Deep learning surrogate model to explain decision variable synergies in energy system modelling

IF 6.1 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Smart Energy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.segy.2026.100246
Matteo Giacomo Prina , Carlo Pelizzoni , Mackenzie Judson , Madeleine McPherson , Andrea Menapace , Giampaolo Manzolini , Wolfram Sparber
{"title":"Deep learning surrogate model to explain decision variable synergies in energy system modelling","authors":"Matteo Giacomo Prina ,&nbsp;Carlo Pelizzoni ,&nbsp;Mackenzie Judson ,&nbsp;Madeleine McPherson ,&nbsp;Andrea Menapace ,&nbsp;Giampaolo Manzolini ,&nbsp;Wolfram Sparber","doi":"10.1016/j.segy.2026.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy system models are powerful tools for planning the low-carbon transition. They identify optimal technology portfolios but rarely explain why certain combinations outperform others. Understanding decision variable synergies across multiple sectors remains a key gap in the literature. This study addresses that gap with a two-stage methodology applied to the Piemonte region (Italy) for 2050, using 17 decision variables and two objective functions (total annual costs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions). In the first stage, an expert-based analysis of six electrification technologies is conducted using the EPLANopt model. It reveals a fundamental behavioral dichotomy: heat pumps reduce CO<sub>2</sub> independently of grid decarbonization, while Power-to-X technologies require an effective renewable share above approximately 50% to yield a net environmental benefit. In the second stage, a deep learning surrogate model trained on thousands EnergyPLAN simulations enables systematic sensitivity and interaction analysis across all 17 variables. Explainability artificial intelligence methods identify solar capacity and synthetic gas as the dominant variables. Pairwise analysis across all 136 variable combinations reveals a dominant PV surplus–Power-to-Gas valorisation chain. Third-order analysis shows that battery storage acts as a critical mediator between PV generation and Power-to-Gas conversion, producing emergent synergies that cannot be decomposed into pairwise effects. These findings provide a physically interpretable, data-driven basis for sequencing technology deployments in regional energy planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34738,"journal":{"name":"Smart Energy","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955226000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy system models are powerful tools for planning the low-carbon transition. They identify optimal technology portfolios but rarely explain why certain combinations outperform others. Understanding decision variable synergies across multiple sectors remains a key gap in the literature. This study addresses that gap with a two-stage methodology applied to the Piemonte region (Italy) for 2050, using 17 decision variables and two objective functions (total annual costs and CO2 emissions). In the first stage, an expert-based analysis of six electrification technologies is conducted using the EPLANopt model. It reveals a fundamental behavioral dichotomy: heat pumps reduce CO2 independently of grid decarbonization, while Power-to-X technologies require an effective renewable share above approximately 50% to yield a net environmental benefit. In the second stage, a deep learning surrogate model trained on thousands EnergyPLAN simulations enables systematic sensitivity and interaction analysis across all 17 variables. Explainability artificial intelligence methods identify solar capacity and synthetic gas as the dominant variables. Pairwise analysis across all 136 variable combinations reveals a dominant PV surplus–Power-to-Gas valorisation chain. Third-order analysis shows that battery storage acts as a critical mediator between PV generation and Power-to-Gas conversion, producing emergent synergies that cannot be decomposed into pairwise effects. These findings provide a physically interpretable, data-driven basis for sequencing technology deployments in regional energy planning.

Abstract Image

用深度学习替代模型解释能源系统建模中的决策变量协同效应
能源系统模型是规划低碳转型的有力工具。他们确定了最优的技术组合,但很少解释为什么某些组合的表现优于其他组合。理解跨多个部门的决策变量协同效应仍然是文献中的一个关键空白。本研究采用两阶段方法解决了这一差距,该方法适用于2050年的皮埃蒙特地区(意大利),使用17个决策变量和两个目标函数(年度总成本和二氧化碳排放量)。在第一阶段,使用EPLANopt模型对六种电气化技术进行基于专家的分析。它揭示了一个基本的行为二分法:热泵减少二氧化碳独立于电网脱碳,而Power-to-X技术需要有效的可再生能源份额超过50%才能产生净环境效益。在第二阶段,经过数千次EnergyPLAN模拟训练的深度学习代理模型能够对所有17个变量进行系统的敏感性和相互作用分析。可解释性人工智能方法将太阳能容量和合成气识别为主导变量。对所有136个变量组合的两两分析揭示了光伏发电剩余-电力-天然气定价链的主导地位。三阶分析表明,电池储能在光伏发电和电转气转换之间起着关键的中介作用,产生了不可分解为两两效应的紧急协同效应。这些发现为区域能源规划中排序技术的部署提供了物理上可解释的数据驱动基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Energy
Smart Energy Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
73 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书