Cognition and future depression: associations with risk in those with and without a history of depression.

IF 6.6 0 PSYCHIATRY
Angharad N de Cates, Angeline Lee, Laura Winchester, Klaus P Ebmeier, Paris Lalousis, Rachel Upthegrove, Susannah E Murphy, Catherine J Harmer, Thomas Nichols, Anya Topiwala
{"title":"Cognition and future depression: associations with risk in those with and without a history of depression.","authors":"Angharad N de Cates, Angeline Lee, Laura Winchester, Klaus P Ebmeier, Paris Lalousis, Rachel Upthegrove, Susannah E Murphy, Catherine J Harmer, Thomas Nichols, Anya Topiwala","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-302332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairments are common in depression and often persist beyond mood resolution. However, the relationship between cognitive performance, its neurological underpinnings, and future depression risk is unclear, limiting strategies for primary and secondary prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to determine whether cognition associates with subsequent depression, both relapse and first-episode occurrences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1862 UK Biobank participants with a history of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10-defined depression in remission (RD) (mean (SD) age: 52.7 (7.13) years) were age-matched and sex-matched to 1862 participants without depression history or current antidepressant use. Cognitive scores were compared between groups at the composite (z-score), domain and task levels. MRI-derived phenotypes assessed brain network structure and functional connectivity. Longitudinal associations with future depression were assessed using logistic regression models and a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for key confounders.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants with RD had a higher risk of future depression (33%) than controls (13%), including when we accounted for temporal differences in longitudinal assessment (HR=3.16 (95% CI 2.71 to 3.67), global proportional hazard assumption p=0.07). Composite cognitive performance in controls was inversely associated with future depression risk (risk estimated marginal means: 0.25% at -1SD, 0.20% at mean, 0.15% at +1 SD). In RD, this relationship was reversed (0.74% at -1SD, 0.90% at mean, 1.10% at +1 SD). Executive functioning, processing speed and reasoning task scores all contributed. Higher grey matter in default mode network regions was associated with better concurrent cognitive performance across all participants, but not with future depression risk. Other MRI findings were limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RD carried a threefold higher risk of future depression than controls. Cognitive performance was a risk marker for future depression in both groups but in opposing directions. Neuroimaging metrics provided little predictive value.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Personalised risk factor assessment for depression is likely to be dependent on depression history. Those without previous history of diagnosed depression are at higher risk of future depression when cognitive performance is lower at baseline. RD is a high-risk group for future depression, and those with relatively higher cognitive performance may be more likely to report future depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-302332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairments are common in depression and often persist beyond mood resolution. However, the relationship between cognitive performance, its neurological underpinnings, and future depression risk is unclear, limiting strategies for primary and secondary prevention.

Objective: Our objective was to determine whether cognition associates with subsequent depression, both relapse and first-episode occurrences.

Methods: 1862 UK Biobank participants with a history of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10-defined depression in remission (RD) (mean (SD) age: 52.7 (7.13) years) were age-matched and sex-matched to 1862 participants without depression history or current antidepressant use. Cognitive scores were compared between groups at the composite (z-score), domain and task levels. MRI-derived phenotypes assessed brain network structure and functional connectivity. Longitudinal associations with future depression were assessed using logistic regression models and a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for key confounders.

Findings: Participants with RD had a higher risk of future depression (33%) than controls (13%), including when we accounted for temporal differences in longitudinal assessment (HR=3.16 (95% CI 2.71 to 3.67), global proportional hazard assumption p=0.07). Composite cognitive performance in controls was inversely associated with future depression risk (risk estimated marginal means: 0.25% at -1SD, 0.20% at mean, 0.15% at +1 SD). In RD, this relationship was reversed (0.74% at -1SD, 0.90% at mean, 1.10% at +1 SD). Executive functioning, processing speed and reasoning task scores all contributed. Higher grey matter in default mode network regions was associated with better concurrent cognitive performance across all participants, but not with future depression risk. Other MRI findings were limited.

Conclusions: RD carried a threefold higher risk of future depression than controls. Cognitive performance was a risk marker for future depression in both groups but in opposing directions. Neuroimaging metrics provided little predictive value.

Clinical implications: Personalised risk factor assessment for depression is likely to be dependent on depression history. Those without previous history of diagnosed depression are at higher risk of future depression when cognitive performance is lower at baseline. RD is a high-risk group for future depression, and those with relatively higher cognitive performance may be more likely to report future depressive symptoms.

认知和未来抑郁:有和没有抑郁史的人与风险的关系。
背景:认知障碍在抑郁症中很常见,并且经常在情绪解决后持续存在。然而,认知表现及其神经基础与未来抑郁风险之间的关系尚不清楚,这限制了一级和二级预防策略。目的:我们的目的是确定认知是否与随后的抑郁症相关,包括复发和首次发作。方法:1862名具有国际疾病分类(ICD)-10定义的抑郁缓解(RD)史的英国生物银行参与者(平均(SD)年龄:52.7(7.13)岁)与1862名无抑郁史或目前使用抗抑郁药的参与者年龄和性别匹配。在综合(z-score)、领域和任务水平上比较各组之间的认知得分。mri衍生的表型评估了大脑网络结构和功能连接。使用逻辑回归模型和控制关键混杂因素的Cox比例风险模型评估与未来抑郁的纵向关联。研究结果:RD患者未来抑郁的风险(33%)高于对照组(13%),包括纵向评估的时间差异(HR=3.16 (95% CI 2.71至3.67),全球比例风险假设p=0.07)。对照组的复合认知表现与未来抑郁风险呈负相关(风险估计边际均值:-1SD时0.25%,平均值0.20%,+1 SD时0.15%)。在RD中,这种关系被逆转(-1SD时为0.74%,平均为0.90%,+1 SD时为1.10%)。执行功能、处理速度和推理任务得分都有影响。在所有参与者中,默认模式网络区域中较高的灰质与更好的并发认知表现有关,但与未来的抑郁风险无关。其他MRI表现有限。结论:RD患者未来抑郁的风险比对照组高3倍。在两组中,认知表现都是未来抑郁的风险标志,但方向相反。神经影像学指标提供的预测价值很小。临床意义:抑郁症的个体化风险因素评估可能依赖于抑郁症病史。那些以前没有抑郁症病史的人,当认知能力在基线时较低时,未来患抑郁症的风险更高。RD是未来抑郁的高危人群,那些认知能力相对较高的人可能更有可能报告未来的抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书