Hallucination Proneness is Linked to Over-Reliance on Internal Priors for Noisy Speech.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Izabele Batkovskyte, Naresh Subramaniam, Johanna Finnemann, Matthew H Davis, Paul C Fletcher
{"title":"Hallucination Proneness is Linked to Over-Reliance on Internal Priors for Noisy Speech.","authors":"Izabele Batkovskyte, Naresh Subramaniam, Johanna Finnemann, Matthew H Davis, Paul C Fletcher","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbag048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to predictive processing models, hallucinations can arise from over-weighting of prior expectations relative to sensory input. Individuals who hallucinate may misattribute internally-generated experiences to external sources. Combining these mechanisms, we hypothesized that hallucination-proneness in a non-clinical sample is associated with a greater reliance on internally-generated priors compared to externally-provided priors during degraded speech perception.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Two online experiments were conducted with healthy adult participants. Experiment 1 (n = 92) targeted lower-level perceptual processes by assessing sensitivity and bias in distinguishing regular vocoded speech from unintelligible, spectrally-rotated vocoded stimuli at varying levels of sensory clarity. Experiment 2 (n = 100) compared the influence of internally-generated versus externally-provided priors on perception of vocoded speech content. Internal- and external-priors were matched in reliability to test if hallucination-proneness was linked to differential influences of internally-generated priors on speech perception.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Experiment 1 confirmed that participants who are more hallucination-prone showed a reduced ability to distinguish potentially intelligible speech from unintelligible speech, and a higher bias toward indicating that speech was present in unintelligible stimuli. Experiment 2 confirmed differential effects of internal priors, showing that hallucination-proneness scores were linked to a greater influence on internally-generated priors on perceptual report when these were incorrect, and a lower reliance on externally-provided priors when these were correct.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that hallucination-proneness is linked to an increased influence of internally-generated compared to externally-provided predictions on perception, suggesting an additional element of predictive processing theories of hallucinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"52 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbag048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to predictive processing models, hallucinations can arise from over-weighting of prior expectations relative to sensory input. Individuals who hallucinate may misattribute internally-generated experiences to external sources. Combining these mechanisms, we hypothesized that hallucination-proneness in a non-clinical sample is associated with a greater reliance on internally-generated priors compared to externally-provided priors during degraded speech perception.

Study design: Two online experiments were conducted with healthy adult participants. Experiment 1 (n = 92) targeted lower-level perceptual processes by assessing sensitivity and bias in distinguishing regular vocoded speech from unintelligible, spectrally-rotated vocoded stimuli at varying levels of sensory clarity. Experiment 2 (n = 100) compared the influence of internally-generated versus externally-provided priors on perception of vocoded speech content. Internal- and external-priors were matched in reliability to test if hallucination-proneness was linked to differential influences of internally-generated priors on speech perception.

Study results: Experiment 1 confirmed that participants who are more hallucination-prone showed a reduced ability to distinguish potentially intelligible speech from unintelligible speech, and a higher bias toward indicating that speech was present in unintelligible stimuli. Experiment 2 confirmed differential effects of internal priors, showing that hallucination-proneness scores were linked to a greater influence on internally-generated priors on perceptual report when these were incorrect, and a lower reliance on externally-provided priors when these were correct.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that hallucination-proneness is linked to an increased influence of internally-generated compared to externally-provided predictions on perception, suggesting an additional element of predictive processing theories of hallucinations.

幻觉倾向与过度依赖嘈杂言语的内部先验有关。
背景:根据预测加工模型,幻觉可以产生于相对于感官输入的先验期望的过度加权。产生幻觉的人可能会错误地将内部产生的体验归因于外部来源。结合这些机制,我们假设非临床样本中的幻觉倾向与言语感知退化过程中对内部产生的先验的依赖程度高于外部提供的先验。研究设计:对健康成人参与者进行了两个在线实验。实验1 (n = 92)通过评估在不同感觉清晰度水平下区分常规语音编码与难以理解的、频谱旋转的语音编码刺激的敏感性和偏差,以低水平感知过程为目标。实验2 (n = 100)比较了内部生成和外部提供的先验对语音编码语音内容感知的影响。内部和外部先验在可靠性上匹配,以测试幻觉倾向是否与内部产生的先验对语言感知的不同影响有关。研究结果:实验1证实,更容易产生幻觉的参与者表现出区分潜在可理解言语和不可理解言语的能力下降,并且更倾向于表明言语存在于不可理解的刺激中。实验2证实了内部先验的差异效应,表明当内部先验不正确时,幻觉倾向分数对感知报告的内部先验的影响更大,而当外部先验正确时,对外部先验的依赖更低。结论:这些发现表明,与外部提供的预测相比,幻觉倾向与内部产生的预测对感知的影响更大有关,这表明幻觉的预测加工理论有一个额外的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书