Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Patients With Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study.
Andrew T Goldstein, Zhihong Lai, Rong Rong, Haq Nawaz, Melissa M Mauskar
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Patients With Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study.","authors":"Andrew T Goldstein, Zhihong Lai, Rong Rong, Haq Nawaz, Melissa M Mauskar","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2026.04.1993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective nonsteroidal treatment options for patients with lichen sclerosus (LS) are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in adult women with anogenital LS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 2 study (NCT05593445) enrolled women with LS affecting ≤10% of their body surface area, Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥2, and baseline Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4. Patients were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily application of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for 12 weeks, after which all patients applied ruxolitinib cream (once or twice daily) through Week 24. The primary endpoint was ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Itch NRS (Itch NRS4) at Week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients were randomized. At Week 12, similar proportions of patients in the ruxolitinib cream and vehicle groups achieved Itch NRS4 (35.7% vs 40.0%, P=0.737). The ruxolitinib cream group had greater reductions in total Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score versus vehicle (-5.79 vs -3.03; P=0.019). Application site reactions were infrequent (n=4; grade 1/2), and no serious adverse events were reported with ruxolitinib cream.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Treatment duration was relatively short.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ruxolitinib cream significantly improved clinical signs of LS, but not itch, versus vehicle and was generally well tolerated in women with LS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2026.04.1993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Effective nonsteroidal treatment options for patients with lichen sclerosus (LS) are limited.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in adult women with anogenital LS.
Methods: This phase 2 study (NCT05593445) enrolled women with LS affecting ≤10% of their body surface area, Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥2, and baseline Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4. Patients were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily application of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for 12 weeks, after which all patients applied ruxolitinib cream (once or twice daily) through Week 24. The primary endpoint was ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Itch NRS (Itch NRS4) at Week 12.
Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized. At Week 12, similar proportions of patients in the ruxolitinib cream and vehicle groups achieved Itch NRS4 (35.7% vs 40.0%, P=0.737). The ruxolitinib cream group had greater reductions in total Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score versus vehicle (-5.79 vs -3.03; P=0.019). Application site reactions were infrequent (n=4; grade 1/2), and no serious adverse events were reported with ruxolitinib cream.
Limitations: Treatment duration was relatively short.
Conclusion: Ruxolitinib cream significantly improved clinical signs of LS, but not itch, versus vehicle and was generally well tolerated in women with LS.
背景:硬化地衣(LS)患者有效的非甾体治疗选择有限。目的:评价1.5%鲁索利替尼乳膏治疗成年女性肛门生殖器肌萎缩症的疗效和安全性。方法:这项2期研究(NCT05593445)招募了LS影响≤10%体表面积的女性,研究者的整体评估评分≥2,基线瘙痒数值评定量表(NRS)≥4。患者随机分为1:1至每日两次使用1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏或对照剂12周,之后所有患者均使用ruxolitinib乳膏(每日1次或2次)至第24周。主要终点是第12周瘙痒NRS(瘙痒NRS4)较基线改善≥4点。结果:61例患者被随机化。在第12周,ruxolitinib乳膏组和载体组中达到瘙痒NRS4的患者比例相似(35.7% vs 40.0%, P=0.737)。鲁索利替尼乳膏组与对照剂组相比,临床硬化地衣总分有更大的降低(-5.79 vs -3.03; P=0.019)。应用部位反应罕见(n=4, 1/2级),鲁索利替尼乳膏无严重不良事件报道。局限性:治疗时间较短。结论:Ruxolitinib乳膏可以显著改善LS的临床症状,但对瘙痒没有改善,并且对LS患者的耐受性良好。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.