行分类。常见的临床工具主要是基于尺寸的(例如在不同距离下的价值四点测试)或基于对比度的(例如中性密度过滤器)。相反,大多数实验评估是软件驱动的基于对比的范例,如二分运动一致性测试。结论:抑制定量的临床应用仍然有限。然而,在精细分级的连续尺度上量化抑制的可用临床工具很少。这种用于抑制量化的更精细的工具用于基于实验室的研究,尚未商业化。未来的研究应侧重于开发更好的临床工具来量化抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书