High-Frequency Ultrasonography for Ex Vivo Periodontal Tissue Measurement: Accuracy and Reproducibility Compared to Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Laurent Estrade, Baptiste Ait Slimane, Alexis Delpierre, Victor Rimbaud, Frédéric Denis, Gaël Y Rochefort, Matthieu Renaud
{"title":"High-Frequency Ultrasonography for Ex Vivo Periodontal Tissue Measurement: Accuracy and Reproducibility Compared to Cone Beam Computed Tomography.","authors":"Laurent Estrade, Baptiste Ait Slimane, Alexis Delpierre, Victor Rimbaud, Frédéric Denis, Gaël Y Rochefort, Matthieu Renaud","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of periodontal tissue measurements obtained through ultrasonographic imaging, by comparing them ex vivo to reference measurements acquired via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 12 hemi-jaws were included in the study. CBCT acquisition was realised, and then ultrasound measurements of periodontal structures were performed. Ultrasound imaging was performed with a linear array 20 MHz probe (field of view 14.1 × 6.4 mm; penetration depth ≈ 4.9 mm; axial/lateral resolution 80/120 µm). The ultrasound images were analysed using ImageJ software. Reference points were made allowing the measurement of the different tissues. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Lin's concordance test were performed for each of the samples due to the size of their population (>50).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 348 manual probing measurements were performed. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients were: gingival thickness: 0.479 (95% CI [0.393-0.558]); distance from the alveolar crest to the CEJ: 0.872 (95% CI [0.842-0.897]); distance from the alveolar crest to the gingival margin: 0.794 (95% CI [0.749-0.832]); alveolar bone thickness: -0.0165 (95% CI [-0.0512 to 0.0183]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-frequency ultrasonography demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility for measuring periodontal structures ex vivo, particularly for the distance from the alveolar crest to the CEJ, but further clinical studies are needed to validate its use in vivo.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This non-ionising technique offers a safe alternative to CBCT for periodontal assessment, with potential to enhance early diagnosis and monitoring in clinical practice while minimising radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.02.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of periodontal tissue measurements obtained through ultrasonographic imaging, by comparing them ex vivo to reference measurements acquired via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: A total of 12 hemi-jaws were included in the study. CBCT acquisition was realised, and then ultrasound measurements of periodontal structures were performed. Ultrasound imaging was performed with a linear array 20 MHz probe (field of view 14.1 × 6.4 mm; penetration depth ≈ 4.9 mm; axial/lateral resolution 80/120 µm). The ultrasound images were analysed using ImageJ software. Reference points were made allowing the measurement of the different tissues. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Lin's concordance test were performed for each of the samples due to the size of their population (>50).

Results: A total of 348 manual probing measurements were performed. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients were: gingival thickness: 0.479 (95% CI [0.393-0.558]); distance from the alveolar crest to the CEJ: 0.872 (95% CI [0.842-0.897]); distance from the alveolar crest to the gingival margin: 0.794 (95% CI [0.749-0.832]); alveolar bone thickness: -0.0165 (95% CI [-0.0512 to 0.0183]).

Conclusion: High-frequency ultrasonography demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility for measuring periodontal structures ex vivo, particularly for the distance from the alveolar crest to the CEJ, but further clinical studies are needed to validate its use in vivo.

Clinical relevance: This non-ionising technique offers a safe alternative to CBCT for periodontal assessment, with potential to enhance early diagnosis and monitoring in clinical practice while minimising radiation exposure.

高频超声在离体牙周组织测量中的应用:与锥束计算机断层扫描相比的准确性和可重复性。
目的:本研究的目的是通过将超声成像获得的牙周组织测量结果与锥体束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)获得的参考测量结果进行比较,以评估超声成像获得的牙周组织测量结果的准确性和可重复性。方法:选取12个半颌进行研究。实现CBCT采集,然后进行牙周结构超声测量。超声成像采用线性阵列20mhz探头(视场14.1 × 6.4 mm,穿透深度≈4.9 mm,轴向/横向分辨率80/120µm)。采用ImageJ软件对超声图像进行分析。参考点是允许测量不同的组织。由于每个样本的总体大小,对每个样本进行Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验和Lin的一致性检验(bbb50)。结果:共进行了348次人工探查测量。林氏一致性相关系数为:牙龈厚度:0.479 (95% CI [0.393-0.558]);牙槽嵴到CEJ的距离:0.872 (95% CI [0.842-0.897]);牙槽嵴到龈缘的距离:0.794 (95% CI [0.749-0.832]);牙槽骨厚度:-0.0165 (95% CI[-0.0512 ~ 0.0183])。结论:高频超声在离体测量牙周结构具有较高的准确性和重复性,特别是对牙槽嵴到CEJ的距离,但需要进一步的临床研究来验证其在体内的应用。临床意义:这种非电离技术为牙周评估提供了一种安全的替代CBCT,在临床实践中具有增强早期诊断和监测的潜力,同时最大限度地减少辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书