An Innovative Model of Delivering Resident Didactics in Two Family Medicine Residency Programs.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Family Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2026.722512
Laura Haagenson DiPaolo, Jennifer Moranda, Amanda Mooneyham, Elizabeth Evangelista, Patricia A Carney
{"title":"An Innovative Model of Delivering Resident Didactics in Two Family Medicine Residency Programs.","authors":"Laura Haagenson DiPaolo, Jennifer Moranda, Amanda Mooneyham, Elizabeth Evangelista, Patricia A Carney","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2026.722512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Didactic training in residency is crucial for competency development. While traditional noon conferences (NCs) are common, challenges exist. The academic half-day (AHD) model has emerged as a promising alternative, showing improved resident engagement and learning outcomes. A hybrid model that blends NCs with AHDs may improve resident learning while minimizing productivity and administrative challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 6-month project was implemented and evaluated during the 2023-2024 academic year. The project comprised 3 weeks of traditional NC didactics and 1 week of AHD each month. We assessed didactic quality, resident satisfaction, and attendance, including data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surveys. Statistical analyses included paired-samples t tests. All tests were two-sided with α set at 0.05. We also analyzed effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resident attendance increased from 60.07%-65.96% overall, with AHD attendance reaching 97.5%. Survey responses indicated significant improvements in engagement (mean 2.46 to 4.46; P&lt;0.001), in-depth learning (mean 2.39 to 4.46; P&lt;0.001), work-life balance (mean 1.77 to 4.23; P&lt;0.001), and wellness (mean 1.92 to 4.39; P&lt;0.001). Preferences varied, with 60% of residents favoring weekly AHDs. ACGME surveys showed that compliance for educational balance and protected time increased from 67%-76% and 47%-71%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transitioning to a hybrid AHD model was associated with improved resident engagement, satisfaction, attendance, and educational value compared to the traditional NC model. Continued evaluation is recommended to optimize educational outcomes and resource utilization, while minimizing challenges to productivity and administrative details.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":"58 3","pages":"215-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2026.722512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Didactic training in residency is crucial for competency development. While traditional noon conferences (NCs) are common, challenges exist. The academic half-day (AHD) model has emerged as a promising alternative, showing improved resident engagement and learning outcomes. A hybrid model that blends NCs with AHDs may improve resident learning while minimizing productivity and administrative challenges.

Methods: A 6-month project was implemented and evaluated during the 2023-2024 academic year. The project comprised 3 weeks of traditional NC didactics and 1 week of AHD each month. We assessed didactic quality, resident satisfaction, and attendance, including data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surveys. Statistical analyses included paired-samples t tests. All tests were two-sided with α set at 0.05. We also analyzed effect sizes.

Results: Resident attendance increased from 60.07%-65.96% overall, with AHD attendance reaching 97.5%. Survey responses indicated significant improvements in engagement (mean 2.46 to 4.46; P<0.001), in-depth learning (mean 2.39 to 4.46; P<0.001), work-life balance (mean 1.77 to 4.23; P<0.001), and wellness (mean 1.92 to 4.39; P<0.001). Preferences varied, with 60% of residents favoring weekly AHDs. ACGME surveys showed that compliance for educational balance and protected time increased from 67%-76% and 47%-71%, respectively.

Conclusions: Transitioning to a hybrid AHD model was associated with improved resident engagement, satisfaction, attendance, and educational value compared to the traditional NC model. Continued evaluation is recommended to optimize educational outcomes and resource utilization, while minimizing challenges to productivity and administrative details.

在两个家庭医学住院医师项目中提供住院医师教学的创新模式。
背景和目标:住院医师的教学培训对能力发展至关重要。虽然传统的午间会议(NCs)很常见,但挑战也存在。学术半天(AHD)模式已经成为一种有前途的替代方案,显示出更好的住院医生参与和学习成果。一种混合模式,混合了NCs和ahd可以提高住院医师的学习,同时最大限度地减少生产力和管理挑战。方法:在2023-2024学年实施为期6个月的项目并进行评估。该项目包括每月三周的传统NC教学和一周的AHD教学。我们评估了教学质量、住院医师满意度和出勤率,包括来自研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)调查的数据。统计分析包括配对样本t检验。所有检验均为双侧检验,α设为0.05。我们还分析了效应量。结果:住院医生出勤率从60.07%提高到65.96%,AHD出勤率达到97.5%。调查结果表明,在敬业度(平均值2.46至4.46;P<0.001)、深度学习(平均值2.39至4.46;P<0.001)、工作与生活平衡(平均值1.77至4.23;P<0.001)和健康(平均值1.92至4.39;P<0.001)方面有了显著改善。偏好各不相同,60%的居民倾向于每周AHDs。ACGME调查显示,遵守教育平衡和保护时间的比例分别从67%-76%和47%-71%增加。结论:与传统NC模型相比,过渡到混合型AHD模型与住院医师参与度、满意度、出勤率和教育价值的提高有关。建议进行持续评估,以优化教育成果和资源利用,同时最大限度地减少对生产力和行政细节的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书