A reach-scale bioassessment index for highly disturbed large rivers based on Species-Area (length) models.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiaodie Jiang, Junyan Wu, Yajing He, Wenjuan Gao, Mengjie Kang, Yongjing Zhao, Yongde Cui, Hongzhu Wang
{"title":"A reach-scale bioassessment index for highly disturbed large rivers based on Species-Area (length) models.","authors":"Xiaodie Jiang, Junyan Wu, Yajing He, Wenjuan Gao, Mengjie Kang, Yongjing Zhao, Yongde Cui, Hongzhu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological health assessment in large rivers remains challenging due to their tremendous natural environmental heterogeneity, the difficulty of obtaining representative samples, and the absence of near-natural reference conditions. Using the Yangtze River as a case study, we develop a reach-scale biological index (O/E<sub>SL</sub>) for large rivers using fish and macroinvertebrate data. The index is developed in three steps. First, we classify reaches of the Yangtze River mainstem and tributaries using long-term stable spatial and geomorphic factors to control natural variability. Second, we expand the assessment scale from sites to reaches to enhance the spatial representativeness and robustness of the assessment results. Third, drawing on the species-area (length) relationship, we construct observed species (S<sub>O</sub>)-length (L) quantile regression models for each reach type to objectively define reference conditions, estimate expected species richness (S<sub>E</sub>), and calculate the O/E<sub>SL</sub> index as the ratio of S<sub>O</sub> to S<sub>E</sub>. The O/E<sub>SL</sub> index demonstrates robust sensitivity to hydromorphological alterations and reveals a concerning ecological status in the Yangtze River-only 13% of the 93 evaluated reaches are classified as healthy. Finally, we propose a basic methodological framework for ecological health assessment in highly disturbed large rivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"407 ","pages":"129894"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological health assessment in large rivers remains challenging due to their tremendous natural environmental heterogeneity, the difficulty of obtaining representative samples, and the absence of near-natural reference conditions. Using the Yangtze River as a case study, we develop a reach-scale biological index (O/ESL) for large rivers using fish and macroinvertebrate data. The index is developed in three steps. First, we classify reaches of the Yangtze River mainstem and tributaries using long-term stable spatial and geomorphic factors to control natural variability. Second, we expand the assessment scale from sites to reaches to enhance the spatial representativeness and robustness of the assessment results. Third, drawing on the species-area (length) relationship, we construct observed species (SO)-length (L) quantile regression models for each reach type to objectively define reference conditions, estimate expected species richness (SE), and calculate the O/ESL index as the ratio of SO to SE. The O/ESL index demonstrates robust sensitivity to hydromorphological alterations and reveals a concerning ecological status in the Yangtze River-only 13% of the 93 evaluated reaches are classified as healthy. Finally, we propose a basic methodological framework for ecological health assessment in highly disturbed large rivers.

基于物种-面积(长度)模型的大扰动河流河段生物评价指标
由于自然环境的巨大异质性,难以获得具有代表性的样本,以及缺乏接近自然的参考条件,大河的生态健康评估仍然具有挑战性。以长江为例,利用鱼类和大型无脊椎动物数据,建立了大河河段生物指数(O/ESL)。该指数分为三步制定。首先,利用长期稳定的空间地貌因子控制自然变率,对长江干支流河段进行分类。其次,将评价尺度从站点扩展到河段,增强评价结果的空间代表性和稳健性。第三,利用物种-面积(长度)关系,构建各河段类型的观测物种(SO)-长度(L)分位数回归模型,客观定义参考条件,估算预期物种丰富度(SE),并计算O/ESL指数(SO / SE)。O/ESL指数对水文形态变化具有较强的敏感性,反映了长江流域的生态状况,在93个评价河段中,只有13%的河段被列为健康河段。最后,提出了大扰动河流生态健康评价的基本方法框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书