Psychometric Evaluation of the Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale and the Digital-Technology Self-Efficacy Scale Among Saudi Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study.
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale and the Digital-Technology Self-Efficacy Scale Among Saudi Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Nader Alnomasy, Habib Alrashedi, Sharifah Alsayed, Petelyne Pangket, Ebtsam Abou Hashish, Razan Alsayed, Romeo Jr Mostoles","doi":"10.2196/88075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of digital health technologies into nursing education in Saudi Arabia requires reliable tools to assess nursing informatics competency and digital technology self-efficacy among students.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Canadian Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment Scale (C-NICAS) and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy (DT-SE) scale among undergraduate nursing students at a Saudi university.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional survey of 243 undergraduate nursing students at the University of Ha'il was conducted using the C-NICAS and DT-SE. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach α, and construct validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 students participated (mean C-NICAS score 54.0, SD 16.9; mean DT-SE score 2.7, SD 0.56). Both scales showed good internal consistency (C-NICAS total α=0.90; DT-SE α=0.80). C-NICAS demonstrated a multidimensional factor structure with an acceptable model fit (comparative fit index=1.00; root mean square error of approximation=0.081), whereas DT-SE showed a 3-factor structure with a suboptimal confirmatory model fit (comparative fit index=0.76, root mean square error of approximation=0.146).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The C-NICAS and the DT-SE are suitable for assessing informatics competency and digital self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students at this institution, although further refinement of the DT-SE may improve model fit. These validated tools can inform curriculum reform at this and similar institutions in Saudi Arabia and support the digital health goals of Saudi Vision 2030.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"9 ","pages":"e88075"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/88075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The integration of digital health technologies into nursing education in Saudi Arabia requires reliable tools to assess nursing informatics competency and digital technology self-efficacy among students.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Canadian Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment Scale (C-NICAS) and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy (DT-SE) scale among undergraduate nursing students at a Saudi university.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of 243 undergraduate nursing students at the University of Ha'il was conducted using the C-NICAS and DT-SE. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach α, and construct validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results: A total of 243 students participated (mean C-NICAS score 54.0, SD 16.9; mean DT-SE score 2.7, SD 0.56). Both scales showed good internal consistency (C-NICAS total α=0.90; DT-SE α=0.80). C-NICAS demonstrated a multidimensional factor structure with an acceptable model fit (comparative fit index=1.00; root mean square error of approximation=0.081), whereas DT-SE showed a 3-factor structure with a suboptimal confirmatory model fit (comparative fit index=0.76, root mean square error of approximation=0.146).
Conclusions: The C-NICAS and the DT-SE are suitable for assessing informatics competency and digital self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students at this institution, although further refinement of the DT-SE may improve model fit. These validated tools can inform curriculum reform at this and similar institutions in Saudi Arabia and support the digital health goals of Saudi Vision 2030.