Mothers' and Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Remote Provision of One-to-One Synchronous Breastfeeding Support: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
IF 0.9 4区 医学Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rachmawati Widyaningrum, Kusmayra Ambarwati, Titik Kuntari, Tyas Aisyah Putri, Puspita Dewi Kusumaninrum
{"title":"Mothers' and Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Remote Provision of One-to-One Synchronous Breastfeeding Support: A Qualitative Systematic Review.","authors":"Rachmawati Widyaningrum, Kusmayra Ambarwati, Titik Kuntari, Tyas Aisyah Putri, Puspita Dewi Kusumaninrum","doi":"10.1177/10105395261437273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breastfeeding has been shown to provide numerous benefits for mothers and babies in the short and long term. During the COVID-19 pandemic, breastfeeding support, which was traditionally provided offline, shifted to online platforms. Although these remote services were available before the pandemic began, online interventions emerged as an alternative and proved effective in helping mothers breastfeed during that period. We aimed to explore the existing literature on the experiences of mothers and health care professionals with remote one-to-one synchronous breastfeeding support and to identify the unmet support needs of mothers regarding this type of support. We systematically searched seven literature databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, MIDIRS, Web of Science, ASSIA, WHO Global Index, and Google Search. Articles published before 2010 and in languages other than English and Bahasa were excluded. A thematic approach was used to synthesise the data. Twenty-one studies were included in this review. Three themes generated from the synthesis: (1) mothers' acceptance of one-to-one synchronous telelactation, (2) benefit of one-to-one synchronous telelactation, and (3) challenges faced in one-to-one synchronous telelactation. In conclusion, mothers generally accepted one-to-one synchronous breastfeeding support as an alternative to in-person sessions, although some challenges remain. Further improvements are needed to address accessibility and scheduling issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":55570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"10105395261437273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395261437273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Breastfeeding has been shown to provide numerous benefits for mothers and babies in the short and long term. During the COVID-19 pandemic, breastfeeding support, which was traditionally provided offline, shifted to online platforms. Although these remote services were available before the pandemic began, online interventions emerged as an alternative and proved effective in helping mothers breastfeed during that period. We aimed to explore the existing literature on the experiences of mothers and health care professionals with remote one-to-one synchronous breastfeeding support and to identify the unmet support needs of mothers regarding this type of support. We systematically searched seven literature databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, MIDIRS, Web of Science, ASSIA, WHO Global Index, and Google Search. Articles published before 2010 and in languages other than English and Bahasa were excluded. A thematic approach was used to synthesise the data. Twenty-one studies were included in this review. Three themes generated from the synthesis: (1) mothers' acceptance of one-to-one synchronous telelactation, (2) benefit of one-to-one synchronous telelactation, and (3) challenges faced in one-to-one synchronous telelactation. In conclusion, mothers generally accepted one-to-one synchronous breastfeeding support as an alternative to in-person sessions, although some challenges remain. Further improvements are needed to address accessibility and scheduling issues.
母乳喂养已被证明在短期和长期内为母亲和婴儿提供了许多好处。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,传统上在线下提供的母乳喂养支持转向了在线平台。尽管在大流行开始之前就有这些远程服务,但在线干预措施作为一种替代方案出现,并证明在此期间帮助母亲母乳喂养是有效的。我们的目的是探索关于母亲和卫生保健专业人员接受远程一对一同步母乳喂养支持的经验的现有文献,并确定母亲在这类支持方面未得到满足的支持需求。我们系统地检索了7个文献数据库:MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus、MIDIRS、Web of Science、ASSIA、WHO Global Index和谷歌Search。2010年以前发表的文章以及英语和印尼语以外的语言被排除在外。采用专题方法来综合数据。本综述纳入了21项研究。综合产生了三个主题:(1)母亲对一对一同步远程哺乳的接受程度;(2)一对一同步远程哺乳的好处;(3)一对一同步远程哺乳面临的挑战。总之,母亲们普遍接受一对一的同步母乳喂养支持,作为面对面会议的替代方案,尽管仍存在一些挑战。需要进一步的改进来解决可访问性和调度问题。
期刊介绍:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health (APJPH) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that focuses on health issues in the Asia-Pacific Region. APJPH publishes original articles on public health related issues, including implications for practical applications to professional education and services for public health and primary health care that are of concern and relevance to the Asia-Pacific region.