Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Patients With Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study.

IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Andrew T Goldstein, Zhihong Lai, Rong Rong, Haq Nawaz, Melissa M Mauskar
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Patients With Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study.","authors":"Andrew T Goldstein, Zhihong Lai, Rong Rong, Haq Nawaz, Melissa M Mauskar","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2026.04.1993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective nonsteroidal treatment options for patients with lichen sclerosus (LS) are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in adult women with anogenital LS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 2 study (NCT05593445) enrolled women with LS affecting ≤10% of their body surface area, Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥2, and baseline Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4. Patients were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily application of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for 12 weeks, after which all patients applied ruxolitinib cream (once or twice daily) through Week 24. The primary endpoint was ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Itch NRS (Itch NRS4) at Week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients were randomized. At Week 12, similar proportions of patients in the ruxolitinib cream and vehicle groups achieved Itch NRS4 (35.7% vs 40.0%, P=0.737). The ruxolitinib cream group had greater reductions in total Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score versus vehicle (-5.79 vs -3.03; P=0.019). Application site reactions were infrequent (n=4; grade 1/2), and no serious adverse events were reported with ruxolitinib cream.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Treatment duration was relatively short.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ruxolitinib cream significantly improved clinical signs of LS, but not itch, versus vehicle and was generally well tolerated in women with LS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2026.04.1993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective nonsteroidal treatment options for patients with lichen sclerosus (LS) are limited.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in adult women with anogenital LS.

Methods: This phase 2 study (NCT05593445) enrolled women with LS affecting ≤10% of their body surface area, Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥2, and baseline Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4. Patients were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily application of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for 12 weeks, after which all patients applied ruxolitinib cream (once or twice daily) through Week 24. The primary endpoint was ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Itch NRS (Itch NRS4) at Week 12.

Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized. At Week 12, similar proportions of patients in the ruxolitinib cream and vehicle groups achieved Itch NRS4 (35.7% vs 40.0%, P=0.737). The ruxolitinib cream group had greater reductions in total Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score versus vehicle (-5.79 vs -3.03; P=0.019). Application site reactions were infrequent (n=4; grade 1/2), and no serious adverse events were reported with ruxolitinib cream.

Limitations: Treatment duration was relatively short.

Conclusion: Ruxolitinib cream significantly improved clinical signs of LS, but not itch, versus vehicle and was generally well tolerated in women with LS.

Ruxolitinib乳膏对硬化地衣患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、载体对照的2期研究结果
背景:硬化地衣(LS)患者有效的非甾体治疗选择有限。目的:评价1.5%鲁索利替尼乳膏治疗成年女性肛门生殖器肌萎缩症的疗效和安全性。方法:这项2期研究(NCT05593445)招募了LS影响≤10%体表面积的女性,研究者的整体评估评分≥2,基线瘙痒数值评定量表(NRS)≥4。患者随机分为1:1至每日两次使用1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏或对照剂12周,之后所有患者均使用ruxolitinib乳膏(每日1次或2次)至第24周。主要终点是第12周瘙痒NRS(瘙痒NRS4)较基线改善≥4点。结果:61例患者被随机化。在第12周,ruxolitinib乳膏组和载体组中达到瘙痒NRS4的患者比例相似(35.7% vs 40.0%, P=0.737)。鲁索利替尼乳膏组与对照剂组相比,临床硬化地衣总分有更大的降低(-5.79 vs -3.03; P=0.019)。应用部位反应罕见(n=4, 1/2级),鲁索利替尼乳膏无严重不良事件报道。局限性:治疗时间较短。结论:Ruxolitinib乳膏可以显著改善LS的临床症状,但对瘙痒没有改善,并且对LS患者的耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
2023
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书