Development and optimization of an LED-based particle image velocimetry methodology for dynamic powder flowability in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sang Min Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Du Hyung Choi
{"title":"Development and optimization of an LED-based particle image velocimetry methodology for dynamic powder flowability in pharmaceutical manufacturing.","authors":"Sang Min Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Du Hyung Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2026.107543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional static flowability tests lack the sensitivity to capture process-relevant powder dynamics. This study developed and optimized an LED-based particle image velocimetry (PIV) system for real-time, non-invasive characterization of powder dynamic flowability during blending. Three PIV parameters, illumination intensity, CLAHE window size, and interrogation window size, were systematically optimized; optimal conditions (65,125 lx; 16 px CLAHE; 32 px) yielded reproducible velocity vector fields. The system was applied to six excipients: three MCC grades (Avicel® PH-102, PH-112, PROSOLV® SMCC 50) and three lactose-based powders (Cellactose® 80, Tablettose® 80, MicroceLac® 100), with complementary FT4 powder rheometer measurements. Multi-parametric analysis encompassing velocity magnitude, vorticity, shear strain rate, stretching deformation rate, and correlation coefficient across spatially defined regions of interest revealed powder-specific flow dynamics. Among MCC grades, PROSOLV® SMCC 50 showed the highest velocity (0.99 px/frame), while Avicel® PH-102 and PH-112 were comparable (0.32 px/frame each) yet differed 6-9-fold in blade-region vorticity and shear strain rate, representing mechanistic differences not discernible by static Carr's index. Among lactose-based powders sharing similar static classifications, PIV revealed distinct velocity profiles: MicroceLac® 100 (0.78), Cellactose® 80 (0.71), and Tablettose® 80 (0.51 px/frame). FT4 cohesion and unconfined yield strength inversely correlated with PIV velocity (r = -0.97), corroborating the PIV-derived flowability rankings, whereas basic flowability energy did not predict blending performance, confirming that confined-condition metrics do not capture process-relevant dynamics. These results establish LED-based PIV as a practical, multi-dimensional flowability characterization tool, complementary to powder rheometry, with direct relevance to excipient selection and process design in pharmaceutical manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"107543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2026.107543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional static flowability tests lack the sensitivity to capture process-relevant powder dynamics. This study developed and optimized an LED-based particle image velocimetry (PIV) system for real-time, non-invasive characterization of powder dynamic flowability during blending. Three PIV parameters, illumination intensity, CLAHE window size, and interrogation window size, were systematically optimized; optimal conditions (65,125 lx; 16 px CLAHE; 32 px) yielded reproducible velocity vector fields. The system was applied to six excipients: three MCC grades (Avicel® PH-102, PH-112, PROSOLV® SMCC 50) and three lactose-based powders (Cellactose® 80, Tablettose® 80, MicroceLac® 100), with complementary FT4 powder rheometer measurements. Multi-parametric analysis encompassing velocity magnitude, vorticity, shear strain rate, stretching deformation rate, and correlation coefficient across spatially defined regions of interest revealed powder-specific flow dynamics. Among MCC grades, PROSOLV® SMCC 50 showed the highest velocity (0.99 px/frame), while Avicel® PH-102 and PH-112 were comparable (0.32 px/frame each) yet differed 6-9-fold in blade-region vorticity and shear strain rate, representing mechanistic differences not discernible by static Carr's index. Among lactose-based powders sharing similar static classifications, PIV revealed distinct velocity profiles: MicroceLac® 100 (0.78), Cellactose® 80 (0.71), and Tablettose® 80 (0.51 px/frame). FT4 cohesion and unconfined yield strength inversely correlated with PIV velocity (r = -0.97), corroborating the PIV-derived flowability rankings, whereas basic flowability energy did not predict blending performance, confirming that confined-condition metrics do not capture process-relevant dynamics. These results establish LED-based PIV as a practical, multi-dimensional flowability characterization tool, complementary to powder rheometry, with direct relevance to excipient selection and process design in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

基于led的粉末动态流动速度测量方法的开发与优化。
传统的静态流动性测试缺乏捕捉与工艺相关的粉末动力学的灵敏度。本研究开发并优化了一种基于led的颗粒图像测速(PIV)系统,用于实时、无创地表征粉末混合过程中的动态流动性。对光照强度、CLAHE窗大小、询问窗大小三个PIV参数进行了系统优化;最佳条件(65,125 lx; 16 px CLAHE; 32 px)产生可重复的速度矢量场。该系统应用于六种辅料:三种MCC等级(Avicel®PH-102, PH-112, PROSOLV®SMCC 50)和三种基于乳糖的粉末(Cellactose® 80,Tablettose® 80,MicroceLac® 100),并补充FT4粉末流变仪测量。多参数分析包括速度大小,涡度,剪切应变率,拉伸变形率和相关系数跨越空间定义的感兴趣区域揭示了粉末特定的流动动力学。在MCC等级中,PROSOLV®SMCC 50显示出最高的速度(0.99 px/帧),而Avicel®PH-102和PH-112具有可比性(各0.32 px/帧),但在叶片区域涡度和剪切应变率方面存在6-9倍的差异,这代表了静态卡尔指数无法识别的机制差异。在具有相似静态分类的乳糖基粉末中,PIV显示出不同的速度分布:MicroceLac® 100 (0.78),Cellactose® 80(0.71)和Tablettose® 80(0.51 px/frame)。FT4黏聚力和无侧限屈服强度与PIV速度呈负相关(r = -0.97),证实了PIV导出的流动性排名,而基本流动性能量并不能预测混合性能,证实了受限条件指标不能捕捉与过程相关的动力学。这些结果表明,基于led的PIV是一种实用的、多维流动性表征工具,是粉末流变学的补充,与制药制造中的赋形剂选择和工艺设计直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
248
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development. More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making. Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书