Overwhelmed by expectations? Exploring the curvilinear effects of leaders’ creativity expectations?

IF 9.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Haoding Wang, Haixiao Chen, Ji Tao, Youping Zhu, Lifang Gao
{"title":"Overwhelmed by expectations? Exploring the curvilinear effects of leaders’ creativity expectations?","authors":"Haoding Wang,&nbsp;Haixiao Chen,&nbsp;Ji Tao,&nbsp;Youping Zhu,&nbsp;Lifang Gao","doi":"10.1007/s10490-025-10037-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While mainstream research suggests that leaders’ creativity expectations can motivate employees’ creativity, some studies indicate that overly high expectations may induce substantial stress, with counterproductive effects. This observation suggests that the association between leaders’ expectations and employees’ creativity may not be simply positive and linear. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, this study explores the nuanced relationship between leaders’ creativity expectations and employees’ creativity; we propose that this relationship exhibits an inverted U-shaped pattern and is mediated by employees’ emotional exhaustion. We argue that moderate expectations can energize employees and alleviate emotional exhaustion, fostering creativity. However, when expectations surpass a certain threshold, they create excessive stress, which increases employees’ emotional exhaustion and stifles creativity. We further posit that leaders’ objectification amplifies the curvature of this inverted U-shaped relationship. Utilizing data from a multi-wave, multi-source field study and a scenario-based experiment, we validate our model and offer valuable insights into the dynamic interplay between expectations and creativity. These results offer both theoretical contributions and practical implications for managing creativity in the workplace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8474,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","volume":"43 1","pages":"207 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-025-10037-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While mainstream research suggests that leaders’ creativity expectations can motivate employees’ creativity, some studies indicate that overly high expectations may induce substantial stress, with counterproductive effects. This observation suggests that the association between leaders’ expectations and employees’ creativity may not be simply positive and linear. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, this study explores the nuanced relationship between leaders’ creativity expectations and employees’ creativity; we propose that this relationship exhibits an inverted U-shaped pattern and is mediated by employees’ emotional exhaustion. We argue that moderate expectations can energize employees and alleviate emotional exhaustion, fostering creativity. However, when expectations surpass a certain threshold, they create excessive stress, which increases employees’ emotional exhaustion and stifles creativity. We further posit that leaders’ objectification amplifies the curvature of this inverted U-shaped relationship. Utilizing data from a multi-wave, multi-source field study and a scenario-based experiment, we validate our model and offer valuable insights into the dynamic interplay between expectations and creativity. These results offer both theoretical contributions and practical implications for managing creativity in the workplace.

Abstract Image

被期望压垮了?探索领导者创造力预期的曲线效应?
虽然主流研究表明,领导者的创造力期望可以激发员工的创造力,但一些研究表明,过高的期望可能会导致巨大的压力,产生适得其反的效果。这一观察结果表明,领导者的期望和员工的创造力之间的联系可能不是简单的正线性关系。利用资源守恒理论,本研究探讨了领导者创造力期望与员工创造力之间的微妙关系;我们认为这种关系呈现倒u型模式,并受员工情绪耗竭的中介作用。我们认为,适度的期望可以激励员工,缓解情绪疲惫,培养创造力。然而,当期望超过一定的阈值时,就会产生过度的压力,从而增加员工的情绪疲惫,扼杀创造力。我们进一步假设,领导者的客观化放大了这种倒u型关系的曲率。利用来自多波、多源现场研究和基于场景的实验的数据,我们验证了我们的模型,并为期望和创造力之间的动态相互作用提供了有价值的见解。这些结果为管理工作场所的创造力提供了理论贡献和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Management publishes original manuscripts on management and organizational research in the Asia Pacific region, encompassing Pacific Rim countries and mainland Asia. APJM focuses on the extent to which each manuscript addresses matters that pertain to the most fundamental question: “What determines organization success?” The major academic disciplines that we cover include entrepreneurship, human resource management, international business, organizational behavior, and strategic management. However, manuscripts that belong to other well-established disciplines such as accounting, economics, finance, marketing, and operations generally do not fall into the scope of APJM. We endeavor to be the major vehicle for exchange of ideas and research among management scholars within or interested in the broadly defined Asia Pacific region.Key features include: Rigor - maintained through strict review processes, high quality global reviewers, and Editorial Advisory and Review Boards comprising prominent researchers from many countries. Relevance - maintained by its focus on key management and organizational trends in the region. Uniqueness - being the first and most prominent management journal published in and about the fastest growing region in the world. Official affiliation - Asia Academy of ManagementFor more information, visit the AAOM website:www.baf.cuhk.edu.hk/asia-aom/ Officially cited as: Asia Pac J Manag
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书