Analysis of a Standardized Approach to Healthcare Worker Hazardous Medication Surveillance: Lessons learned and future enhancements.

IF 1.4
Laura Breeher, Richard Newcomb, Kristine Hanson, Caitlin Hainy, LuAnn Fowler, Kelsey Hoyer, Alzhraa Abbas, Krista Severson, Melanie Swift
{"title":"Analysis of a Standardized Approach to Healthcare Worker Hazardous Medication Surveillance: Lessons learned and future enhancements.","authors":"Laura Breeher, Richard Newcomb, Kristine Hanson, Caitlin Hainy, LuAnn Fowler, Kelsey Hoyer, Alzhraa Abbas, Krista Severson, Melanie Swift","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized hazardous medication surveillance program and identify occupational factors associated with adverse health outcomes among healthcare workers (HCWs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 2,625 HCWs enrolled in a multi-site surveillance program (2020-2022). Participants completed a standardized questionnaire and underwent complete blood count testing. Exposure was categorized by weekly time handling hazardous medications. Associations were evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher exposure (>8 hours/week) was associated with increased symptom reporting, hazardous medication spills, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Female sex, older age, and spill exposure independently predicted symptom reporting and reproductive outcomes. No significant association was observed between exposure intensity and abnormal blood counts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Questionnaire-based surveillance effectively identified exposure-related health risks, whereas routine complete blood count testing showed limited utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized hazardous medication surveillance program and identify occupational factors associated with adverse health outcomes among healthcare workers (HCWs).

Methods: We analyzed data from 2,625 HCWs enrolled in a multi-site surveillance program (2020-2022). Participants completed a standardized questionnaire and underwent complete blood count testing. Exposure was categorized by weekly time handling hazardous medications. Associations were evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses.

Results: Higher exposure (>8 hours/week) was associated with increased symptom reporting, hazardous medication spills, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Female sex, older age, and spill exposure independently predicted symptom reporting and reproductive outcomes. No significant association was observed between exposure intensity and abnormal blood counts.

Conclusion: Questionnaire-based surveillance effectively identified exposure-related health risks, whereas routine complete blood count testing showed limited utility.

卫生保健工作者危险药物监测的标准化方法分析:经验教训和未来的改进。
目的:评价标准化危险药物监测项目的有效性,并确定与卫生保健工作者(HCWs)不良健康结果相关的职业因素。方法:我们分析了参加2020-2022年多地点监测项目的2625名医护人员的数据。参与者完成了一份标准化问卷,并进行了全血细胞计数测试。暴露程度按每周处理危险药物的时间分类。使用单变量和多变量分析评估相关性。结果:较高的暴露(bbb8小时/周)与症状报告增加、危险药物泄漏和不良生殖结果相关。女性性别、年龄和泄漏暴露独立预测症状报告和生殖结果。暴露强度和血液计数异常之间没有明显的联系。结论:基于问卷的监测有效地识别了暴露相关的健康风险,而常规全血细胞计数检测的效用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书