Defining the danger zone for peroneal nerve safety in all-inside lateral meniscus repair: an MRI-based study.

IF 0.6
Berin Tuğtağ Demir, Simge Eşme, Ümmühan Yağmurkaya, Ali Köksal, Murat Demirel, Burak Bilecenoğlu
{"title":"Defining the danger zone for peroneal nerve safety in all-inside lateral meniscus repair: an MRI-based study.","authors":"Berin Tuğtağ Demir, Simge Eşme, Ümmühan Yağmurkaya, Ali Köksal, Murat Demirel, Burak Bilecenoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s00117-026-01614-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peroneal (fibular) nerve (PN) traverses the posterolateral aspect of the knee joint, placing it at risk during lateral meniscus (LM) repair, given its proximity to the popliteus tendon (PoT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the risk of PN injury and define a safe anchor penetration angle during all-inside LM repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 327 individuals aged 18-60 years. The patellar tendon (PaT) and PoT widths were measured. The PN location relative to the PoT was determined. Distances from the PN to predefined medial and lateral reference lines across the PoT were calculated. The angular relationship between these lines and the transverse axis of the PaT was also analyzed for both anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) arthroscopic portals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PN-to-PoT distance was found to be comparable for both portals. However, the PN was significantly farther from the lateral reference line in the AM portal and from the medial reference line in the AL portal. The safe upper limit for anchor insertion was approximately 65° from the AM portal and 88° from the AL portal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Appropriate portal selection and anchor angle during all-inside LM repair can significantly reduce the risk of PN injury. The AL portal offers a broader safe insertion range and may therefore improve nerve protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-026-01614-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The peroneal (fibular) nerve (PN) traverses the posterolateral aspect of the knee joint, placing it at risk during lateral meniscus (LM) repair, given its proximity to the popliteus tendon (PoT).

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of PN injury and define a safe anchor penetration angle during all-inside LM repair.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 327 individuals aged 18-60 years. The patellar tendon (PaT) and PoT widths were measured. The PN location relative to the PoT was determined. Distances from the PN to predefined medial and lateral reference lines across the PoT were calculated. The angular relationship between these lines and the transverse axis of the PaT was also analyzed for both anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) arthroscopic portals.

Results: The PN-to-PoT distance was found to be comparable for both portals. However, the PN was significantly farther from the lateral reference line in the AM portal and from the medial reference line in the AL portal. The safe upper limit for anchor insertion was approximately 65° from the AM portal and 88° from the AL portal.

Conclusion: Appropriate portal selection and anchor angle during all-inside LM repair can significantly reduce the risk of PN injury. The AL portal offers a broader safe insertion range and may therefore improve nerve protection.

确定全内外侧半月板修复中腓神经安全的危险区域:一项基于mri的研究。
背景:腓(腓骨)神经(PN)穿过膝关节后外侧,在外侧半月板(LM)修复过程中,由于其靠近腘肌肌腱(PoT),使其处于危险之中。目的:本研究旨在评估全内嵌LM修复中PN损伤的风险,并确定一个安全的锚插入角度。材料与方法:对327例年龄在18-60岁的个体进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描进行回顾性分析。测量髌骨肌腱(PaT)和髌骨肌腱(PoT)宽度。确定PN相对于PoT的位置。计算从PN到预定的穿过PoT的内侧和外侧基准线的距离。这些线与PaT横轴之间的角关系也分析了前内侧(AM)和前外侧(AL)关节镜门静脉。结果:发现两个入口的pn到pot距离具有可比性。然而,PN明显远离AM门静脉的外侧基准线和AL门静脉的内侧基准线。锚点插入的安全上限大约是距AM门65°和距AL门88°。结论:选择合适的门静脉和锚定角度可显著降低全内门静脉修复术中PN损伤的风险。AL门提供了更广泛的安全插入范围,因此可以改善神经保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书